Issue with getting listed in spam again and again.

2011-10-03 Thread Dhanraj Wadhe
Hi All, We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue with getting black listed again and again. Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting listed into rbl's and dnsbl. Regards, Dhanraj Wadhe

Re: upgrade to 2.8.5 with src rpm

2011-10-03 Thread m...@smtp.fakessh.eu
Le lundi 3 octobre 2011 19:09, Steve Jenkins a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > it takes 5 minutes to clean the SPEC-File and remove > > these patches - really i do not understand your problem > > It takes 5 minutes for YOU to clean the SPEC file, because you're

Re: [SOLVED] Re: problem with pipe ${sender} to gnarwl when sender has BATV enabled

2011-10-03 Thread Lst_hoe02
Zitat von Simeon Ott : On 03.10.2011, at 13:13, Wietse Venema wrote: Simeon Ott: On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote: Simeon Ott: and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems? am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a bit strange to

Re: Virtual Alias Table

2011-10-03 Thread Andy Jezierski
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Andy Jezierski: >> : Recipient address rejected: >> undeliverable address: User unknown in virtual alias table; >> from= to= > > This means that there is no rule that rewrites this recipient to an > address that is not in a virtual alias doma

Re: pipe to external command - SOLVED

2011-10-03 Thread Davide Corio
On 03/ott/2011, at 19:49, Davide Corio wrote: > in main.cf i've also wrote: > virtual_transport = dovecot > i forgot a ":" after dovecot :-) cheers, -- Davide Corio enlig...@gmail.com

pipe to external command

2011-10-03 Thread Davide Corio
Hello *, i'm trying to correctly configure postfix (2.8.2) and dovecot (1.2.15) to work together on Ubuntu 11.04. everything seems to work fine but this: dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} i plac

Re: upgrade to 2.8.5 with src rpm

2011-10-03 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > it takes 5 minutes to clean the SPEC-File and remove > these patches - really i do not understand your problem It takes 5 minutes for YOU to clean the SPEC file, because you're familiar with Postfix, you know precisely what you want in a Pos

Re: upgrade to 2.8.5 with src rpm

2011-10-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.10.2011 18:48, schrieb Steve Jenkins: > Normally, I like to use RPMs when possible. However, in the case of > Postfix, I've found it's much easier, and allows for much more > flexibility, to simply declare the settings you need with "make > makefiles" and then just build from the source as

Re: upgrade to 2.8.5 with src rpm

2011-10-03 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > I would suggest you to use source code and build according to these > directions: > http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/ At the risk of sounding biased, +1 to Nikolaos' thoughts. :) >>> Ha

Re: BCC in access type

2011-10-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Ram: > On 10/01/2011 06:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Ram: > >> According to access Manpage > >> http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html > >> > >> The BCC option for a access lookup is not supported. When will > >> support for BCC be added ? > > According to the HISTORY file: > > > > 20070405 > >

Re: BCC in access type

2011-10-03 Thread Ram
On 10/01/2011 06:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Ram: According to access Manpage http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html The BCC option for a access lookup is not supported. When will support for BCC be added ? According to the HISTORY file: 20070405 Feature: BCC access/policy action

Re: [SOLVED] Re: problem with pipe ${sender} to gnarwl when sender has BATV enabled

2011-10-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Simeon Ott: > On 03.10.2011, at 13:13, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Simeon Ott: > >> > >> On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> > >>> Simeon Ott: > and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems? > am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that

Re: [SOLVED] Re: problem with pipe ${sender} to gnarwl when sender has BATV enabled

2011-10-03 Thread Simeon Ott
On 03.10.2011, at 13:13, Wietse Venema wrote: > Simeon Ott: >> >> On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote: >> >>> Simeon Ott: and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems? am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a bit strange to

Re: [SOLVED] Re: problem with pipe ${sender} to gnarwl when sender has BATV enabled

2011-10-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Simeon Ott: > > On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Simeon Ott: > >> and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems? > >> am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a > >> bit strange to me. > > > > First, few sites use BATV. > > > > S

Re: [SOLVED] Re: problem with pipe ${sender} to gnarwl when sender has BATV enabled

2011-10-03 Thread Lst_hoe02
Zitat von Simeon Ott : On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote: Simeon Ott: and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems? am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a bit strange to me. First, few sites use BATV. Second, BATV works perfect

Re: upgrade to 2.8.5 with src rpm

2011-10-03 Thread Nikolaos Milas
I would suggest you to use source code and build according to these directions: http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/ I use SASL, LDAP, TLS and all are supported with the default CentOS configuration options as described on that page. That's

[SOLVED] Re: problem with pipe ${sender} to gnarwl when sender has BATV enabled

2011-10-03 Thread Simeon Ott
On 03.10.2011, at 00:35, Wietse Venema wrote: > Simeon Ott: >> and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems? >> am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a >> bit strange to me. > > First, few sites use BATV. > > Second, BATV works perfectly fine w

Re: Different SMTP hostname greeting for each IP Address

2011-10-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:29:16 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote: RECEIVED: from www.alwaysbuywholesale.com (unknown [74.63.3.132]) by vps.velvetpixel.net Is this a DNS issue or a Postfix configuration issue? isp issue, ask them to set PTR dns for your reverse dns, most isp will if you add a A record

Re: Different SMTP hostname greeting for each IP Address

2011-10-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:25:07 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote: How can I set a different SMTP hostname greeting for each dedicated IP Address on my server? [snip] 192.0.43.11:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o myhostname=domainone.com 192.0.43.12:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o myhostname=domaintwo.com 192.