Hi All,
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue
with getting black listed again and again.
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and dnsbl.
Regards,
Dhanraj Wadhe
Le lundi 3 octobre 2011 19:09, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> > it takes 5 minutes to clean the SPEC-File and remove
> > these patches - really i do not understand your problem
>
> It takes 5 minutes for YOU to clean the SPEC file, because you're
Zitat von Simeon Ott :
On 03.10.2011, at 13:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
Simeon Ott:
On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
Simeon Ott:
and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a
bit strange to
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andy Jezierski:
>> : Recipient address rejected:
>> undeliverable address: User unknown in virtual alias table;
>> from= to=
>
> This means that there is no rule that rewrites this recipient to an
> address that is not in a virtual alias doma
On 03/ott/2011, at 19:49, Davide Corio wrote:
> in main.cf i've also wrote:
> virtual_transport = dovecot
>
i forgot a ":" after dovecot :-)
cheers,
--
Davide Corio
enlig...@gmail.com
Hello *,
i'm trying to correctly configure postfix (2.8.2) and dovecot (1.2.15) to work
together on Ubuntu 11.04.
everything seems to work fine but this:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
i plac
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it takes 5 minutes to clean the SPEC-File and remove
> these patches - really i do not understand your problem
It takes 5 minutes for YOU to clean the SPEC file, because you're
familiar with Postfix, you know precisely what you want in a Pos
Am 03.10.2011 18:48, schrieb Steve Jenkins:
> Normally, I like to use RPMs when possible. However, in the case of
> Postfix, I've found it's much easier, and allows for much more
> flexibility, to simply declare the settings you need with "make
> makefiles" and then just build from the source as
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> I would suggest you to use source code and build according to these
> directions:
> http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/
At the risk of sounding biased, +1 to Nikolaos' thoughts. :)
>>> Ha
Ram:
> On 10/01/2011 06:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Ram:
> >> According to access Manpage
> >> http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
> >>
> >> The BCC option for a access lookup is not supported. When will
> >> support for BCC be added ?
> > According to the HISTORY file:
> >
> > 20070405
> >
On 10/01/2011 06:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ram:
According to access Manpage
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
The BCC option for a access lookup is not supported. When will
support for BCC be added ?
According to the HISTORY file:
20070405
Feature: BCC access/policy action
Simeon Ott:
> On 03.10.2011, at 13:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Simeon Ott:
> >>
> >> On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >>> Simeon Ott:
> and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
> am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that
On 03.10.2011, at 13:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simeon Ott:
>>
>> On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> Simeon Ott:
and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a
bit strange to
Simeon Ott:
>
> On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Simeon Ott:
> >> and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
> >> am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a
> >> bit strange to me.
> >
> > First, few sites use BATV.
> >
> > S
Zitat von Simeon Ott :
On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
Simeon Ott:
and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a
bit strange to me.
First, few sites use BATV.
Second, BATV works perfect
I would suggest you to use source code and build according to these
directions:
http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/
I use SASL, LDAP, TLS and all are supported with the default CentOS
configuration options as described on that page.
That's
On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simeon Ott:
>> and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
>> am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a
>> bit strange to me.
>
> First, few sites use BATV.
>
> Second, BATV works perfectly fine w
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:29:16 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
RECEIVED: from www.alwaysbuywholesale.com (unknown [74.63.3.132])
by vps.velvetpixel.net
Is this a DNS issue or a Postfix configuration issue?
isp issue, ask them to set PTR dns for your reverse dns, most isp will
if you add a A record
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:25:07 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
How can I set a different SMTP hostname greeting for each dedicated
IP
Address on my server?
[snip]
192.0.43.11:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o myhostname=domainone.com
192.0.43.12:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o myhostname=domaintwo.com
192.
19 matches
Mail list logo