On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 01:04 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Or do the smart thing: use a file transfer protocol for transferring
> files instead of an email protocol. HTTP and FTP are readily available
> good examples.
We don't know why the OP wants this so it may not be that simple.
Recently I h
On 8/5/2011 9:12 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 at 15:37 CEST,
> Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
>> (base64) "final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
>> of message + attachments?
>
> The former.
On 8/5/2011 6:38 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 05.08.2011 13:31, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
>> Multiple options:
>>
>> * use a syslogd which can do filtering (syslog-ng) based on regexp
>> * or do it this way:
>>
>> main.cf:
>> syslog_facility = local4
>>
>> and in syslog.conf:
>> local4.*
On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
> any/all clients?
That sounds very wrong. What problem are you trying to solve?
-- Noel Jones
What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
any/all clients?
On 8/5/2011 2:40 PM, Ryan Buffa wrote:
> Running postfix on Max OS X Server 10.6. This servers only job is to
> relay mail from our web servers as different domains.
> A customer is saying the message envelope does not contain a domain
> name and want to know if we can get that included in the mes
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thanks. Once the sick feeling in my stomach subsided and I started
> seeing things a bit more clearly, I realized that I just probably had
> to ride it out.
Ride it out? LOL! That's probably going to get worse, if anythi
Running postfix on Max OS X Server 10.6. This servers only job is to relay
mail from our web servers as different domains.
A customer is saying the message envelope does not contain a domain name and
want to know if we can get that included in the message envelope. Log
reference below.
Thu Aug 4
Jim,
I don't see a problem, other than people trying to deliver email to your
MX to invalid recipients and from clients w/no rDNS. Your MX is rejecting
them.
My mail server handles a trivial amount of mail so I panicked upon seeing
the dramatic increase in log traffic. Further compounding ma
On 2011-08-05 16:22, Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 at 19:25 CEST,
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-08-02 06:30, Noel Butler wrote:
Has been a while since I've looked at this, but at present if we
need to alias a domain, eg f...@example.com to f...@example.net
we are using
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:23:42 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > What problem are you trying to solve?
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I've been poring over the backscatterer README and from what I can
> tell, my server isn't the problem.
I don't see a problem, other than people trying
Jim,
What problem are you trying to solve?
Thanks for the reply.
I've been poring over the backscatterer README and from what I can tell, my
server isn't the problem. Having the experts validate that will help
substantially, though. I was concerned about my server being the
backscatterer an
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:41:16 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers wrote:
[snip]
>
> Will someone please assist me in determining the problem or offer any
> short- (or long-) term suggestions? Thank you very much!
What problem are you trying to solve?
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* a
All,
My Postfix (2.7.0 Ubuntu) mail server has just begun logging several hundred
attempts of:
Aug 5 13:35:37 lollipop postfix/smtpd[23022]: connect from
unknown[173.0.131.197]
Aug 5 13:35:37 lollipop postfix/smtpd[22847]: disconnect from
joker.iwswebhosting.com[208.101.4.76]
Aug 5 13:35:37
On 8/5/2011 9:34 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos 5.6.I have configured
> postfix to server 2 virtual domains and now I need to use mailing
> list. I installed mailman-2.1.9-6.el5_6.1 when I add the virtual
> domain to /etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py and ru
Hi all
I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos 5.6.I have configured postfix
to server 2 virtual domains and now I need to use mailing list. I installed
mailman-2.1.9-6.el5_6.1 when I add the virtual domain to
/etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py and run the command /usr/lib/mailman/bin/genaliases I
got er
On 5/8/2011 5:12 μμ, Magnus Bäck wrote:
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
(base64) "final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
of message + attachments?
The former. That's the only representation of an email that's ever sent
or stored.
Thanks,
Nick
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 at 19:25 CEST,
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-08-02 06:30, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > Has been a while since I've looked at this, but at present if we
> > need to alias a domain, eg f...@example.com to f...@example.net
> > we are using mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_ali
On Friday, August 05, 2011 at 15:37 CEST,
Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
> (base64) "final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
> of message + attachments?
The former. That's the only representation of an email that's ev
G'day All,
My Postfix fu is weak these days, so I'm going to ask for a bit of
help. I've dredged-up all I could remember of advanced Postfix
techniques, trawled the various docs and HowTos, and haven't been able
to solve this.
We have multiple domains. We have one mail gateway. We have two mai
Hi everyone,
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded (base64)
"final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size of message +
attachments?
(Encoded message size should be about 30% larger than the original, so
if we want to allow attachments of max size e.g. 30
Am 05.08.2011 13:28, schrieb JEHERUL:
> Dear all
>
> By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
> I want to take the log separately.
> How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that
this is a dovecot question
so if you searach for "dovecot logging" in
On 05/08/2011 13:28, JEHERUL wrote:
> Dear all
>
> By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog. I
> want to take the log separately.
>
With rsyslog u can use 'expressions' (see the docs), u can do something similar
to rsyslog with syslog-ng
--
Simone Caruso
IT Co
* Robert Schetterer :
> or use seperate dovecot log file
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Logging
Oh yes. My solution dates back to courier-imap, where courier-imap was
not configurable at all!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Cam
Am 05.08.2011 13:31, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * JEHERUL :
>> Dear all
>>
>> By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
>> I want to take the log separately.
>>
>> How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that.
>
> :)
>
> Multiple options:
>
> * use
* JEHERUL :
> Dear all
>
> By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
> I want to take the log separately.
>
> How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that.
:)
Multiple options:
* use a syslogd which can do filtering (syslog-ng) based on regexp
* or
Dear all
By default the log created by postfix and dovecot goes to /var/log/maillog.
I want to take the log separately.
How can I do that? I googled but nothing found like that.
--
Jeherul Islam
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
India
Am 05.08.2011 10:13, schrieb Bjron Mork:
> I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases
> sending policies through postfix …
>
>
>
>
>
> *Regards,*
>
> *B~Mork*
>
Hi, search the list archives for recommands on sending
mass mails, there are tons of of good advices
I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases
sending policies through postfix
Regards,
B~Mork
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Facultad
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:57 PM
To: post
...
Ýou mean *client*.
smtp_client_restrictions = reject_unknown_client_hostname
NOTE that this is a very heavy restriction and will cause many, many
false positives.
I'll use warn-if-reject to see how is going.
Instead, use the milder (but equally effective)
smtp_client_restriction
* Geoffrey R Hardin :
> The errors are the same in verbose and in non-verbose mode.
Yes, but non-verbose mode is easier to read!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
* Stan Hoeppner :
> On 8/4/2011 9:57 AM, Alejandro Facultad wrote:
> > What is the difference if the recipients opt in receive the mails or not,
> > from the point of view of spam black lists ???
>
> No difference, if you're referring to DNSBLs. Almost all are trap
> driven.
Uhm, if somebody
32 matches
Mail list logo
