Am 14.11.2010 05:18, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 04:23:15AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>> On fre 12 nov 2010 19:08:57 CET, mouss wrote
>>
>>> the "general" syntax is
>>> sendmail -f sender rcpt1 rcpt2 ... < messagefile
>
> The correct syntax is:
>
> sendmail -i
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 04:23:15AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On fre 12 nov 2010 19:08:57 CET, mouss wrote
>
>> the "general" syntax is
>> sendmail -f sender rcpt1 rcpt2 ... < messagefile
The correct syntax is:
sendmail -i -f "$sender" -- "$rcpt1" "$rcpt2" ... < "$file"
The "-i" an
On fre 12 nov 2010 19:08:57 CET, mouss wrote
the "general" syntax is
sendmail -f sender rcpt1 rcpt2 ... < messagefile
but I have no idea how to run this from a dovecot sieve script...
sieve cant run external tools like sendmail, its not even sieve in lda
if you like to have any case
On 11/13/2010 3:26 PM, Agnello George wrote:
Hi
Since my server does not relay directly to the internet , i have
tried to relay mails via gmail using tls and was quite successful ,
my main.cf details is as follows :
myhostname = mail.server.com
relayhost = smtp.gmail.com:587
# auth
smtp_sasl_
Hi
Since my server does not relay directly to the internet , i have
tried to relay mails via gmail using tls and was quite successful ,
my main.cf details is as follows :
myhostname = mail.server.com
relayhost = smtp.gmail.com:587
# auth
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = has
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:16:49PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> As Jeroen mentioned, header_checks(5) REPLACE or IGNORE action does
> this, no patching nor recompile needed. Search the list archives,
> there have been examples to do this very thing posted before. No,
> your requirement is not so u
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:51:53PM +0100, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
> I have to setup a postfix mailserver with speecial requirements
> from the customer side:
>
> They do not want their sender IP addresses being visible in the
> mailheader as seen by the recipients. Reason: They sometimes
> also
On 13/11/10 08:53, mouss wrote:
Le 12/11/2010 20:03, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:06:46AM -0800, Rob Tanner wrote:
Our admissions office sends out mass mailings to prospective students,
anywhere from 5,000 to 25,000 at a time. They are mail-merged and
sent via
outlo
On 11/13/2010 06:51 PM, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have to setup a postfix mailserver with speecial requirements from the
customer side:
They do not want their sender IP addresses being visible in the mailheader
as seen by the recipients. Reason: They sometimes also communicate
Hello everybody,
I have to setup a postfix mailserver with speecial requirements from the
customer side:
They do not want their sender IP addresses being visible in the mailheader
as seen by the recipients. Reason: They sometimes also communicate with
competitors and they fear to get spied th
On 11/13/2010 05:28 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my
logs, that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL,
mainly Spamhaus ins
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my logs,
that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL, mainly
Spamhaus instead of failing due to unknown user. Is my t
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my logs,
that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL, mainly
Spamhaus instead of failing due to unknown user. Is my thinking correct
in that doing unknown user
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:20:02PM +0800, Mingliang Zu wrote:
> > Another thing the OP has missed is what Noel has demonstrated
> > above, that the default smtpd_delay_reject means
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions won't be evaluated until the RCPT TO:
> > command.
>
> Bingo! I added smtpd_delay_re
>
> Another thing the OP has missed is what Noel has demonstrated above,
> that the default smtpd_delay_reject means smtpd_sender_restrictions
> won't be evaluated until the RCPT TO: command.
>
Bingo! I added smtpd_delay_reject=no to force the error reporting right
after MAIL FROM command, which s
Le 12/11/2010 20:03, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:06:46AM -0800, Rob Tanner wrote:
Our admissions office sends out mass mailings to prospective students,
anywhere from 5,000 to 25,000 at a time. They are mail-merged and sent via
outlook to the postfix server, one recipi
16 matches
Mail list logo
