Re: PREPEND problems

mouss wrote: > anyway, reading your prepend info tells us that you're trying to do > something regarding spamhaus based on the From header. This is most > probably wrong. if you tell us what you're trying to do, we will tell > you why you are wrong ;-p If we are talking about VBR-Info based on a D

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 04:59:16 am Victor Duchovni wrote: > Historically, Outlook Express would generate and re-assemble large > messages via message/partial MIME encapsulation. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2046#section-5.2.2 > > This format is not directly supported by most MUAs

Re: tagging instead of rejecting?

Phil Howard: > For some of the smtpd restrictions I would like to merely tag a > message instead of outright reject it. It would be either delivered > as usual with the tagging in place for the client or user agent to > check for, or be used to deliver the mail to a special folder. If the > taggi

Re: PREPEND problems

Hi all, really thanks for all info, but the problem already is fixed. It needed help here for the check_sender_access adding to smtpd_data_restrictions and the help of Mark Martinec for amavisd-new, to get header_checks working in a dual setup MSA/MTA. Many thanks for all your help. It works

Re: avoiding externals spammesr that pretend to be in my domain

Le 20/12/2010 15:49, Frank Bonnet a écrit : Hello I receive periodically some spams that pretend to be from my domain. Looking in emaila headers I can see where the email come from Received: from 174.subnet222-124-154.static.astinet.telkom.net.id (unknown [222.124.154.172]) Of course the head

Re: PREPEND problems

Le 20/12/2010 17:55, Christian Roessner a écrit : Yes, that will work fine if you put your check_sender_access rule under smtpd_data_restrictions. I am unsure if that works. I thought that check_sender_access only uses the envelope-from tag. It is. So where is the difference between pu

tagging instead of rejecting?

For some of the smtpd restrictions I would like to merely tag a message instead of outright reject it. It would be either delivered as usual with the tagging in place for the client or user agent to check for, or be used to deliver the mail to a special folder. If the tagging is done by adding "+

Re: qmgr killed by signal 15

On 12/18/2010 11:03 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: postfix/master[20377]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/qmgr pid 20380 killed by signal 15 This is SIGTERM. Are you running "postfix stop" frequently? No. In fact I'm not running it at all. In fact in the interest of troubleshooting this,

Re: Transport maps with LDAP.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:17:08PM -0200, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote: > I'm using Postfix 2.7.0. Good, this is a reasonably recent release. You may want to consider updating to 2.7.2: 20100515 Bugfix (introduced Postfix 2.6): the Postfix SMTP client XFORWARD implement

Transport maps with LDAP.

I'm using Postfix 2.7.0. I use LDAP do manage/list domains that I relay for. My problem is, when mail arrives to a domain I make relay for, and this account has an alias to another domain I also relay for, the transport to the second e-mail is not found. Suppose I relay for both dom

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:11:16PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: > I'm searching for an automated solution that will split > bigs emails in several parts ( as we do with mpack manually ) > then reassemble them at reception. > > It would be transparent for the user that would > receive only one big em

Re: PREPEND problems

>> With the default smtpd_delay_reject=yes, smtpd_{client, helo, sender, >> recipient}_restrictions are repeated for each recipient, but >> smtpd_data_restrictions are run only once. >> > That is really good to know and makes things much easier now. I give it a try. Thanks :-) Works. It is fru

Re: PREPEND problems

>> DATA >> . <-- Testing after this point, if in smtpd_data_restrictions. But >> does this behave differently then the above? > > > Of course it works. And BTW, smtpd_data_restrictions are run after the DATA > command, not after the dot -- that's smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions. > :-) > With

Re: PREPEND problems

On 12/20/2010 10:55 AM, Christian Roessner wrote: Yes, that will work fine if you put your check_sender_access rule under smtpd_data_restrictions. I am unsure if that works. I thought that check_sender_access only uses the envelope-from tag. So where is the difference between putting it in

Re: PREPEND problems

> > Yes, that will work fine if you put your check_sender_access rule under > smtpd_data_restrictions. > I am unsure if that works. I thought that check_sender_access only uses the envelope-from tag. So where is the difference between putting it in smtpd_recipient_restrictions or waiting for

Re: Precedence header

On 12/20/2010 10:49 AM, Martin Spinassi wrote: Hello postfix list! I've recently checked the gmail bulk mail guidelines, and I've seen that they recommend this header in the email: "Precedence: bulk" The source is this URL: https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=81126#format We h

Precedence header

Hello postfix list! I've recently checked the gmail bulk mail guidelines, and I've seen that they recommend this header in the email: "Precedence: bulk" The source is this URL: https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=81126#format We have a designed our own mail server for clients al

Re: hook for message delivery notification?

On 12/20/10 4:29 PM, Ronald Klop wrote: Hello, I would like to have a program called when a message is delivered in a mailbox. I'm currently trying this with a filter, which gives me a race condition between real delivery and the moment my hook/filter runs. That sounds wrong. Any of the avai

Re: PREPEND problems

On 12/20/2010 8:37 AM, Christian Roessner wrote: Hi, I am a little bit stuck with prepending one and exactly one additional header to outgoing mails that are sent from local users. In fact I want to add a VBR-Info:- header for outgoing mails. Local users use a seperate MSA port (own IP-socket

Re: avoiding externals spammesr that pretend to be in my domain

On 12/20/10 3:49 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello I receive periodically some spams that pretend to be from my domain. If this is in the From: header, there's not much you can do about that. The envelope sender you can trivially protect. After you have allowed submission, and have passed $mynetw

hook for message delivery notification?

Hello, I would like to have a program called when a message is delivered in a mailbox. I'm currently trying this with a filter, which gives me a race condition between real delivery and the moment my hook/filter runs. I (partly) understand I can do this with a 'maildrop' program, but would like

Re: PREPEND problems

Hi again, > # header_checks > > if !/^VBR-Info:.*roessner-net(work-solutions)?/ > /^From:@roessner-net\.com/ PREPEND VBR-Info: > md=roessner-net.com; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org; mc=all > /^From:@roessner-network-solutions\.com/ PREPEND VBR-Info: > md=roessner-network-solution

Re: avoiding externals spammesr that pretend to be in my domain

* Frank Bonnet : > Hello > > I receive periodically some spams that pretend to be > from my domain. > > Looking in emaila headers I can see where the email come from > > Received: from 174.subnet222-124-154.static.astinet.telkom.net.id > (unknown [222.124.154.172]) http://www.spamhaus.org/query

avoiding externals spammesr that pretend to be in my domain

Hello I receive periodically some spams that pretend to be from my domain. Looking in emaila headers I can see where the email come from Received: from 174.subnet222-124-154.static.astinet.telkom.net.id (unknown [222.124.154.172]) Of course the header has been rewrited but is there a possibi

PREPEND problems

Hi, I am a little bit stuck with prepending one and exactly one additional header to outgoing mails that are sent from local users. In fact I want to add a VBR-Info:- header for outgoing mails. Local users use a seperate MSA port (own IP-socket in master.cf). The socket is configured with smtp

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

Le 20/12/2010 13:11, Frank Bonnet a écrit : Hello I'm searching for an automated solution that will split bigs emails in several parts ( as we do with mpack manually ) then reassemble them at reception. It would be transparent for the user that would receive only one big email. Do you mean

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

On Monday 20 December 2010 13:22:25 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Thanks for the reply > > My purpose is for internals emails use only ! so the control would be OK If it is for internal email only, why do you want to split up the emails? If it's because postfix rejects too large emails you can always inc

Re: MX2

On 2010-12-20 2:03 AM, Ramesh wrote: > I am planning to configure backup MX for primary MX. i have few > queries.. > Please send suggestion's or URL to know more about this. Don't bother... backup MX's should only be implemented by those who have a very good reason for doing so, and are a total

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

Thanks for the reply My purpose is for internals emails use only ! so the control would be OK On 12/20/2010 01:17 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Monday 20 December 2010 13:11:16 Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello I'm searching for an automated solution that will split bigs emails in several parts ( as

Re: automatic email reassembly at reception ?

On Monday 20 December 2010 13:11:16 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I'm searching for an automated solution that will split > bigs emails in several parts ( as we do with mpack manually ) > then reassemble them at reception. > > It would be transparent for the user that would > receive only one b

automatic email reassembly at reception ?

Hello I'm searching for an automated solution that will split bigs emails in several parts ( as we do with mpack manually ) then reassemble them at reception. It would be transparent for the user that would receive only one big email. Any infos welcome Thanks

Re: MX2

On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 07:03 +, Ramesh wrote: > HI All, > > I am planning to configure backup MX for primary MX. i have few queries.. > > All email id's in primary MX need to be same in secondary MX? > Is it possible to configure separate email clients to receive and send for > both mail serv

Ji-fang Zhang/Poughkeepsie/IBM is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 12/20/2010 and will not return until 01/04/2011.

Re: disable delivery-status on expire messages

On 12/20/2010 12:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * alex: Hi how can I disable notifications for expire messages. DBA9ED01B53: from=, status=expired, returned to sender DBA9ED01B53: sender non-delivery notification: E737FD0192B I want to disable notification for expire messages but not for boun

Re: disable delivery-status on expire messages

* alex : > Hi > > how can I disable notifications for expire messages. > > DBA9ED01B53: from=, status=expired, returned to sender > DBA9ED01B53: sender non-delivery notification: E737FD0192B > > I want to disable notification for expire messages but not for bounces. You can't. It's a bounce in

disable delivery-status on expire messages

Hi how can I disable notifications for expire messages. DBA9ED01B53: from=, status=expired, returned to sender DBA9ED01B53: sender non-delivery notification: E737FD0192B I want to disable notification for expire messages but not for bounces.

Re: Limiting delivery rate for a specific destination

Oh thanks ! This is great ;) Regards Lionel 2010/12/20 mouss > Le 20/12/2010 10:39, Lionel TRESSENS a écrit : > >> Hello Postfix happy users ! >> >> I am trying to figure out if it is possible to limit the delivery >> concurrency for some destinations. >> >> For example : >> - emails matchi

Re: Limiting delivery rate for a specific destination

Le 20/12/2010 10:39, Lionel TRESSENS a écrit : Hello Postfix happy users ! I am trying to figure out if it is possible to limit the delivery concurrency for some destinations. For example : - emails matching patterns "@foo.com " and "@bar.com " must be sent wit

Re: MX2

Le 20/12/2010 08:03, Ramesh a écrit : HI All, I am planning to configure backup MX for primary MX. i have few queries.. All email id's in primary MX need to be same in secondary MX? yes. and all checks done on the primary should be done on the secondary as well. also, if the secondary pas

Limiting delivery rate for a specific destination

Hello Postfix happy users ! I am trying to figure out if it is possible to limit the delivery concurrency for some destinations. For example : - emails matching patterns "@foo.com" and "@bar.com" must be sent with a slow delivery concurrency - other emails must be sent with (let's say) default

Re: how do I send all NDR reports to one email address?

Thanks Jeroen, adding bounce,2bounce to notify_classes did exactly what I was looking for. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:45, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 12/18/10 8:16 PM, John Brahy wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm having a problem configuring what I thought would be a postmaster >> account alias but