Hi,
>> I built a dual-Xeon quad-core box with 8GB using fedora15 and
>> postfix-v2.8.5 and during various times during the day connections to
>> port 25 timeout or are very slow. The majority of times this happens
>> is under peak loads, but even times when it's not at capacity it may
>> do this.
Hello Group,
I want to implement some restrictions on postfix by which it would reject
domains without mx records, as well as those specified in access table.
These are some domains to I do not want to send mails at all. My problem is
that, this setting does not work at all, since the sending IPs
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0100, gmx Ralf Hauser wrote:
> Any hints how to do a client certificate authentication TLS-handshake
> between IBM's v8.51 as the client and postfix/openssl on the server side
> would be highly appreciated.
If you want to validate client certs, you have to ask
On 11/16/2011 01:01 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
> get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
> source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
> there's an alternative downlo
On 11/16/2011 7:56 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> I built a dual-Xeon quad-core box with 8GB using fedora15 and
> postfix-v2.8.5 and during various times during the day connections to
> port 25 timeout or are very slow. The majority of times this happens
> is under peak loads, but even times when it's not
Hi,
I built a dual-Xeon quad-core box with 8GB using fedora15 and
postfix-v2.8.5 and during various times during the day connections to
port 25 timeout or are very slow. The majority of times this happens
is under peak loads, but even times when it's not at capacity it may
do this.
I have a simila
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:02:03PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Solar Designer:
> > OK. I took a look at the code and I see those difficulties now. How
> > about something like the attached patch? It's totally untested other
> > than that it compiles, and it's probably wrong (especially conside
Solar Designer:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:11:17PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > As I explained in a different response, there is no "this table"
> > concept outside the low-level (pcre, hash, etc.) table itself. At
> > higher levels, there is a lookup result without source attribution.
> >
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:11:17PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> As I explained in a different response, there is no "this table"
> concept outside the low-level (pcre, hash, etc.) table itself. At
> higher levels, there is a lookup result without source attribution.
>
> Considering Postfix's dri
On 2011-11-16 18:07, Mark2 wrote:
Hi all,
I google and couldn't find any answer about how to configurate the postfix to
forward wildcard emails to anther email account.
I cannot use catchall account because I have 3 seperate email accounts to deal
with different bounced email purpose. I tried
Solar Designer:
> Wietse,
>
> Thank you for your comments and explanation!
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:04:10PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I must confess that I no longer understand what the purpose is of
> > ACCEPT in header_checks, if the purpose is other than skipping
> > all further lo
On 11/16/2011 3:40 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Daniel Bromberg :
On 11/16/2011 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated,
nightly,
incremental file backup for my mai
Zitat von Daniel Bromberg :
On 11/16/2011 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
these days i would go ahead and move the m
Wietse,
Thank you for your comments and explanation!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:04:10PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I must confess that I no longer understand what the purpose is of
> ACCEPT in header_checks, if the purpose is other than skipping
> all further lookups of all header_checks table
On 11/16/2011 1:36 PM, Martin Schütte wrote:
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an increme
may be of interest.
works with postfix
http://archiveopteryx.org/postfix
On 11/16/2011 1:36 PM, Martin Schütte wrote:
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an increme
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
> I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an incremental backup with dump(8).
--
Martin
On 11/16/2011 1:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 19:04, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
and making a restore request goes to their sysadmin
ticketing system and takes days and days. :-(
if this happens they are not useable for any business
i fear you will get no hosting with direct access to
Am 16.11.2011 19:04, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
> and making a restore request goes to their sysadmin
> ticketing system and takes days and days. :-(
if this happens they are not useable for any business
i fear you will get no hosting with direct access to the VMware-level because
this would mean
On 16 November 2011 13:01, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
> get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
> source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
> there's an alternative dow
unfortunately this has happened before :(
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/34195
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, David Mehler wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:01:33 -0500
From: David Mehler
To: Postfix users
Subject: openspf.org
Hello,
I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix
On 11/16/2011 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
these days i would go ahead and move the mailserver on a VMware-vCenter
Solar Designer:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:48:34AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > ACCEPT is simply to explain only if it disables all further checks.
> > Things become messy otherwise.
>
> Maybe we should call it other than ACCEPT, then - to make it clear that
> other restrictions elsewhere may
Hello,
I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
there's an alternative download available?
Thanks.
Dave.
We use backuppc from backuppc.sf.net for all of our backup needs. We have 6TB of storage notched out for this and here are the specs as of today:
BackupPC: Host Summary
This status was generated at 11/16 11:54.
Pool file system was recently at 94% (11/16 11:46), today's max is 94% (11/
Solar Designer:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:39:00AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:06:36 Solar Designer wrote:
> > > I admit I'm not familiar with the code and I haven't tried to
> > > implement ACCEPT yet, but aren't DISCARD and REJECT also
> > > whole-message action
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
> Greetings All,
>
> I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
> incremental file backup for my mail server.
these days i would go ahead and move the mailserver on a VMware-vCenter and
with the essentials-plus license yo
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
This is admittedly a tangential topic, but I know the users here will
have good insights (or at least send me in the right direction). Hoping
for maybe 5 recomme
On 16/11/11 18:07, Mark2 wrote:
> That's what I would like to do:
>
> _re...@mymail.com --> re...@mymail.com
> _nore...@mymail.com --> nore...@mymail.com
> xxx_s...@mymail.com --> s...@mymail.com
Is this format of the address a strict requirement?
Otherwise, you can have them in the for
Hi all,
I google and couldn't find any answer about how to configurate the postfix to
forward wildcard emails to anther email account.
I cannot use catchall account because I have 3 seperate email accounts to deal
with different bounced email purpose. I tried the alias and didn't work.
That's
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:48:34AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ACCEPT is simply to explain only if it disables all further checks.
> Things become messy otherwise.
Maybe we should call it other than ACCEPT, then - to make it clear that
other restrictions elsewhere may still reject the message?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:39:00AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:06:36 Solar Designer wrote:
> > I admit I'm not familiar with the code and I haven't tried to
> > implement ACCEPT yet, but aren't DISCARD and REJECT also
> > whole-message actions? Is ACCEPT somehow very
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:39:00 I wrote:
> A single reject action anywhere before acceptance causes the mail
> to be rejected. Numerous permit (or dunno) actions are required
> for acceptance; one per restriction stage, one per each header
> evaluated in header_checks(5), one for each line i
Solar Designer:
[on whitelisting]
> > State, including what message the line belongs to, is not saved
> > between lines.
> >
> > Adding any kind of whole-message action would require major changes
> > to the way cleanup works, and is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
>
> I admit I'm not familiar w
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:06:36 Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:36:21AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> > If you need more fine-grained control, use eg. SpamAssassin.
>
> I don't feel that whitelisting of PGP-encrypted messages is more
> fine-grained than the kind of blacklist
On 16 November 2011 16:18, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 03:03:42 Frank Bonnet wrote:
> > I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
> > be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
>
> "Best" is subjective. All choices have good and bad poin
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:36:21AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 8:32 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> > I'd like to have an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks.
> > This was requested before:
> >
> > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1116.html
> >
> > I've
Any one ?
If virtual_users contains the following entry, what will be the postmap query
to retrieve the value pair?
I know postfix is RFC822 compliant as well this email ID, so i'm confident some
genius will come up with a
suitable query to retrieve the value.
virtual_users
"#criticalemail
On 11/16/2011 8:32 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to have an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks.
> This was requested before:
>
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1116.html
>
> I've read the replies in that thread, and I continue to think that
>
Please stop top-posting. Thank you.
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 08:43:49 Amira Othman wrote:
> How can I separate logs of the instances to be different files?
You asked this last week, on Thursday. Brian and I answered you.
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
"/dev/rob0
On 2011-11-16 15:43, Amira Othman wrote:
How can I separate logs of the instances to be different files?
Postfix logs to syslog; where these logs end up is not under postfix's
control.
--
J.
How can I separate logs of the instances to be different files?
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8 and I have configured two postfix instances.
> I want to display ip of sending domain in log . I tried
> smtp_bind_address but this didn't work. Any suggestions about this ?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
Hi,
I'd like to have an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks.
This was requested before:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1116.html
I've read the replies in that thread, and I continue to think that
adding an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks is a
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 03:03:42 Frank Bonnet wrote:
> I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
> be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
"Best" is subjective. All choices have good and bad points. Local
files, however, have the advantage of not re
On 16.11.2011 13:54, Noel Jones wrote:
One of your LDAP lookups is broken, matching more than it should.
Test your lookups with "postmap -q myn...@nonlocal.example.com
ldap:table" to find what's returning an answer when it shouldn't.
Hi Noel,
thanks for the hint. Now it's working.
Best regar
On 11/16/2011 7:07 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8 and I have configured two postfix instances.
> I want to display ip of sending domain in log . I tried
> smtp_bind_address but this didn’t work. Any suggestions about this ?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
Postfix does not log
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 and I have configured two postfix instances. I want
to display ip of sending domain in log . I tried smtp_bind_address but this
didn't work. Any suggestions about this ?
Regards
On 11/16/2011 5:57 AM, Denis Witt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 with OpenLDAP. Everything works
> fine except one thing. If I send an E-Mail to
> $myname@$nonlocaldomain.com it's delivered to my local postbox.
>
> This becomes a major problem when you need to send E-Mails to
Hi,
In our postfix server, we see
SSL_accept error from hgrs-mail01.hgrs.tld.dom[161.x.y.z]: 0
Nov 16 08:54:52 postfix2cc/smtpd[18662]: warning: TLS library problem:
18662:error:140943E8:SSL
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:reason(1000):s3_pkt.c:1053:SSL alert number 0:
This error message apparently m
On 2011-11-16 6:57 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 with OpenLDAP. Everything works fine
except one thing. If I send an E-Mail to $myname@$nonlocaldomain.com
it's delivered to my local postbox.
This becomes a major problem when you need to send E-Mails to
role-accou
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 with OpenLDAP. Everything works fine
except one thing. If I send an E-Mail to $myname@$nonlocaldomain.com
it's delivered to my local postbox.
This becomes a major problem when you need to send E-Mails to
role-accounts like abuse, postmaster or info. ;)
Le 11/16/2011 11:00 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet :
Le 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet :
Hello
I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
Th
Zitat von Frank Bonnet :
Le 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet :
Hello
I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mai
Le 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet :
Hello
I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mailboxes
the machine is a "vi
Hi Frank
this may depend on admin tools you need/have to maintain your
background DB.
Because we in our domain have an LDAP-Web Client , we chose LDAP as
backgroung DB.
Others may have sofisticated MySQL clients, which makes them choose
MySQL as background DB.
suomi
On 2011-11-16 10:03, Fr
Zitat von Frank Bonnet :
Hello
I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mailboxes
the machine is a "virtual one" hosted at OVH (France) running Ubuntu 10.4 L
Hello
I have to setup a "virtual" postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mailboxes
the machine is a "virtual one" hosted at OVH (France) running Ubuntu
10.4 LTS
with 4 Gb of dedicated
58 matches
Mail list logo
