Re: RFC 2822 and "From" header field

On 05/24/2011 08:44 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/24/2011 01:03 AM, Boris Korzun wrote: RFC 2822 says that originator header fields with the full name (of person who sent the message) in parentheses after address without angle brakets is legacy form. And postfix's sendmail sends message from

Re: RFC 2822 and "From" header field

On 05/24/2011 01:03 AM, Boris Korzun wrote: RFC 2822 says that originator header fields with the full name (of person who sent the message) in parentheses after address without angle brakets is legacy form. And postfix's sendmail sends message from user with the fullname in parentheses, Inco

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

LinkedIn kibirango Moses requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: -- James, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - kibirango Accept invitation from kibirango Moses http://www.linkedin.com/e/ekybff-go

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

LinkedIn kibirango Moses requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: -- James, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - kibirango Accept invitation from kibirango Moses http://www.linkedin.com/e/ekybff-go

RFC 2822 and "From" header field

RFC 2822 says that originator header fields with the full name (of person who sent the message) in parentheses after address without angle brakets is legacy form. And postfix's sendmail sends message from user with the fullname in parentheses, but Sendmail (Sendmail Consortium) sends message fro

Re: Barracuda Reputatin System and Postfix [SOLVED]

It's a terrible way to block spam. It's a GREAT way to block email. Huge difference there... ;) Jim On May 23, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Janantha Marasinghe wrote: > Dear All Postfix users who replied. > > Thanks all for your support. I got the mail admin at the otherend to white > list the IP ra

Re: Do "Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve cryptography" affect Postfix?

* Patrick Ben Koetter : > I've just come across the article "Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve > cryptography" > > and I am trying to figure out if the problem described affe

Do "Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve cryptography" affect Postfix?

I've just come across the article "Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve cryptography" and I am trying to figure out if the problem described affects Postfix and what I would nee

Re: Virtual Domains

Le 23/05/2011 19:01, Des Dougan a écrit : > > On May 2011, at 4:24 AM, Jerry wrote: > >> On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700 >> Des Dougan articulated: >> >>> Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that? >> >> Please don't top post. >> >> You might want to start here: >>

Re: Virtual Domains

On May 2011, at 4:24 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700 > Des Dougan articulated: > >> Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that? > > Please don't top post. > > You might want to start here: > . That should supply you > wit

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

On 5/23/2011 10:59 AM, yaoxing wrote: I fixed the issue you mentioned above. Now it seems all the stuck mails had went to the deferred queue, and the active queue is clear again. This is interesting. I checked some mail in the deferred queue. Most of them seems to be "Undelivered Mail Returned to

Re: ****SPAM(5.6)**** Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps question

Hi, Neil, My confusion lies in the fact that the email client campaign software is actually initiating a connection to the virtual domain, and sending the mail to it -- all on the same server, mind you -- then IT sends it out through the interface with it's virtualized IP address. I don't se

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps question

On 5/23/2011 10:19 AM, Jeffs wrote: On 5/23/2011 11:06 AM, Noel Jones wrote: The Received: header is added by the receiving system, not by your server, and always shows the IP of the connection. If you want each client to have their own identity, each client will need its own IP. You can't virt

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

I fixed the issue you mentioned above. Now it seems all the stuck mails had went to the deferred queue, and the active queue is clear again. This is interesting. I checked some mail in the deferred queue. Most of them seems to be "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender". It seems someones sent mail

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps question

On 5/23/2011 11:06 AM, Noel Jones wrote: On 5/23/2011 9:30 AM, Jeffs wrote: On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote: Hello All, Assume the following setup: Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email campaign software running

Re: Virtual Domains

Le 23/05/2011 04:50, Des Dougan a écrit : > Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that? > go step by step: add a domain in mysql, add users in mysql, ... then tell postfix to use these (virtual_mailbox_domains, virtual_mailbox_maps, ...) then test. #cat main.cf ... mysql=proxy:mysql:/etc/p

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps question

On 5/23/2011 9:30 AM, Jeffs wrote: On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote: Hello All, Assume the following setup: Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out newsl

Re: sent mail statistics - lots more than expected?

Le 23/05/2011 05:11, Troy Piggins a écrit : > * Mark Homoky wrote : >> * Monday, May 23, 2011, 12:25:40 AM, you wrote: >> >>> I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics >>> usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by >>> the amount of spam/rejections achieved usi

Re: Barracuda Reputatin System and Postfix [SOLVED]

Dear All Postfix users who replied. Thanks all for your support. I got the mail admin at the otherend to white list the IP range in question. I do believe its a silly way of blocking e-mail! On 5/23/2011 4:49 PM, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:32:25 -0700 Rich Wales articulated: Tel

smtp proxy or unified submission service ?

Hi I have same situation like this http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/273685 All I want to do is to completly separate all mail services. Now the mx service run on a different instance/s, pop/imap services also (using perdition). I still have problems with submission se

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps question

On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote: Hello All, Assume the following setup: Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out newsletters. A short time later a cli

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:26:09PM +0800, 张耀星 wrote: Please don't top-post. > > Am 23.05.2011 14:39, schrieb yaoxing: > >> May 23 07:27:36 gw1 postfix/local[7700]: fatal: main.cf configuration > >> error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller than > >> message_size_limit > And I hav

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

if there are errors they have to be cleaned all because "has been running for more than a year" is no argument since this would mean you have no problem - but you have :-) Am 23.05.2011 15:26, schrieb 张耀星: > Hi Reindl > I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be > the key

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

Hello 张耀星, Monday, May 23, 2011, 8:26:09 AM, you wrote: > Hi Reindl > I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be > the key issue, as the server has been running for more than one year > without any problem. And I haven't change anything for a long time. > What do u think

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

Hi Reindl I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be the key issue, as the server has been running for more than one year without any problem. And I haven't change anything for a long time. What do u think? Sent from my iPad 在 2011-5-23，21:00，Reindl Harald 写道： > > > Am

Re: postfix not sending out mails?

Am 23.05.2011 14:39, schrieb yaoxing: > May 23 07:27:36 gw1 postfix/local[7700]: fatal: main.cf configuration error: > mailbox_size_limit is smaller than > message_size_limit So please give us "postconf -n" or check your configuration signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

postfix not sending out mails?

Hi all, I have a mail server which has been running for more than 1 year without any problem. recently (from last Sat. exactly) some user from our website reports that he can't get his subscription email. So I checked the server, and find that the active queue is full, with more than 280M disk

Re: Unable to enforce the usage of the stronger tls ssl ciphers by Postfix

Mark Alan: > This issue is not present without postscreen. Could it be related to it or >- with the tlsproxy service? Perhaps surprisingly, both smtpd and tlsproxy specify the same parameters to OPENSSL (*). If you tweek them, then you may see differences. Wietse (*) I can't imagine why

Re: Virtual Domains

On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700 Des Dougan articulated: > Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that? Please don't top post. You might want to start here: . That should supply you with enough basic knowledge to get started. -- Jerry ✌ postf

Re: Barracuda Reputatin System and Postfix

On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:32:25 -0700 Rich Wales articulated: > > Tell the postmaster at the receiving end that they are blocking > > legitimate mail thanks to overly aggressive (ie. brain dead) > > settings from Barracuda. It should not matter at all the IP > > address of the person sending an ema

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

From: Stan Hoeppner > On 5/23/2011 2:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: >> OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers >> are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server >> for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ). >> So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists

Re: Unable to enforce the usage of the stronger tls ssl ciphers by Postfix

Mark Alan: > In any case setting 'smtpd_tls_mandatory_exclude_ciphers = AES128, DES, > MD5, aNULL' should not interfere with postfix ability to choose from > the strongest to the weakest of the remaining ciphers (as shown by > openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:@STRENGTH') > > Is it a postfix bug? If so, I

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

On 5/23/2011 2:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: > OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers > are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server > for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ). > So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists ;-) Selecting an operating sys

Re: Unable to enforce the usage of the stronger tls ssl ciphers by Postfix

On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:00:49 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Is postfix also the client? What are the settings on that > machine? Client machines use Claws Mail as MUA (configured to use SMTP at 587) and those machine have Postfix as the MTA, configured like this: $ sudo postconf -n | grep -v '^smt

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

On 05/23/2011 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 23.05.2011 10:25, schrieb Mihira Fernando: On 05/23/2011 12:32 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: agree, however somebody can search by it own here http://distrowatch.com/search.php taking it one step further : http://distrowatch.com/search.php?pkg

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

Le lundi 23 mai 2011 à 09:02 +0200, Robert Schetterer a écrit : > Am 23.05.2011 08:54, schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > > > > Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet: > >> Hello > >> > >> Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most > >> recent stable Postfix available as a package ? > >

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

Am 23.05.2011 10:25, schrieb Mihira Fernando: > On 05/23/2011 12:32 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: >> >> agree, however >> somebody can search by it own here >> http://distrowatch.com/search.php > taking it one step further : > http://distrowatch.com/search.php?pkg=postfix&pkgver=2.8.3#pkgsearch

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

On 05/23/2011 12:32 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: agree, however somebody can search by it own here http://distrowatch.com/search.php taking it one step further : http://distrowatch.com/search.php?pkg=postfix&pkgver=2.8.3#pkgsearch shows : Arch Linux: current Ark Linux: dockyard Debian GNU/Li

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: > OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers > are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server > for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ). > So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists ;-) If you're used

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps question

On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote: Hello All, Assume the following setup: Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out newsletters. A short time later a client from def.com logins to Many_Companies.com

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

On 05/23/2011 08:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet: Hello Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most recent stable Postfix available as a package ? this question is nonsense because it depends on random when was the last releease of the distribut

Re: Which Linux have the most recent Postfix ?

Am 23.05.2011 08:54, schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet: >> Hello >> >> Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most >> recent stable Postfix available as a package ? > > this question is nonsense because it depends on random > when was the last relee