On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:59:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.12.2011 10:42, schrieb Sebastian Wiesinger:
> >> Do not use SQL in virtual_mailbox_domains[1]; instead, set the
> >> latter to a regular list. Then, even when MySQL is down, Postfix
> >> will defer mail with 4.3.0 instead of appea
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:42:30 +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Sahil Tandon [2011-12-05 03:24]:
> > > I'm using Postfix with MySQL via proxy:mysql maps. The documentation
> > > states that mails should get deferred if no mysql server is reachable.
> > >
> > > However when I shut down MySQL
From: Lima Union
>To:
>Cc: Postfix users
>Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 8:02 AM
>Subject: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
>
>
>I'm having the same problem here, a lot of spam comming from YAHOO mail system.
>I didn't know about sanesecurity, I'll give it a tr
From: Steve
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 4:59 AM
>Subject: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
>
>> >I wish there was a chart for spam sent FROM yahoo. 99% of our spam comes
>> from yahoo (that gets through postscreen).
>>
>On my
* Pierre Girard :
> The email is sent automatically by the autoupdate program and it's
> using mail/mailx to send it.
In that case I'd blame mail/mailx :)
Are you sure it's using those instead of just piping to sendmail?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité -
On 2011-12-05 15:36, DN Singh wrote:
Yes, I tried to figure it out that way, but the numbers aren't constant.
Have you considered that this is because your submission is not 100% flat ?
If you submit or retry in bursts (and when they block you for a fixed
period of time after denying access, y
Le 2011-12-05 11:14, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Your mail submission program submits non-compliant email into
Postfix. It should encode message headers that contain non-ASCII
content.
Thanks for the information.
The email is sent automatically by the autoupdate program and it's using
mail/mailx
Pierre Girard:
> Hello,
> I set up a small ubuntu 10.04 machine with postfix on it and it
> seems to be working fine. However on the destination server there's this
> message in the headers
>
> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex): Subject:
> test \303\251tudi
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:10:11 +0530 (IST)
Ramesh wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I
> would like know to steps required to hide private ip address in
> postfix, ...
[snip]
Header checks with appropriate regexp and IGNORE.
> ...and also shows public ip address of firewall instead of
> public ip address of m
On 12/5/2011 9:40 AM, Ramesh wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
>
> I would like know to steps required to hide private ip address in
> postfix, when we sent email, full header at recipient end shows
> client private ip address and also shows public ip address of
> firewall instead of public ip address of ma
On Monday 05 December 2011 06:11:27 Ignacio wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Your OP sounded as if the headers needed to change for some
> > reason. Since we now know that envelope senders and recipients
> > are what matters, it's time to move beyond.
> >
> > Unfortun
* Pierre Girard :
> Hello,
> I set up a small ubuntu 10.04 machine with postfix on it and it
> seems to be working fine. However on the destination server there's this
> message in the headers
>
> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex): Subject:
> test \303\251tud
Hello,
I set up a small ubuntu 10.04 machine with postfix on it and it
seems to be working fine. However on the destination server there's this
message in the headers
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex): Subject:
test \303\251tudiants\n
Is it incorrect for po
Hi List,
I
would like know to steps required to hide private ip address in postfix,
when we sent email, full header at recipient end shows client private
ip address and also shows public ip address of firewall instead of
public ip address of mail server. i have cross checked iptables nating
rul
Sharma, Ashish:
> Hi,
>
> I have a mail receiving postfix server with my custom email filter
> and a custom content filter.
>
> The entire system was made for the case of receiving emails meant
> for single recipients only on the same mail domain, mails directed
> for multiple recipients for the r
Hi,
I have a mail receiving postfix server with my custom email filter and a custom
content filter.
The entire system was made for the case of receiving emails meant for single
recipients only on the same mail domain, mails directed for multiple recipients
for the receiving email domain were r
Yes, I tried to figure it out that way, but the numbers aren't constant.
Which is I was experimenting on the delays, and then ended up on this
topic...
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> DN Singh:
> > The problem is that I am unable to find any hard limit of acceptance of
> >
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
> Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
> To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see
> http://visuali
DN Singh:
> The problem is that I am unable to find any hard limit of acceptance of
> mails to these destinations. I have even tried creating slow transports for
> them, but they still seem to drop connections after DATA command or RCPT
> command.
>
> "lost connection with mx.rediffmail.rediff.aka
Mailman[list manager], could do perfectly, the job. You should create a
separated lists for the users, and his options as you pointed, Mailman
has a strong/easy-to-understand&use backend.
HTH, Goutam.
Best regards.
--
/***
*Leslie León Sinclair
The problem is that I am unable to find any hard limit of acceptance of
mails to these destinations. I have even tried creating slow transports for
them, but they still seem to drop connections after DATA command or RCPT
command.
"lost connection with mx.rediffmail.rediff.akadns.net[119.252.147.10
Dear List,
We are planning to implement a mailing solution using Postfix et el. The
total number of users of this system is likely to be around 8000. We would
need to send frequently mails to all the users and also sometimes to some of
the users based on some user attributes. We would request you
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Please stop top-posting your replies. Thank you.
>
I am sorry about that.
>
> On Sunday 04 December 2011 01:04:44 Ignacio wrote:
> > Fixing the application is not possible since we don't own
> > source code and owner company doesn't want to cha
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, email builder wrote:
>>> > I'm currently backing up my machine at home to a WD "My Passport" USB
>
>>> > drive, doing a monthly full and nightly differential, using a script
>>> > that employs rsync. Each backup set looks like a full backup. Works
>>> > like a ch
On 2/12/2011 8:02 πμ, email builder wrote:
No other people have systems for doing this?
Perhaps a bit late in this thread, but we are using Mondo Archive (on
CentOS 5.7) and it works great; quite flexible and with easy and
effective restore.
Check: http://www.mondorescue.org/
A short intr
Am 05.12.2011 12:12, schrieb DN Singh:
> SPF, DKIM, FBL everything being followed, but still no more than 3-4k
> delivery to hotmail/rediff. Any ideas group?? Can these destinations be
> classified as dead, when they start deferring?
sorry ,they arent "dead" at all, even if they dont take mail fr
SPF, DKIM, FBL everything being followed, but still no more than 3-4k
delivery to hotmail/rediff. Any ideas group?? Can these destinations be
classified as dead, when they start deferring?
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:59 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2011 08:23:53 Mark Goodge wrote:
Am 05.12.2011 10:42, schrieb Sebastian Wiesinger:
>> Do not use SQL in virtual_mailbox_domains[1]; instead, set the latter to
>> a regular list. Then, even when MySQL is down, Postfix will defer mail
>> with 4.3.0 instead of appearing to freeze.
>
> Hi Sahil,
>
> that's not really an option for
* Sahil Tandon [2011-12-05 03:24]:
> > I'm using Postfix with MySQL via proxy:mysql maps. The documentation
> > states that mails should get deferred if no mysql server is reachable.
> >
> > However when I shut down MySQL, SMTP transaction freeze after I enter
> > the "MAIL FROM:<...>" statement.
29 matches
Mail list logo
