Hello
Does anyone is running postfix in FreeBSD "jails" environement
with success on a production server ? I'm thinking of it
and would be interrested by any successful experience.
Thank you.
In an older episode, on 2011-06-08 01:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
/^2001:638:700:1005:/, assuming a /64 or smaller subnet.
Thank you, Wietse.
I have realized that I actually need to match all IPv6 addresses
starting with
2001:638:700:, but
/^2001:638:700:/
works fine, too.
Best regards,
wolf
Wolfgang Zeikat:
> How would I specify all IPv6 addresses starting with 2001:638:700:1005
> in a regexp table?
/^2001:638:700:1005:/, assuming a /64 or smaller subnet.
But I wonder why CIDR tables would not be a better solution.
Wietse
How would I specify all IPv6 addresses starting with 2001:638:700:1005
in a regexp table?
Regards,
wolfgang
Things a beginning to become clearer to me, bit by bit. Please bear with as I
not an expert or well versed in postfix.
Yes, vmailbox contains a set of address (to address) mappings. They are
actually a combination of virtual mailbox locations as well as email addresses
of users where the emai
In message <3qpvhy2tqszh...@spike.porcupine.org>, Wietse wrote:
>> It sounds to me like you are saying that...
>>
>>:= |
>> ( [,])* []
>
>No, I wrote:
>
>One line NOT starting with REJECT or PREPEND etc., containing OTHER
>ACTIONS (note plural) than REJECT or PREPEND etc.
* Kai Wang :
>
> Hello,
>
> We have a postfix server which does forwarding messages to virtual domains.
>
>
>
> B459E38562! 118003 Tue Jun 7 10:21:49
> profs-cpsc-l-boun...@mailman.ucalgary.ca
> us...@ucalgary.ca
>
On 06/07/2011 10:42 PM, Kai Wang wrote:
Hello,
We have a postfix server which does forwarding messages to virtual domains.
B459E38562! 118003 Tue Jun 7 10:21:49
profs-cpsc-l-boun...@mailman.ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
Hello,
We have a postfix server which does forwarding messages to virtual domains.
B459E38562! 118003 Tue Jun 7 10:21:49
profs-cpsc-l-boun...@mailman.ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
> Hi list,
> Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
> hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
>
> Unfortunately this file seems to be unavailable at the moment for some
> reason.
>
> Do you guys ha
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:40:18PM -0400, Islam, Towhid wrote:
> virtual_alias_maps =
> proxy:mysql:$config/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf,hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
>
> Translated: look at the mysql first, then look at the vmailbox (db) table.
> Except, this does not appear to work. In the old
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:03:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Note the following difference.
>
> postscreen caches that the client IS NOT listed in DNSBL.
> It doesn't cache clients that are listed.
>
> DNS servers cache that the client IS listed in DNSBL.
> They don't cache non-existent DNS
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:38:44AM -0400, Michael Way wrote:
> > So why not just take MSexChange out of the picture? Set up direct
> > authentication to gmail. SASL_README.html#client_sasl just as you
> > did, setting it up to authenticate to MSexChange.
> >
> > Have your .forward invoke sendmail(1
Hi,
Le 07/06/2011 13:08, Wietse Venema a écrit :
St?phane MERLE:
problem is not even coming from him ... it's just that I never had this
kind of thing (mail in the mailq but nothing in qshape on active or
deferred).
Mailq reports mail in all Postfix queues: MAILDROP, INCOMING, ACTIVE
DEFERRED,
>> I can send emails via this system just fine using mutt or
>> whatever command line mail I like, BUT I also use fetchmail to
>> get email from our IMAP server. I then use a .forward file to
>> keep a local copy AND send a copy to gmail as a backup.
>
> Ugly and complex, but, oh well.
Until they
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:46:57PM -0400, Michael Way wrote:
> I have a setup where I use postfix to connect to my work smtpd
> exchange server via TLS encryption and normal login authentication.
> This smtpd server also requires that the "From" address in the
> email header is from the same use
Hi list,
Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
Unfortunately this file seems to be unavailable at the moment for some
reason.
Do you guys happen to know from where this file (latest) version can be
downloa
Sorry I didn't read your e-mail before hitting the send button.
You are correct about it going into a loop, and the only way to
stop it is to remove the rules in main.cf and then postfix reload.
I'm wondering why you call it "unsafe"? Is this because it will
fill up your log files if you don't rea
It seems my smtpd exchange server is still unhappy even with this last
solution. I'm getting:
"550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender (in
reply to end of DATA command))"
This follows your suggestion to put this in /etc/postfix/sender_canonical:
/./ user1.h...@work.com
Wietse Venema:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Michael Way:
> > > it would be?:
> > > if !/[[:<:]]user1\.home@work\.com$/
> > > /./ user1\.home@work\.com Don't use \ in the replacement text!
> > > endif
> >
> > Looks like you want to replace all senders in outbound email by your own
> > email address
St?phane MERLE:
> problem is not even coming from him ... it's just that I never had this
> kind of thing (mail in the mailq but nothing in qshape on active or
> deferred).
Mailq reports mail in all Postfix queues: MAILDROP, INCOMING, ACTIVE
DEFERRED, and HOLD. You were using qshape for ACTIVE
Rich Wales:
> > Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests,
> > so that it does not repeat every test for every connection.
> > This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters.
>
> Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would,
> of course, be t
> It sounds to me like you are saying that...
>
>:= |
>( [,])* []
No, I wrote:
One line NOT starting with REJECT or PREPEND etc., containing OTHER
ACTIONS (note plural) than REJECT or PREPEND etc.
Therefore: result = special | notspecial+
Learn to read what I write, no
* Rich Wales :
> value from a given list. (I won't go into the details, they would be
> off-topic here, but it's nice to have this capability.)
It will probably start a flamewar, but I personally am interested in
your particular weights on the different RBLs
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbere
* Rich Wales :
> If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists
> in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well
> remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my
> smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be redundant?
Sin
Le 07/06/2011 01:13, Wietse Venema a écrit :
St?phane MERLE:
Postfix installs its own sendmail command, to avoid breaking PHP
etc. This was a smarter move than having to re-educate people.
yes, I must agree on that ! (that's just confusing because the
/usr/sbin/sendmail is not a script but a
26 matches
Mail list logo
