Happy New Year to you all.
This is a "best practices" question for other Postfix users who may be using
Postfix to send email to large opt-in mailing lists.
We have a subscriber list of 1MM+ registered members of a popular video game
website. The vast majority of them are also opted in for our mo
On 1/1/2011 6:42 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
On Jan 1, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/01/11 21:37, jason hirsh wrote:
I can not find any info where the config file is suppose to
be..
Create the file /etc/sysconfig/postgrey
I have no such directory
i am running freebsd 8.0
If
On Jan 1, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/01/11 21:37, jason hirsh wrote:
I can not find any info where the config file is suppose to be..
Create the file /etc/sysconfig/postgrey
I have no such directory
i am running freebsd 8.0
and add desired options like so:
OPTIONS="-
On 01/01/11 21:37, jason hirsh wrote:
I can not find any info where the config file is suppose to be..
Create the file /etc/sysconfig/postgrey
and add desired options like so:
OPTIONS="--delay=30 --auto-whitelist-clients=1"
Hope that helps.
Il 01/01/2011 17:47, Gian Carlo Stagni ha scritto:
/usr/local/sbin/postgrey --pidfile=/var/run/postgrey.pid --inet=10023 -d
--user=postgrey --group=postgrey --dbd
The "-d" parameter set the amount of seconds...
Shame on me, I was obviously thinking to "--delay".
gc :-)
Hi,
>
> What's wrong with postqueue -f?
>
>
> config_directory = /usr/local/etc/postfix
>
What, if you specify
postqueue -c /usr/local/etc/postfix -f
Christian
Jack Raats:
> I was the one which gave postqueue -f (as root on FreeBSD 7.4-PRERELEASE)
> Normally It tries to flush the queue, trying to deliver the mail in the
> queue.
>
> At this moment nothing happend. I got the fatal usage logging in my logfile.
>
> So again. Is this a bug or is there some
Hi,
Den 01. jan. 2011 22:14, skrev Jack Raats:
Reposting, because it looks like it didn't reached the mailinglist.
It did.
I'm sorry. Excuse me!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f
|
postqueue -i queueid | postqueue -
On Jan 1, 2011, at 4:45 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von jason hirsh :
OK Everyone was such a help that I am back.. I got a new server and
thought things were going great
The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message i have
tried to debug using my mac.com, comcast.net h
Den 01. jan. 2011 22:14, skrev Jack Raats:
Reposting, because it looks like it didn't reached the mailinglist.
It did.
Hi eryone,
Happy new year!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f |
postqueue -i queueid | postqueue -p |
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 1/1/2011 9:50 AM:
> > Stan Hoeppner:
> >> jason hirsh put forth on 12/31/2010 3:38 PM:
> >>
> >>> Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna postfix/smtpd[2514]: >
> >>> asmtpout029.mac.com[17.148.16.104]: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients
> >>
> >> Am I the only one that n
Reposting, because it looks like it didn't reached the mailinglist.
Hi eryone,
Happy new year!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f |
postqueue -i queueid | postqueue -p | postqueue -s site
Output postconf -n:
orac# postcon
Zitat von jason hirsh :
OK Everyone was such a help that I am back.. I got a new server and
thought things were going great
The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message i have tried
to debug using my mac.com, comcast.net hotmail.com
in all instances it kept boucing the mail until
Wietse Venema put forth on 1/1/2011 9:50 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> jason hirsh put forth on 12/31/2010 3:38 PM:
>>
>>> Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna postfix/smtpd[2514]: >
>>> asmtpout029.mac.com[17.148.16.104]: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients
>>
>> Am I the only one that noticed this^? Or, am I the onl
Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> do you have nearer information on this:
>
> Jan 1 06:35:00 mx postfix/postscreen[5599]: close database
> /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory (possible Berkeley DB
> bug)
Citing from the Postfix dict_db.c module:
/*
* With some Berkel
Il 31/12/2010 22:13, jason hirsh ha scritto:
The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message...
Freebsd 8.0
I use Debian, but the configuration may be similar.
Postgrey is running as follows:
postgrey 1258 0.0 1.0 12196 10144 ?? Ss 3:05PM 0:00.21
/usr/local/sbin/postgrey --pidfile=/
Hi,
do you have nearer information on this:
Jan 1 06:35:00 mx postfix/postscreen[5599]: close database
/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory (possible Berkeley DB
bug)
Jan 1 07:16:56 mx postfix/postscreen[6289]: close database
/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or d
Stan Hoeppner:
> jason hirsh put forth on 12/31/2010 3:38 PM:
>
> > Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna postfix/smtpd[2514]: >
> > asmtpout029.mac.com[17.148.16.104]: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients
>
> Am I the only one that noticed this^? Or, am I the only one that
> (mistakenly?) thinks it may be relev
On Jan 1, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 06:26:41PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
Where is the rest of this log entry, it too is truncated... Where
are
the other instances of this same client/sender/recipient triple
being
rejected?
Dec 31 00:03:02 tuna po
jason hirsh put forth on 12/31/2010 3:38 PM:
> Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna postfix/smtpd[2514]: >
> asmtpout029.mac.com[17.148.16.104]: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients
Am I the only one that noticed this^? Or, am I the only one that
(mistakenly?) thinks it may be relevant?
Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna p
20 matches
Mail list logo
