Hi eryone,
Happy new year!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f
| postqueue -i queueid | postqueue -p | postqueue -s site
postqueue -f also doesn't flush the queue.
grtz.
Jack
Hi eryone,
Happy new year!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f |
postqueue -i queueid | postqueue -p | postqueue -s site
Output postconf -n:
orac# postconf -n
address_verify_map = btree:/var/db/postfix/verifymap
address_v
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 06:26:41PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
>> Where is the rest of this log entry, it too is truncated... Where are
>> the other instances of this same client/sender/recipient triple being
>> rejected?
>
> Dec 31 00:03:02 tuna postfix/smtpd[8857]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> s
On 12/31/10 11:26 PM, jason hirsh wrote:
Dec 31 00:03:02 tuna postfix/smtpd[8857]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
snt0-omc1-s51.snt0.hotmail.com[65.54.61.88]: 450 4.2.0
: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see
http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/kasdivi.com.html;
from= to= proto=ESMTP
helo=
On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:38:17PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:13:24PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
I get repeated 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address
rejected:
Greyl
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:38:17PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:13:24PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
>>
>>> I get repeated 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address
>>> rejected:
>>> Greylisted,
>>
>> This log entry is over-r
On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:13:24PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
I get repeated 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address
rejected:
Greylisted,
This log entry is over-redacted. Show *all* log entries for this
message
being refused, IN FULL, includi
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:13:24PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote:
> I get repeated 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address rejected:
> Greylisted,
This log entry is over-redacted. Show *all* log entries for this message
being refused, IN FULL, including dates, client IPs, envelope sender
address, ...
--
OK Everyone was such a help that I am back.. I got a new server and
thought things were going great
The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message i have tried
to debug using my mac.com, comcast.net hotmail.com
in all instances it kept boucing the mail until I entered the server
in
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:03:03PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-12-29 12:45 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:29:18AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> I was wondering if it is possible to 'include' the contents of a file in
> >> the mysql*.cf map files (although
On 2010-12-29 12:45 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:29:18AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> I was wondering if it is possible to 'include' the contents of a file in
>> the mysql*.cf map files (although I guess if you can with these you can
>> with others)...
> Use make(1) (
On 2010-12-29 10:14 AM, Joan Moreau wrote:
> But I have no " car to fix" . What is that story about ?
In your first post, you vaguely described a 'problem':
"the postfix queue manager (qmgr) is taking far too much resources when
the number of email pending is growing."
> Now, I did not rule out
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:52:04PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. How does this configuration determine if all
> mail from a client should be relayed, or only the mail allowed by the
> allowed-sender/allowed-recipient rules? There are some hosts I don't
> want
Thanks for your reply. How does this configuration determine if all mail from a
client should be relayed, or only the mail allowed by the
allowed-sender/allowed-recipient rules? There are some hosts I don't want
subjected to those rules.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@pos
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:24:13PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Thanks again for trying to help, Viktor, but I'm unable to ascertain
> how your suggested configuration fulfills my goal. It appears to me that
> your config discards mail from all clients unless they're listed in the
Thanks again for trying to help, Viktor, but I'm unable to ascertain how your
suggested configuration fulfills my goal. It appears to me that your config
discards mail from all clients unless they're listed in the allowed-clients
table. This isn't what I'm after. What I'm after is for all client
> TLS <=> plaintext translation for more than one SMTP client, but
> > thanks to careful planning, it worked out of the box.
>
> This is uploaded as postfix-2.8-20101230-nonprod. The code has had
> limited testing, so keep an eye on things if you intend to expose
> it to the
Rob van Dam put forth on 12/30/2010 3:25 PM:
> Seems Centos 5.5 is shipping an old version of Postfix.
Debian Stable has a reputation of shipping with dinosaur packages.
CentOS ships with stuff that existed before the first DNA chains
appeared in the primordial soup. :)
Luckily for you Simon Mud
Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> > This is uploaded as postfix-2.8-20101230-nonprod. The code has had
> > limited testing, so keep an eye on things if you intend to expose
> > it to the network.
>
> Minor questions:
>
> postfix/tlsproxy[30864]: CONNECT [2a01:4f8:120:31e2::165]51824
Right. This is
Hi,
> This is uploaded as postfix-2.8-20101230-nonprod. The code has had
> limited testing, so keep an eye on things if you intend to expose
> it to the network.
Minor questions:
postfix/tlsproxy[30864]: CONNECT [2a01:4f8:120:31e2::165]51824
It is just, because I saw it: Missing ":" between add
Postfix works perfectly now. Thank you SkykingOH on the
http://fonality.com/trixbox/forums/trixbox-ce-development-forum/general-development/postfix-sasl-related-problem#comment-182659
forum for instructions how to update postfix on Centos.
And of course a big thanks here for helping me to find
21 matches
Mail list logo
