On 06/10/2011 05:06, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Last time I looked (just now), RFC5321 stated:
"SMTP servers SHOULD support HELP without arguments and MAY support it
with arguments."
Not implemented, yes, and Postfix properly responds with a 502 response
code. Arguably not all that useful when imple
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:06:41 AM Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:28:40PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
> >> Running Postfix 2.8.2
> >>
> >> When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
> >>
> >> it says unknown com
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:28:40PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
Running Postfix 2.8.2
When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
it says unknown command.
Thanks in advance for pointers to RTFM.
Homer Smith
Lightlink Internet
For
On 10/5/2011 6:23 PM, John Allen wrote:
> I am getting the following message/errors
>
> Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/qmgr[18862]: 125BC2400A7:
> from=, size=2760, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/smtp[28713]: 125BC2400A7: enabling
> PIX workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dot
I am getting the following message/errors
Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/qmgr[18862]: 125BC2400A7:
from=, size=2760, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/smtp[28713]: 125BC2400A7: enabling PIX
workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dotcrlf for
mail.abc.tld[123.456.789.123]:25
Oct 5
Great, I'll look into that.
Thanks a lot,
Aleksandar
2011/10/5 Noel Jones :
> On 10/5/2011 5:00 AM, Aleksandar Vukovic wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> Is it possible to somehow limit smtpd_sender_restrictions only to
>> outgoing mail?
>> I want to use check_sender_access on my outgoing mail so tha
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:28:40PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>
> Running Postfix 2.8.2
>
> When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
> it says unknown command.
>
> Thanks in advance for pointers to RTFM.
>
> Homer Smith
> Lightlink Internet
For help with
> Well the full list of grades is:
Thanks. I finally found the GRADE's (default), editable cipherlists on
lmtp(8):
tls_high_cipherlist (ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:+RC4:@STRENGTH)
tls_medium_cipherlist (ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:+RC4:@STRENGTH)
tls_low_cipherlist(ALL:!EXPORT:+RC4:@STRENGTH)
tls_exp
Running Postfix 2.8.2
When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
it says unknown command.
Thanks in advance for pointers to RTFM.
Homer Smith
Lightlink Internet
Homer Wilson Smith The
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:00:40PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> mephistophe...@operamail.com:
> > smtpd_tls_ciphers = RSA
>
> As documented, smtpd_tls_ciphers specifies a cipher GRADE
> not a cipher NAME.
>
> TLS_README suggests that the grades are export and high.
Well the full list of grades
On 5/10/2011 10:20 μμ, John Baker wrote:
We have been having some trouble with Temporary lookup failures from
ldap lookup timeouts and I have been trying to find ways to solve the
problem. One thing I would like to do is cut down on the volume of
lookups by skipping virtual alias lookups if th
On 5/10/2011 8:47 μμ, Shane Chrisp wrote:
If I cant find a way of working around the domain aliasing, it wont be
the end of the world.
You might want to read this thread:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/239812
After some thought, you could try adding to virtual_alia
On 10/5/2011 3:03 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> Our postfix server acts as a spam server for a number of domains and is
> designed to forward email to the final destination; it has not been setup as
> a local mail server.
>
> Every once in a while, it will attempt to send an email to
> "root@NT-SPAM
Our postfix server acts as a spam server for a number of domains and is
designed to forward email to the final destination; it has not been setup as a
local mail server.
Every once in a while, it will attempt to send an email to
"root@NT-SPAM01.adetor-lan.InternalDomain.local" and will be defer
On 10/5/2011 2:20 PM, John Baker wrote:
> We have been having some trouble with Temporary lookup failures from
> ldap lookup timeouts and I have been trying to find ways to solve
> the problem. One thing I would like to do is cut down on the volume
> of lookups by skipping virtual alias lookups if
On 10/5/2011 5:00 AM, Aleksandar Vukovic wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Is it possible to somehow limit smtpd_sender_restrictions only to
> outgoing mail?
> I want to use check_sender_access on my outgoing mail so that in MAIL
> FROM only addresses from my list of emails are allowed. I guess that
> on
We have been having some trouble with Temporary lookup failures from ldap
lookup timeouts and I have been trying to find ways to solve the problem.
One thing I would like to do is cut down on the volume of lookups by
skipping virtual alias lookups if the mail is being relayed from another of
our ma
Thanks for the quick replies. "postfwd" seems to be having the feature.
Great...
Cheers,
Janaka
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:03:30 Janaka Wickramasinghe wrote:
> > > Is there a way to limit the number of recipients p
My Postfix delivers to an IMAP store using LMTP.
I intend to have known users only defined in IMAP server's LMTP config.
To check for valid users, and reject if not found, I use Postfix's
(http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html)
reject_sender_login_mismatch
For simple config, I add that to
On 05/10/11 21:41, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I have no answer to this problem, I am afraid.
First, according to http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html, you could
add for such a domain (e.g. aliased.example.com) an LDAP entry with
mailacceptinggeneralid = aliased.example.com (no maildrop needed).
T
Hi Brian,
Am 05.10.2011 14:48, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
> If you remove a content filter without draining the queue, you need to
> re-queue all messages using 'postsuper -r ALL'
great thanks a lot, that is what I searched for.
Best regards,
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race
/dev/rob0:
> On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:03:30 Janaka Wickramasinghe wrote:
> > Is there a way to limit the number of recipients per message
> > based on the sender email address ?
>
> This would require an external policy service acting on sender and
> recipient_count attributes. I'm not sur
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:03:30 Janaka Wickramasinghe wrote:
> Is there a way to limit the number of recipients per message
> based on the sender email address ?
This would require an external policy service acting on sender and
recipient_count attributes. I'm not sure if any of the existin
On 5/10/2011 3:17 μμ, Shane Chrisp wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thank you very much for your reply. From that setuo I can see how to
setup a catchall with a minor change to our current setup.
The domain to domain alias is a way of saying that we have a real
domain of dom1.tld and another domain od dom2
* Wietse Venema :
> The ? does not do what you guys are thinking. The .*? turns on
> lazy matching. Without this, .* would also match \bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)
> and that is not what we want.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#Lazy_quantification
Obviously, it's time for another stay
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Wietse Venema :
> > Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > > I have a question regarding the "Bounce-never mail sink" regexp:
> > >
> > > postconf(5) gives this example:
> > >
> > >/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
> > >
> > > Isn't there a '>' missing b
On 10/5/2011 4:01 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
>
> My problem is now that some mails are queued and I cannot resend them
> because it seems that postfix want to use a content filter I alread
> disabled.
> The old line in master.cf
* Wietse Venema :
> Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > I have a question regarding the "Bounce-never mail sink" regexp:
> >
> > postconf(5) gives this example:
> >
> >/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
> >
> > Isn't there a '>' missing before the '?'. As I understand it th
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> I have a question regarding the "Bounce-never mail sink" regexp:
>
> postconf(5) gives this example:
>
>/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
>
> Isn't there a '>' missing before the '?'. As I understand it the '?' makes the
> preceeding chara
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> I do know that a change in *.db and *.cdb files is "picked up
> immediately", simply by the affected daemon dying and opening the
> new file upon startup.
These files are not read into memory, so they must be kept open.
> So far, so good.
>
> But why is that not done for pcre
I have a question regarding the "Bounce-never mail sink" regexp:
postconf(5) gives this example:
/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
Isn't there a '>' missing before the '?'. As I understand it the '?' makes the
preceeding character optional e.g. example.com and ex
On 5/10/2011 10:23 πμ, Shane Chrisp wrote:
no problems, but I am having trouble working out how I will be able to
add domain to domain aliases and also catchall
accounts for domains. Personally I hate catchall accounts for domains,
but some customers just have to have them, or
...
using the Pham
Hi All,
Thanks for your suggestions, have got unlisted from rbl's as of now. I am
using Cisco Iron-port as Mail Gateway so outgoing mails are scanned by
Iron-port.
We have done some FBL sign-up also.
Regards,
Dhanraj Wadhe
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Ramprasad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-04
Hi everybody,
Is it possible to somehow limit smtpd_sender_restrictions only to
outgoing mail?
I want to use check_sender_access on my outgoing mail so that in MAIL
FROM only addresses from my list of emails are allowed. I guess that
one (ugly) way to solve this is to have 2 Postfix servers so tha
I do know that a change in *.db and *.cdb files is "picked up
immediately", simply by the affected daemon dying and opening the
new file upon startup.
So far, so good.
But why is that not done for pcre, regexp and cidr files?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Char
remove
___
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192
Dear list,
I installed some time ago dspam and integrated it into postfix.
The order was
postfix -> amavisd with reinject into postfix -> dspam with reinject
into postfix.
But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
My problem is now that some mails are queued and I canno
Hi All,
We are currently migrating all our customers accounts to ldap to make
it simpler as currently they are all over
the place. Our current Postfix installation is using MySQL for virtual
accounts and delivery is done with dovecot
and it works great and provides the ability to alias domains
38 matches
Mail list logo
