-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:21:27 +0700 Wietse Venema
wrote:
>>wh...@hushmail.com:
>> Aug 31 21:38:14 johndoe postfix/smtpd[16200]:
>> s097.networking4all.com[213.249.64.242]: TLS cipher list
>> "ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:+RC4:@STRENGTH"
>...
>> smtpd_tls_s
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 9/5/2011 11:19 AM, Michael B Allen wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> Or separate your mail and https servers to different IP addresses so
>>> it's "not the same server".
>>
>> This was actually my first thought
* Crazedfred :
> > If you use the pass above, change it now that you have sent it to public.
>
> I am substituting in fake accounts and passwords to show what's going on,
> these do not match what I am actually using :)
>
> > Where did you put smtpd.conf? On Debian it should be in
> > /etc/postf
On 9/5/2011 11:19 AM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 9/5/2011 10:50 AM, Michael B Allen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/2/2011 2:17 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> My objectives are not driven by or based
> If you use the pass above, change it now that you have sent it to public.
I am substituting in fake accounts and passwords to show what's going on, these
do not match what I am actually using :)
> Where did you put smtpd.conf? On Debian it should be in
> /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf.
On my sy
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 9/5/2011 10:50 AM, Michael B Allen wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> On 9/2/2011 2:17 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
My objectives are not driven by or based on logic. They are based on
the requirements o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/5/2011 7:26 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 3/9/2011 11:09 μμ, Noel Jones wrote: So, in order to
> implement such a solution, would it be sufficient to do
> something like the following, on the *gateway* mail server:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictio
On 9/5/2011 10:50 AM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 9/2/2011 2:17 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
>>> My objectives are not driven by or based on logic. They are based on
>>> the requirements of a consortium of credit card companies and banks.
>>
>> D
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 9/2/2011 2:17 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
>> My objectives are not driven by or based on logic. They are based on
>> the requirements of a consortium of credit card companies and banks.
>
> Do they require you to offer STARTTLS on port 25?
My
On Friday 02 September 2011 12:25:55 Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> > Michael B Allen:
> >> I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable
> >> SSLv2. If I do the following:
...
> I have to stick to the CentOS package so that I get u
On 5/9/2011 3:26 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So, in order to implement such a solution, would it be sufficient to
do something like the following, on the *gateway* mail server:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks, reject_unverified_recipient,
reject_unauth_destina
wh...@hushmail.com wrote:
The thing is I'm trying to check my SSL configuration using this
tool:
http://www.networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/report/
and while it can validate mt certificate just fine, it says that it
can't establish a secure connection.
Be aware that test site
On 3/9/2011 11:09 μμ, Noel Jones wrote:
If we use:
relay_recipient_maps =
(that is, empty) then *all* recipients for the hosted domains (those
listed in relay_domains) are accepted/forwarded?
Yes. That turns you into a backscatter source, clogging your queue
with undeliverable mail and ev
Nikolaos Milas:
> Hello,
>
> To build on CentOS from source and get an installation with standard
> features (as provided in CentOS standard Postfix RPMs) we use:
>
> make makefiles \
> CCARGS='-fPIC -DUSE_TLS -DUSE_SSL -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \
> -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" \
> -DHAS_LDAP -DLDAP
wh...@hushmail.com:
> Aug 31 21:38:14 johndoe postfix/smtpd[16200]:
> s097.networking4all.com[213.249.64.242]: TLS cipher list
> "ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:+RC4:@STRENGTH"
...
> smtpd_tls_security_level = may
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium
> smtp_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3
Comment out a
Hello,
To build on CentOS from source and get an installation with standard
features (as provided in CentOS standard Postfix RPMs) we use:
make makefiles \
CCARGS='-fPIC -DUSE_TLS -DUSE_SSL -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \
-DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" \
-DHAS_LDAP -DLDAP_DEPRECATED=1 \
-DHAS_PCRE -I/us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a postfix set-up with TLS activated.
Outlook 2010 and Thunderbird can send any e-mail just fine.
Openssl -connect -starttls smtp returned no error
either.
The thing is I'm trying to check my SSL configuration using this
tool:
http://www.
17 matches
Mail list logo