Re: slow transport and good use

On 7/20/2011 10:31 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote: > hi folks > > I just find out about slow and the table /etc/postfix/transport > > you think it useful for normal use and what are the major > providers to be added to this file > > all testimonials are welcome Like many of the tweaks in postf

slow transport and good use

hi folks I just find out about slow and the table /etc/postfix/transport you think it useful for normal use and what are the major providers to be added to this file all testimonials are welcome --  http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7  gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --re

Re: Σχετ: Anyone solely using SMTP Auth for outbound mail?

On 2011-07-20 22:15, Peter Tselios wrote: Well, since I plan to move into the Postfix wagon, from scratch, I want to learn more about the 587 port submission and the blockage of port 25 for that. What are the best practices on the matter? Are there any documents on that? Soren how do you implem

Re: With soft_bounce set to no, we are seeing a lot of send failures that look like they should be permanent 554's being handled as temporary.

Michael Orlitzky: > On 07/19/2011 09:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> > >> I think it would be useful to maintain a list of the parameters with > >> non-standard default values. I for one still notice and fix things like > >> this every few months. > >> > >> I'd be willing to look through the main.

RE: I only want to use Virtual Users - No UNIX accounts at ALL

Hello, I have used this HOWTO in the past! It worked for me http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4 Thanks, -motty From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 1:11 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.

Σχετ: Anyone solely using SMTP Auth for outbound mail?

Well, since I plan to move into the Postfix wagon, from scratch, I want to learn more about the 587 port submission and the blockage of port 25 for that. What are the best practices on the matter? Are there any documents on that? Soren how do you implement it? P. _

Re: I only want to use Virtual Users - No UNIX accounts at ALL

On 2011-07-20 21:38, Rich wrote: use sasl authentication. Apropos of what, exactly ? The OP asked about how to implement pure virtual user setups, with no system accounts receiving mail. I fail to see how SASL is involved. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Jeroen Geilman

Re: I only want to use Virtual Users - No UNIX accounts at ALL

use sasl authentication. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2011-07-20 09:44, Erik - versatel wrote: > >> Hai, >> >> I have a configuration and dont want to use UNIX account for receiving or >> sending mail. >> I want ONLY Virtual Users. >> So I did think is this possib

Re: still having problems w/ subdomain delivery

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 06:45:46PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote: > Management wants email to > user@ .arlut.utexas.edu > will be treated as though it had been addressed to > u...@arlut.utexas.edu Regardless of the MTA, this requires at the very least a wild-card MX record, do you have t

Re: rewriting local users to user@domain instat of user@host.domain

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Erik - versatel wrote: > In my configuration > as i login localy - with only a username and no domain > and i send an email to myself > it is rewriten to: user@host.domain http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#myorigin Also read the

Re: rewriting local users to user@domain instat of user@host.domain

On 7/20/2011 11:33 AM, Erik - versatel wrote: > Hai, > > In my configuration > as i login localy - with only a username and no domain > and i send an email to myself > it is rewriten to: user@host.domain > > Question: is it possible to rewrite this to user@domain > In that case locale emails come

rewriting local users to user@domain instat of user@host.domain

Hai, In my configuration as i login localy - with only a username and no domain and i send an email to myself it is rewriten to: user@host.domain Question: is it possible to rewrite this to user@domain In that case locale emails come in a mailbox i will see. Or is there an other solution to send

Re: reinjection via unix socket

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 01:49:20PM +0200, Lars T??uber wrote: > using this leads me into this error message: > mail.err: > [...] postfix/smtpd[29046]: fatal: open lock file pid/unix.../world/sname: > cannot create file exclusively: No such file or directory > > I couldn't find locking options for

Re: Maildir not automaticily added with virtual users

On 2011-07-20 09:12, Erik - versatel wrote: I use virtual users and virtual domains My virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts My virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox home_mailbox = Maildir/ In etc/postfix/vmailbox u...@example.comexample.com/user In this case my mail is not

Re: I only want to use Virtual Users - No UNIX accounts at ALL

On 2011-07-20 09:44, Erik - versatel wrote: Hai, I have a configuration and dont want to use UNIX account for receiving or sending mail. I want ONLY Virtual Users. So I did think is this possible. In my current configuration i use: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost

Re: reinjection via unix socket

Hello everybody, Am Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:43:29 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema schrieb: > Lars T?uber: > > > $ ls -ld /var/spool/postfix/private/ /var/spool/postfix/public/ > > > drwx-- 2 postfix root 4096 Jun 7 > > > 17:59 /var/spool/postfix/private/ drwx--x--- 2 postfix postdrop 4096 > > >

Re: reinjection via unix socket

Lars T?uber: > > $ ls -ld /var/spool/postfix/private/ /var/spool/postfix/public/ > > drwx-- 2 postfix root 4096 Jun 7 17:59 /var/spool/postfix/private/ > > drwx--x--- 2 postfix postdrop 4096 Jun 7 17:59 /var/spool/postfix/public/ > > > > > Am I doing something wrong? > > > > To run an

Re: reinjection via unix socket

Hi Victor, Am Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:37:56 -0400 Victor Duchovni schrieb: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Lars T??uber wrote: > > > The unix socket can't be used by other users than root or postfix. > > Is there a way to configure ownership and/or permissions for the socket? > > No, th

Re: Virtual domain aliases

What about using relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps. I am using this to forward mail do an IMAP-server, but this doesn't matter. Example modified from my config: relay_domains = ${ldap}/relay_domains.cf relay_recipient_maps = pcre:${map}/roleaccount.pcre, ${ldap}/relay_recipient_

Re: reinjection via unix socket

Sorry I had the automatic linebreaking activated in my mail program. The correct command line was this: # sudo -u postfix /usr/bin/socat - UNIX-CONNECT:/var/spool/postfix/dspam/filter 220 DSPAM LMTP 3.6.8 Ready quit 221 2.0.0 OK Best wishes Lars

Re: reinjection via unix socket

Hello Victor, Am Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:37:56 -0400 Victor Duchovni schrieb: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Lars T??uber wrote: > > > The unix socket can't be used by other users than root or postfix. > > Is there a way to configure ownership and/or permissions for the socket? > > No,

Re: Virtual domain aliases

> I have a Postfix/MailScanner front-end set up which works well, however > I'm not sure I've configured it correctly (or in the best way)... > > The box uses header_checks to place all incoming messages in the hold > queue (standard stuff) and transport_maps define which mail server the > mail ge

Virtual domain aliases

Hi all, I have a Postfix/MailScanner front-end set up which works well, however I'm not sure I've configured it correctly (or in the best way)... The box uses header_checks to place all incoming messages in the hold queue (standard stuff) and transport_maps define which mail server the mail

Re: With soft_bounce set to no, we are seeing a lot of send failures that look like they should be permanent 554's being handled as temporary.

Am 20.07.2011 05:15, schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > And a trickier one: > > * smtp_dns_resolver_options = res_defnames, in postfix <= 2.8 That would be "< 2.8". > Append the current domain name to single-component names (those > that do not contain a "." character). This can produce inco

Re: Maildir not automaticily added with virtual users

On 20/07/2011 09:12, Erik - versatel wrote: I use virtual users and virtual domains My virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts My virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox home_mailbox = Maildir/ In etc/postfix/vmailbox u...@example.comexample.com/user In this case my mail is not

I only want to use Virtual Users - No UNIX accounts at ALL

Hai, I have a configuration and dont want to use UNIX account for receiving or sending mail. I want ONLY Virtual Users. So I did think is this possible. In my current configuration i use: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost mydomain = Example.com myhostname = Mail.Ex

Maildir not automaticily added with virtual users

I use virtual users and virtual domains My virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhosts My virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox home_mailbox = Maildir/ In etc/postfix/vmailbox u...@example.comexample.com/user In this case my mail is not delivered - I get a message user is dir not f