Re: long (non-repeating) queue ID support

2011-03-20 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 03:57:45PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Below is the manpage entry for long queue ID support. Let me know > if there's anything missing. With the first few characters of the new long queue-id encoding the epoch-seconds time and not the micro-seconds time, it seems to me

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Raven
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 21:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 20.03.2011 21:02, schrieb Raven: > > On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 20:57 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: > >>> * David Touzeau : > >>> > Thanks for this procedure but this is not a bug/error

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.03.2011 21:02, schrieb Raven: > On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 20:57 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: >>> * David Touzeau : >>> Thanks for this procedure but this is not a bug/error request but an howto request. >>> >>> What I'm doing is this (j

Re: Postfix : Can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Connection timed out

2011-03-20 Thread JKL
On 03/20/2011 08:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > JKL: >> Hi there, >> >> This morning at 11:30am CET postfix started to log this message from >> a milter: >> >> Mar 20 19:43:39 logout postfix/cleanup[19241]: warning: milter >> unix:/spamass/spamass.sock: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet >> h

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Raven
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 20:57 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: > > * David Touzeau : > > > >> Thanks for this procedure but this is not a bug/error request but an > >> howto request. > > > > What I'm doing is this (just a few examples): > > > > alo.com

long (non-repeating) queue ID support

2011-03-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Below is the manpage entry for long queue ID support. Let me know if there's anything missing. This code is part of this weekend's snapshot (*). Several iterations have been running on my systems through the past week. Wietse (*) As of Postfix 2.9, snapshot releases happen on weekends.

Re: Postfix : Can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Connection timed out

2011-03-20 Thread Wietse Venema
JKL: > Hi there, > > This morning at 11:30am CET postfix started to log this message from > a milter: > > Mar 20 19:43:39 logout postfix/cleanup[19241]: warning: milter > unix:/spamass/spamass.sock: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet > header: Connection timed out This means that the spam

Postfix : Can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Connection timed out

2011-03-20 Thread JKL
Hi there, This morning at 11:30am CET postfix started to log this message from a milter: Mar 20 19:43:39 logout postfix/cleanup[19241]: warning: milter unix:/spamass/spamass.sock: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Connection timed out I have since removed the milter from postfix

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-03-20 3:12 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2011-03-20 2:53 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> * Charles Marcus : >> >>> Here's a site for generating a list of typos for any given domain to >>> quickly build some lists: >>> >>> http://www.selfseo.com/domain_typo_generator.php >> >> That's cool, b

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-03-20 2:53 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Charles Marcus : > >> Here's a site for generating a list of typos for any given domain to >> quickly build some lists: >> >> http://www.selfseo.com/domain_typo_generator.php > > That's cool, but I still have to check if the domain is in fact val

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Charles Marcus : > Here's a site for generating a list of typos for any given domain to > quickly build some lists: > > http://www.selfseo.com/domain_typo_generator.php That's cool, but I still have to check if the domain is in fact valid :) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteil

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.03.2011 16:49, schrieb Charles Marcus: > On 2011-03-19 3:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: >>> What I'm doing is this (just a few examples): >>> >>> alo.com error:5.1.2 You probably meant aol.com, not alo.com > >> this is a cool solution > >

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.03.2011 16:49, schrieb Charles Marcus: > On 2011-03-19 3:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: >>> What I'm doing is this (just a few examples): >>> >>> alo.com error:5.1.2 You probably meant aol.com, not alo.com > >> this is a cool solution > >

Re: Tuning queue life time against some retry errors.

2011-03-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-03-19 3:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 19.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: >> What I'm doing is this (just a few examples): >> >> alo.com error:5.1.2 You probably meant aol.com, not alo.com > this is a cool solution I agree... Here's a site for generating a list of typos