On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:17:08AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> $ ls -l /dev/urandom
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Feb 19 2008 /dev/urandom ->
> >> ../devices/pseudo/random@0:urandom
> >
> > Which version of SunOS first introduced unconditional support for
> > /dev/urandom?
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:35:48AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DNO_CLOSEFROM -DNO_DEV_URANDOM
>> -DNO_FUTIMESAT -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
>> -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -g -O -I. -I../../include -DSUNOS5 -c
>> postconf.c
>> "str_table.h", line 46: non-
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:35:48AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DNO_CLOSEFROM -DNO_DEV_URANDOM
> -DNO_FUTIMESAT -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -g -O -I. -I../../include -DSUNOS5 -c
> postconf.c
> "str_table.h", line 46:
stock Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11 fails build thus :
$ env | sort
CC=/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc
CFLAGS=-erroff -xstrconst -xildoff -xarch=386 -xnolibmil -Xa -KPIC
-xregs=no%frameptr -xlibmieee -mc -xs -g -nofstore -ftrap=%none -fsimple=0
-Qy -V -xbuiltin=%none -xchip=pentium_pro -xdebugfo
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:58:22AM +0100, Christian Roessner wrote:
> I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several
> ways do use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So
> I looked at the postfix.c code.
There is a no single "master pid". A fully-gener
Christian Roessner:
> > If you must persist along this path then I request that you stop
> > distributing Postfix. I will get all the complaints about the things
> > that you break, and I will have to deal with the consequences for
> > Postfix's reputation.
>
> Don't fear it. I am not going to do
> If you must persist along this path then I request that you stop
> distributing Postfix. I will get all the complaints about the things
> that you break, and I will have to deal with the consequences for
> Postfix's reputation.
Don't fear it. I am not going to do something that breaks postfix. T
Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> > The only supported way to start Postfix is "postfix start", using
> > the commands provided with /etc/postfix/postfix-script.
> >
> > DO NOT TINKER WITH THIS.
> >
> > SUSE people discovered years ago that their home-grown approach to
> > stop Postfix would termi
Hi,
> The only supported way to start Postfix is "postfix start", using
> the commands provided with /etc/postfix/postfix-script.
>
> DO NOT TINKER WITH THIS.
>
> SUSE people discovered years ago that their home-grown approach to
> stop Postfix would terminate a lot more processes than just Po
Christian Roessner:
>
> I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several way
>-s do use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So I looke
>-d at the postfix.c code.
The only supported way to start Postfix is "postfix start", using
the commands provided with
Hi,
I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several ways do
use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So I looked at the
postfix.c code.
Is it a problem to start /usr/lib/postfix/master -c /etc/postfix from the init
system? I believe I have seen in ups
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:52:17PM -0800, Luis Esteves wrote:
>
> Many Thanks Victor for the answer.
An answer anyway, there are a few ways to address this... Some people
would use tools like "cfengine" or similar. Basically, anything that
lets you manage configuration files on multiple Unix hos
Many Thanks Victor for the answer.
Luis
Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:18:07PM -0800, Luis Esteves wrote:
>
>> In our organisation we have 4 postfix servers.
>>
>> Each time i need to add a new configuration to the transport file (for a
>> new
>> domain), i need to upd
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:18:07PM -0800, Luis Esteves wrote:
> In our organisation we have 4 postfix servers.
>
> Each time i need to add a new configuration to the transport file (for a new
> domain), i need to update the transport file on each server.
> This is cumbersome. Connect on each se
Hi everybody,
In our organisation we have 4 postfix servers.
Each time i need to add a new configuration to the transport file (for a new
domain), i need to update the transport file on each server.
This is cumbersome. Connect on each server with ssh, update the transport
file, et run make to
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:52:54PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > If one wants to avoid whitelisting bots that only connect to backup MX
> > > hosts, appropriate configuration in the backup MX postscreen. I am not
> > > sure how this part of the design
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:47:16PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> ~# postconf -d|grep default_database_type
> >>
> >> If that command returns "default_database_type = hash" then yes, you
> >> should postmap the file.
> >
> > Not "postconf -d", just "postconf". The default database type should
>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:52:54PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > If one wants to avoid whitelisting bots that only connect to backup MX
> > hosts, appropriate configuration in the backup MX postscreen. I am not
> > sure how this part of the design works, is that we expect that
Victor Duchovni put forth on 2/23/2011 12:39 PM:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:17:18PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Matteo Cazzador put forth on 2/23/2011 11:49 AM:
>>> Thank's a lot , i need to do the postmap command on sender_access files?
>>
>>> Il 22/02/2011 22:24, Victor Duchovni ha scrit
Victor Duchovni:
> If one wants to avoid whitelisting bots that only connect to backup MX
> hosts, appropriate configuration in the backup MX postscreen. I am not
> sure how this part of the design works, is that we expect that bot to
> fail the test via the backup IP, or are we trying to not white
On 2011-02-24 9:46 AM, sunhux G wrote:
> I removed the "-D" from master.cf & restarted postfix
You *still* have verbose logging enabled.
No one is going to even *try* to help you if you cannot follow the
simplest of instructions.
If you are positive that you have removed the -v from the correct
Matthias Egger:
> On 02/24/2011 05:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Listening on primary and backup MX addresses
> >
> > This week I was doing some expiriments: I configured Postfix to
> > make postscreen listen on both primary AND backup MX addresses.
>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:02:42PM +0100, Matthias Egger wrote:
>> Listening on primary and backup MX addresses
>>
>> This week I was doing some expiriments: I configured Postfix to
>> make postscreen listen on both primary AND backup MX addresses.
>> T
On 02/24/2011 05:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Listening on primary and backup MX addresses
This week I was doing some expiriments: I configured Postfix to
make postscreen listen on both primary AND backup MX addresses.
This was a matter of adding a seco
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:37:55AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> Some mail clients have similar features for mail list support. This isn't
> something postfix can do.
Indeed with just a bit of sweat, Mutt's list-reply feature and send-hooks
get the job done:
lists postfix-users@postfix.org
On 2/24/2011 10:06 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Christian Roessner wrote:
In detail I have a couple of defined addresses that I all use for
mailing lists.
c+some_extens...@roessner-network-solutions.com
There are two problems with it:
1. I must choose t
Subject: postscreen deep protocol tests without mail delays
The problem
===
The Postfix postscreen daemon is a light-weight front end that
eliminates spambots before they can suck up limited Postfix SMTP
server resources. This feature is available with the Postfix 2.8
stable release, and i
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Christian Roessner wrote:
> In detail I have a couple of defined addresses that I all use for
> mailing lists.
>
> c+some_extens...@roessner-network-solutions.com
>
> There are two problems with it:
> 1. I must choose the correct address that belongs to
Hi,
since I started using mail addresses with an extension, it lately
happened that I forgot to choose the "right" address for sending out
mail.
In detail I have a couple of defined addresses that I all use for
mailing lists.
c+some_extens...@roessner-network-solutions.com
There are two problem
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:52:30AM +0200, Etienne Pretorius wrote:
> I have a email address say staff@domain that maps perfectly to all its
> intended recipients,
> but on the same machine I have user1@domain that is suppose to map to
> user1@domain,user2@domain but it does not.
Address mapping
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:26:59AM +, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> I have a postfix box which handles some smtp accounts for example.com. Not
> all example.com accounts are located on this postfix box, but are located
> elsewhere on another server.
>
> At the minute, for the accounts which are
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:29:50AM +0100, Stanis??aw Findeisen wrote:
> The puzzling thing is also this one:
>
> $ host 74.125.43.27
> 27.43.125.74.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer bw-in-f27.1e100.net.
Lets guess what "1e100.net" is: looks like "scientific notation" for 1
times 10 to the 100th p
On 2/24/2011 9:00 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Thank's !
but i don't need permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks?
it's default?
[please bottom-post on this list]
No, you don't need those in smtpd_sender_restrictions.
-- Noel Jones
On 2/24/2011 8:46 AM, sunhux G wrote:
I removed the "-D" from master.cf& restarted postfix&
stumble upon something weird just after the restart which
made me believe there could be multiple smtp processes :
I think you're wasting everyone's time, including your own.
Provide the information yo
Thank's !
but i don't need permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks?
it's default?
Il 24/02/2011 15:53, Noel Jones ha scritto:
On 2/24/2011 6:35 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
I made this
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access,permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,pe
On 2/24/2011 6:35 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
I made this
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access,permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,permit
like this:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
You don't need the permit* here.
I removed the "-D" from master.cf & restarted postfix &
stumble upon something weird just after the restart which
made me believe there could be multiple smtp processes :
(btw, the shutting down flashed out as "failed" in red, while
the startup flashed out as "OK" in green) :
# netstat -antp
On 24/02/2011 09:57, Corey Quinn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Etienne Pretorius wrote:
Hello List,
I have a email address say staff@domain that maps perfectly to all its intended
recipients,
but on the same machine I have user1@domain th
I made this
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access,permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,permit
is it correct?
in sender_access i wrote
i...@myexample.com REJECT
thank's
Il 23/02/2011 19:39, Victor Duchovni ha scritto:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:17:18PM -0600, S
Stanis??aw Findeisen:
> Hi
>
> I am getting such errors in the log:
>
> Feb 24 10:03:21 * postfix/smtp[9203]: C2EFF1823C1: lost connection with
> ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM[74.125.43.27] while sending end of data -- message
> may be sent more than once
>
> This happens many times a day with various serv
On 24/02/11 09:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.02.2011 10:54, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
On 24/02/11 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
We implemented this in our postfix/dbmail-setup this way
You can do this also with config-files but i never setup
any server without mysql-backends
transport_maps =
Am 24.02.2011 10:54, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
>
> On 24/02/11 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> We implemented this in our postfix/dbmail-setup this way
>> You can do this also with config-files but i never setup
>> any server without mysql-backends
>>
>> transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql
On 24/02/11 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
We implemented this in our postfix/dbmail-setup this way
You can do this also with config-files but i never setup
any server without mysql-backends
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf
cat /etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf
user =
We implemented this in our postfix/dbmail-setup this way
You can do this also with config-files but i never setup
any server without mysql-backends
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf
cat /etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf
user = dbmailro
password =
dbname
Hi
I am getting such errors in the log:
Feb 24 10:03:21 * postfix/smtp[9203]: C2EFF1823C1: lost connection with
ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM[74.125.43.27] while sending end of data -- message
may be sent more than once
This happens many times a day with various servers --- not just
google.com. Otherwise e
Hi Everyone,
I have a postfix box which handles some smtp accounts for example.com.
Not all example.com accounts are located on this postfix box, but are
located elsewhere on another server.
At the minute, for the accounts which aren’t on this server, postfix is
saying "user unknown in virtu
46 matches
Mail list logo
