Le dimanche 25 décembre 2011 06:06, fakessh @ a écrit :
> Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit :
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
> > > hello list
> > > hello geek
> > > hello guru
> > > hello Fu
> > Hi
> > Problem usually occur when you run dspam from pipe, and my gues
Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
> > hello list
> > hello geek
> > hello guru
> > hello Fu
> >
> > I have done tests on my smtp server used to dspam.
> > after problems of housing road I realized that dspam removes Return-Path
> > he
On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 23:09:24 -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> In the absence of full information, here's a WAG:
>
> > ...
> > : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
> > rejected: cannot find your hostn
On 12/24/2011 9:37 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> Merry Christmas All!
>
> I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
>
> : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client
> host rejected: cannot find your hostname,
>
> : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[115.1
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
In the absence of full information, here's a WAG:
> ...
> : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
> rejected: cannot find your hostname,
% host 41.203.141.1
Host 1.141.203.41.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(S
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
>
> : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
> rejected: cannot find your hostname,
>
> : NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[115.153.142.12
Merry Christmas All!
I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
rejected: cannot find your hostname,
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[115.153.142.125]: 550 5.7.1 Client
host rejected: cannot find
* Dennis Carr :
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Andreas Berton wrote:
>
> >
> >Merry christmas to you all!
>
>
> You as well! Have a safe and happy holiday, and a prosperous 2012!
>
> ANd as to the subject - no, I don't rest. This is what espresso and
> Red Bull are for. =D
rest is for web serves. We
On 2011-12-23 6:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'm confused about this warning I just saw in my logs (never seen it
before):
Dec 23 12:03:24 myhost postfix/bounce[19970]: warning: [built-in]: zero
result in delay template conversion of parameter "delay_warning_time_hours"
Dec 23 12:03:24 myhost po
response in line below.
On 12/24/11 9:32 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2011 11:09:08 Noah wrote:
I am getting lots of emails claiming the following "delivery
temporarily suspended: conversation with,127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
timed out while receiving the initial server greeting" .
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I would be more concerned about the TOW missile Santa Claus
has... he does outweapon the Kwanzabot.
Ho, ho, ho! It's time to get jolly on your naughty asses!
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Ber
On Saturday 24 December 2011 11:09:08 Noah wrote:
> I am getting lots of emails claiming the following "delivery
> temporarily suspended: conversation with,127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
> timed out while receiving the initial server greeting" . I am
> seeing this message show up to the local user and a
Hi there,
I am getting lots of emails claiming the following "delivery temporarily
suspended: conversation with,127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while
receiving the initial server greeting" . I am seeing this message show
up to the local user and also to the remote sender inbox too. The
m
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:34:37 +0100 (CET)
> Andreas Berton articulated:
>
>> Merry christmas to you all!
>
> Have you ever considered the irony in the fact that we celebrate
> Christ's birthday every year by ignoring the fact that he would have
> cele
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Andreas Berton wrote:
Merry christmas to you all!
You as well! Have a safe and happy holiday, and a prosperous 2012!
ANd as to the subject - no, I don't rest. This is what espresso and Red
Bull are for. =D
-Dennis
On Saturday 24 December 2011 07:48:18 . wrote:
> On 12/24/2011 05:21 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > On 12/23/2011 9:43 PM, . wrote:
> >> I'm very new at mail server stuff and not too technical in
> >> experiencebut can follow well written instructions.
[snip]
> > After reading this and your subse
Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:34:37 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Berton articulated:
Merry christmas to you all!
Have you ever considered the irony in the fact that we celebrate
Christ's birthday every year by ignoring the fact that he would have
celebrated Hanukkah?
Let's make that Merry Chri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/24/2011 05:21 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 12/23/2011 9:43 PM, . wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'm very new at mail server stuff and not too technical in
>> experiencebut can follow well written instr
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:34:37 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Berton articulated:
> Merry christmas to you all!
Have you ever considered the irony in the fact that we celebrate
Christ's birthday every year by ignoring the fact that he would have
celebrated Hanukkah?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
___
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 04:21:12 -0600
Stan Hoeppner articulated:
> After reading this and your subsequent posts, it is abundantly clear
> that you don't have the prerequisite technical background to
> accomplish what you want. And we can't dedicate the resources to
> teaching you all that is require
On 12/23/2011 9:43 PM, . wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm very new at mail server stuff and not too technical in
> experiencebut can follow well written instructions.
>
> The first difficulty I had after installation of Postfix was about the
> Static IP addr
21 matches
Mail list logo
