On 16.06.2011 16:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
karave...@mail.bg:
I thought that sender_bcc_maps/recipient_bcc_maps are options to
the cleanup process, not smtpd. Will smtpd pass this informations
somehow to the cleanup process? If it could be done in this way,
I could use it and the patch is not nee
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:07:33 +0200 Anno Domini
the honourable mouss wrote using one of his/her
keyboards:
> Le 16/06/2011 22:33, Petre Bandac a écrit :
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:26:24 +0200 Anno Domini
> > the honourable mouss wrote using one of
> > his/her keyboards:
> >
> >> Le 16/06/2011 18
Le 16/06/2011 15:30, Jayanta Ghosh a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We have a mail server running on RHEL 5.3. The list of components
> installed on the server are given below:-
> 1. postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
> 2. openldap-2.3.43-3.el5
> 3. cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-4
> 4. courier-authlib-0.61.0-1.rh5Server
> 5. courier
Le 16/06/2011 22:33, Petre Bandac a écrit :
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:26:24 +0200 Anno Domini
> the honourable mouss wrote using one of his/her
> keyboards:
>
>> Le 16/06/2011 18:34, Petre Bandac a écrit :
>>> hello
>>>
>>> in the last period I had several complains about mail originating
>>> from
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:26:24 +0200 Anno Domini
the honourable mouss wrote using one of his/her
keyboards:
> Le 16/06/2011 18:34, Petre Bandac a écrit :
> > hello
> >
> > in the last period I had several complains about mail originating
> > from yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
> >
> > loggi
Le 16/06/2011 18:34, Petre Bandac a écrit :
> hello
>
> in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
> yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
>
> logging in the logs I found entries like this:
>
> ###
> Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/smtpd[27072]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 19:06, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Petre Bandac:
> > hello
> >
> > in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
> > yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
> >
> > logging in the logs I found entries like this:
> >
> > ###
> > Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/sm
Petre Bandac:
> hello
>
> in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
> yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
>
> logging in the logs I found entries like this:
>
> ###
> Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/smtpd[27072]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mail-fx0-f67.google.com[209.8
SORBS is widely considered to be overly aggressive and is probably
not a good RBL to trust fully (which is what you're doing if you
list it in a reject_rbl_client directive).
You might, at your discretion, want to include SORBS (with a low
score) in postscreen_dnsbl_sites (if you are using Postfix
Am 16.06.2011 18:34, schrieb Petre Bandac:
> hello
>
> in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
> yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
>
> logging in the logs I found entries like this:
>
> ###
> Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/smtpd[27072]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>
hello
in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
logging in the logs I found entries like this:
###
Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/smtpd[27072]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-fx0-f67.google.com[209.85.161.67]: 554 5.7.1 Service unava
As an example of how sender_bcc_maps might be specified only in a
single specific context, here is what I have been doing for some
time now.
I wanted to generate BCC copies for every message submitted by my
users (family members). In the "submission" stanza of my master.cf,
I include the followin
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> smtp-no-verp unix - - n - - smtp
> -o smtp_generic_maps=pcre:/etc/postfix/no-verp.pcre
If the set of localpart addresses that use VERP is small (perhaps just
one or two, typically "bounc
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:00:25PM +0530, Jayanta Ghosh wrote:
> Jun 16 12:54:19 mail postfix/smtpd[933]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[115.241.25.154]: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient
> address rejected: Access denied; from= to= 2...@gmail.com> proto=ESMTP helo=
The client connected from 115.241.25
Hi,
> You may want to try to put permit_sasl_authenticated before the
> reject_unknown_sender_domain
Forget this one.
> Depending on your client_access file maybe even before this one.
Maybe try this one.
I think you should also post client_access and sender_access file.
Is authentication for
Hello,
> *
> Jun 16 12:54:19 mail postfix/smtpd[933]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[115.241.25.154]: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient
> address rejected: Access denied; from= to= 2...@gmail.com> proto=ESMTP helo=
>
> When the same user is connecting to our server using Outlook 2007 it is
> working ab
Hi,
We have a mail server running on RHEL 5.3. The list of components
installed on the server are given below:-
1. postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
2. openldap-2.3.43-3.el5
3. cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-4
4. courier-authlib-0.61.0-1.rh5Server
5. courier-imap-4.4.1.20080920-1.5Server
6. maildrop-2.0.3
The problem
Use a transport map for sites that don't grok VERP-style sender
addresses, and use smtp_generic_maps to strip off the VERP portion.
UNTESTED example:
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
# NO WHITESPACE in name=value
smtp-no-verp unix - - n - - smtp
-o smtp_
karave...@mail.bg:
>I thought that sender_bcc_maps/recipient_bcc_maps are options to
>the cleanup process, not smtpd. Will smtpd pass this informations
>somehow to the cleanup process? If it could be done in this way,
>I could use it and the patch is not needed.
Correct. this happens in cleanup no
On Sat, 28 May 2011 12:27:21 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.05.2011 12:22, schrieb Wojciech Giel:
May 28 11:00:18 badger postfix/smtpd[19869]: connect from
MYISPDOMAINHOST[10.10.10.10]
May 28 11:00:18 badger postfix/smtpd[19869]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from MYISPDOMAINHOST[10.10.10.10.]: 554
On 06/16/2011 11:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/16/2011 2:39 AM, J4K wrote:
>> On 06/15/2011 09:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> When something stops working, then something has changed. You need
>>> to find out what has changed. Postfix does not change spontaneously.
>>>
>>> Wietse
>> You a
On 6/16/2011 2:39 AM, J4K wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 09:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> When something stops working, then something has changed. You need
>> to find out what has changed. Postfix does not change spontaneously.
>>
>> Wietse
> You are quite correct. Something did change, but I don
Hi All,
I have a task to configure bounce handling (parse the bounce and add
to the database data whom do not deliver)
I've done this with VERP technique
http://www.postfix.org/VERP_README.html
>Without VERP, the mailing list manager might send a message with the following
>characteristics:
>en
On 06/15/2011 09:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> JKL:
>> On 06/15/2011 06:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:43:40 AM J4K wrote:
Hi there,
Spamass-milter has stopped processing messages from Postfix. I have
tested the milter socket and it works.
> JKL:
>> The server, with the three milters, was running perfectly well until a
>> few weeks ago. All milters sockets are inside a place where Debian
>> postfix can get to.
Am 15.06.2011 21:27, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> When something stops working, then something has changed. You need
> to fin
25 matches
Mail list logo
