Le 14/08/2011 01:59, spamv...@googlemail.com a écrit :
> Hi..
>
> Im running postfix with amavisd-new and everything works well but when
> i send a email the Header looks like:
>
> Return-Path:
> Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34])
> by mb8-4 (Cyrus v2.1.18-IPv6-
Le 15/08/2011 17:29, Drizzt a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a setup whereby we check for spoofing. That is, anyone using an
> envelope from in our domain is blocked. In a similar fashion we stop our
> own hosts from spoofing others.
>
> For reference:
> - external spoofing:
> check_sender_access: my
Le 18/08/2011 01:31, Steve Fatula a écrit :
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: Steve Fatula
>> To: Postfix Users
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:18 PM
>> Subject: Remove header on reinjection
>>
>> Sounded easy (and probably is), but, don't see it. I know I can add
>> heade
Le 18/08/2011 14:53, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
> Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
> handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
> below:
>
> **
> According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an
On 2011-08-18 Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> 587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
>
> Says who ?
Chapter 4.3 of RFC 4409, unless I'm misunderstanding something.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning."
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:03 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Request For Port 587
>
> This is now a Draft standard, meaning you'd
On 8/18/2011 11:39 AM, Thomas Berger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 15:23:28 schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
Port 587 is AUTHORIZED submission, NOT AUTHENTICATED.
A limitation to a local network ist also a
On 2011-08-18 17:39, Thomas Berger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 15:23:28 schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
Port 587 is AUTHORIZED submission, NOT AUTHENTICATED.
Um, no.
RFC 4409, section 4.3 states that
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 15:23:28 schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
> On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > 587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
>
>
> Says who ?
Port 587 is AUTHORIZED submission, NOT AUTHENTICATED.
A limitation to a local network ist also a kind of authorization.
--
On 2011-08-18 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.08.2011 15:23, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
have you ever seen submission as open-relay?
if yes - where and why does nonone shutdown this machine?
Submission can
Am 18.08.2011 15:23, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
> On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> 587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
>
> Says who ?
have you ever seen submission as open-relay?
if yes - where and why does nonone shutdown this machine?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
--
J.
On 8/18/2011 9:13 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
Carlos,
This is a direct quote from a bot running in #postfix on freenode:
Port 587 is submission, for user submission of mail, NOT suitable for mail
exchange. See the commented example in master.cf
* Carlos Mennens :
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
> > Carlos,
> >
> > This is a direct quote from a bot running in #postfix on freenode:
> >
> > Port 587 is submission, for user submission of mail, NOT suitable for mail
> > exchange. See the commented example in master.cf. al
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> This is a direct quote from a bot running in #postfix on freenode:
>
> Port 587 is submission, for user submission of mail, NOT suitable for mail
> exchange. See the commented example in master.cf. also
> see !ms
On 8/18/2011 8:53 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email ser
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission and should be
preferred since more and more providers blocking
spam-bots by clsoing outgoing port 25 for homeusers
submission inet n - n - 50 smtpd -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o
smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
he is NOT requesting to a
* Carlos Mennens :
> Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
> handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
> below:
>
> **
> According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email server is
> supposed
Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email server is
supposed to use port 587.
Server to serve
19 matches
Mail list logo
