OK, thanks, Wietse. I've set up my web hosting service's smarthost as
my smtp_fallback_relay (instead of making it my relayhost as before),
and I'm trying the following as my smtp_reply_filter:
if !/^5[0-9][0-9][ -]5\.1\.[0-9] /
/^5(.*)$/ 4$1
endif
which should change any 5xx-series reply code t
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:02:06PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
> Apparently cached smtp connections on the sending server (to the
> popper) are brought down early if there is nothing to send.
>
> Also apparently there is a minimum of 5 connections, had
> smtp_destination_concurrency
Rich Wales:
> > Postfix allows you to transform remote server responses into
> > arbitrary other responses. Thus, you can change a 5XX (hard reject) into
> > something else. . . . This feature is available in Postfix 2.7.
>
> I'm running 2.8.1, so that's potentially good news for me. Thanks.
>
> Postfix allows you to transform remote server responses into
> arbitrary other responses. Thus, you can change a 5XX (hard reject) into
> something else. . . . This feature is available in Postfix 2.7.
I'm running 2.8.1, so that's potentially good news for me. Thanks.
Assuming that I can use
On 04/29/2011 03:09 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote:
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
I'm sorry Dave, I cannot confirm that.
--
J.
Rich Wales:
> My sending host does, in fact, have proper FCrDNS.
>
> I've contacted AT&T in an attempt to get my IP address off their block
> list. They haven't replied yet, and since I contacted them only
> yesterday, it's too early to tell if they are going to do it or not.
>
> Distinguishing
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > This looks like a Null MX record:
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
> > >
> > > If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves
> > > email, then shouldn't postfix
My sending host does, in fact, have proper FCrDNS.
I've contacted AT&T in an attempt to get my IP address off their block
list. They haven't replied yet, and since I contacted them only
yesterday, it's too early to tell if they are going to do it or not.
Distinguishing "block list" rejections (w
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This looks like a Null MX record:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
> >
> > If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves
> > email, then shouldn't postfix reject the above message with
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:30:32AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2011-04-29 Troy Piggins wrote:
> > Check out Victor's reply to my message. He explains the reason, but
> > I was finding the same as you. This works fine so far:
> >
> > if /^Subject:/
> > if !/=\?\S+\?=(\s|$)/
> > /\S{60}/
Dragan Zubac:
> On 04/29/11 16:04, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Dragan Zubac:
> >> Apr 29 14:50:41 mx postfix/smtpd[22394]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> >> mail-fx0-f51.google.com[209.85.161.51]: 550 5.1.1
> >> : Recipient address rejected: User unknown
> >> in local recipient table; from=
> > Don't li
Hello
If you refer to parameter 'mydestination' in /etc/postfix/main.cf it
contains the following values :
mydestination = $myhostname localhost.$mydomain localhost $mydomain
myhostname = mx.domain.com
In which parameter have you spotted gmail listed as a parameter value ?
Sincerely
On 04/29/1
Dragan Zubac:
> Apr 29 14:50:41 mx postfix/smtpd[22394]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mail-fx0-f51.google.com[209.85.161.51]: 550 5.1.1
> : Recipient address rejected: User unknown
> in local recipient table; from=
Don't list gmail in mydestination.
Wietse
Hello
Here're the changed config files :
/etc/postfix/main.cf
myhostname = mx.domain.com
myorigin = /etc/mailname
mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
mydestination = $myhostname localhost.$mydomain localhost $mydomain
relayhost = [10.0.0.202
Am 29.04.2011 15:15, schrieb Бак Микаел:
> Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from
> xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx]
> Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty
> hostname
> Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name
> in resource
> Hi list,
>
> I saw this in my logs:
>
> Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from
> xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx]
> Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty
> hostname
> Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name
> in resource
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:39:45 +0530
Ravindra Gupta // Viva articulated:
> Hi Team,
>
> Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
Hi Ravindra,
Please check out: http://www.postfix.com/announcements.html
While you are at it, lose the HTML posting format style.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibe
* Ravindra Gupta // Viva :
> Hi Team,
>
> Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
Confirmed!
Hi list,
I saw this in my logs:
Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from
xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx]
Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty
hostname
Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name
in resource data of MX record fo
Am 29.04.2011 15:09, schrieb Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
> Hi Team,
>
> Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
there is nothing to confirm
the download-page says 2.8.2
http://www.postfix.org/download.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
Dragan Zubac:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to achieve the following :
>
> 1. email arrives to lo...@domain.com ,should be delivered locally to
> account local
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
# DO NOT LIST domain.com IN VIRTUAL_ALIAS_DOMAINS
# DO NOT LIS
Hello
I'm trying to achieve the following :
1. email arrives to lo...@domain.com ,should be delivered locally to
account local
2. email arrives from anyth...@anything.com to anyth...@domain.com
(excluding 'lo...@domain.com') ,the email should be forwarded to remote
smtp ([10.0.0.202]:52345) using
On 4/29/2011 6:17 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/29/2011 12:27 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Fri, April 29, 2011 4:15 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
#grep "{40}/" header_checks
/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{40}/ REJECT no spaces in subject
but I'm having a couple issues:
and I'm still getting some, is t
G?bor L?n?rt:
> > >/^Received: .*Message-ID:.*From:.*To:/ REJECT Message content seems to be
> > >spam.
> > >
> > >in header_checks pcre table.
It is theoretically possible that Message-ID: etc. appear in a
Received: header inside () which are used for comments, but this
is unlikely.
There are p
On 4/29/2011 12:27 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Fri, April 29, 2011 4:15 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
#grep "{40}/" header_checks
/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{40}/ REJECT no spaces in subject
but I'm having a couple issues:
and I'm still getting some, is this that they have a 'CR' or several at
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:12:43AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> >Received: perfectly normal things
> > can be seen here
> > because it's already our system
> >Received: from [109.91.80.133] (HELO VKYNBXL)
> > by moln-51ca578dee (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id 39875026 for
> > dma...@
On 04/29/2011 05:34 AM, Jurvis LaSalle wrote:
In the docs here: http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#external
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
...other stuff.
On 04/29/2011 08:02 AM, Rich Wales wrote:
I have a choice between sending out mail directly from my server to
a message's destination (MX host), or sending mail via my domain's
web hosting service. (Yes, my ISP really does allow me to connect
to any SMTP server, and I have a static IP address th
On 04/28/2011 11:47 PM, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
Hi,
Recently I noticed that I have mails with mail headers like this:
Received: perfectly normal things
can be seen here
because it's already our system
Received: from [109.91.80.133] (HELO VKYNBXL)
by moln-51ca578dee (8.14.3/8.14.3)
On 2011-04-29 Troy Piggins wrote:
> Check out Victor's reply to my message. He explains the reason, but
> I was finding the same as you. This works fine so far:
>
> if /^Subject:/
> if !/=\?\S+\?=(\s|$)/
> /\S{60}/REJECT no spaces
> endif
> endif
For the sake of simplicity:
if /^subjec
31 matches
Mail list logo
