Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

Hi, Nov 7 22:06:27 dell860-403 postfix/smtp[17076]: A35EAC130075: to=< rdcha...@indiatimes.com>, relay=rsmtp.indiatimes.com[223.165.24.11]:25, delay=3.6, delays=0/0/2.6/1, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Message received: 20101108061054.vsft3875.iedge4303-rme.smxemail@seminarsnow.info) On Sun, N

postfix and thousands unix user

hello, currently i am new to postfix and at the moment i have a task to setup mail server with postfix, dovecot and webmin. this system would host hundreds of virtual domains, so thousands of virtual emails was expected. postfix : 2.6.7 dovecot: 2.0.6 centos 5.x webmin since i don't have any exp

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

You mean read RFCs for SMTP, ESMTP, LMTP and diff them :-P On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 10:58:20 -0800, Liam wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > > > - LMTP has one END-OF-DATA status per recipient, instead of

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 10:58:20 -0800, Liam wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > - LMTP has one END-OF-DATA status per recipient, instead of just one > > status for the entire mail transaction. > > > > OK, I need per-recipient status, so LMTP is indeed the right p

Re: 'mailbox_command' (main.cf) not executed

Le 07/11/2010 20:17, Bruno Costacurta a écrit : Hello, I setup Postfix with spamassassin and procmail. spamassassin is configured in master.cf, and procmail in main.cf spamassassin is executed but not procmail. * in master.cf ... smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamfilter:dummy spa

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Liam: > Thanks for your help in sorting this out, Wietse. > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > I can support per-node domains, e.g. node-id.mailhost.xyz > > I suppose some wild-card DNS record will do the trick. > > > > So that all those node domains resolve MX to m

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Thanks for your help in sorting this out, Wietse. On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > I can support per-node domains, e.g. node-id.mailhost.xyz > I suppose some wild-card DNS record will do the trick. > So that all those node domains resolve MX to my proxy? > The non-opti

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Liam: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > It sounds like you will be sending all mail to the same outbound > > proxy, meaning that Postfix has no clue what destinations are up > > and what are down, because that is hidden by your outbound proxy This holds for all delive

Re: 'mailbox_command' (main.cf) not executed

On 11/07/2010 08:17 PM, Bruno Costacurta wrote: Why procmail is not executed ? Is there some priority or dependencies for mailbox_command execution ? Yes: the mail has to be delivered to a mailbox. You are delivering mail to spamassassin. Thanks for any help. Bye, Bruno -- J.

'mailbox_command' (main.cf) not executed

Hello, I setup Postfix with spamassassin and procmail. spamassassin is configured in master.cf, and procmail in main.cf spamassassin is executed but not procmail. * in master.cf ... smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamfilter:dummy spamfilter uni

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > - LMTP has one END-OF-DATA status per recipient, instead of just one > status for the entire mail transaction. > OK, I need per-recipient status, so LMTP is indeed the right protocol. Is it missing any minor features from SMTP that I'm lik

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > It sounds like you will be sending all mail to the same outbound > proxy, meaning that Postfix has no clue what destinations are up > and what are down, because that is hidden by your outbound proxy > I can support per-node domains, e.g. no

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Liam: > Ah, so LMTP can't tell its client to try again later? It seems I'll be > writing an SMTP server... The LMTP protocol supports 4XX replies just like SMTP. The main differences are: - LMTP uses LHLO instead of EHLO/HELO - LMTP has one END-OF-DATA status per recipient, instead of just one s

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Liam: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > There are fundamental problems with on-demand delivery from the MTA > > queue. There is a basic mis-match, because the typical MTA queue > > (not just Postfix but any MTA that I am familiar with) is NOT > > designed to be used as med

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On 11/07/2010 05:55 PM, Liam wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Jeroen Geilman > wrote: Jeroen, thanks for your comments. Websocket is a new protocol to enable persistent, full-duplex, efficient connections to web servers. However, it is just HTTP, rig

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: Jeroen, thanks for your comments. Websocket is a new protocol to enable persistent, full-duplex, efficient > connections to web servers. > > However, it is just HTTP, right ? > Websockets are HTTP-initiated, but messages passed after initia

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > It would be much more efficient to deliver the mail from the MTA > queue to per-webclient intermediate "queues". Those intermediate > queues can be delivered quickly, on-demand, when a websocket client > comes along. Kind-of like using an IM

Re: Rewrite sender based on from:

Le 07/11/2010 12:09, Lennart Johansson a écrit : Hi all, I have a Postfix server doing relaying for a Lotus Domino system, some (domino)users have there own mailbox + a shared mailbox with its own mail address. From time to time users sends mail from the shared mailbox and the mail header

Re: Rewrite sender based on from:

Lennart Johansson: > Hi all, > > I have a Postfix server doing relaying for a Lotus Domino system, > some (domino)users have there own mailbox + a shared mailbox > with its own mail address. From time to time users sends mail > from the shared mailbox and the mail header look like this > > sen

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

On 11/07/2010 04:39 AM, Liam wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jeroen Geilman > wrote: You're again mixing up clients and servers. I'd need more pertinent information to hazard a guess what you're trying to achieve here. Here's a schematic: [postfix]

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Liam: > I'd like to request a little more benefit of the doubt, gentlemen... :-) > > I need to send messages (many from ordinary email sources) on an IP WAN with > unreliable connections to/from nodes whose IPs may vary from session to > session. This is part of a larger application that I can't d

Rewrite sender based on from:

Hi all, I have a Postfix server doing relaying for a Lotus Domino system, some (domino)users have there own mailbox + a shared mailbox with its own mail address. >From time to time users sends mail from the shared mailbox and the mail header >look like this sender: u...@domain.com from: sha

Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

Le 07/11/2010 10:58, Avinash Pawar // Viva a écrit : Nov 7 01:21:47 dell860-403 postfix/smtp[7103]: D49ADC130086: to=mailto:rdcha...@yahoo.co.in>>, relay=mx1.mail.in.yahoo.com [180.222.96.138]:25, delay=1050, delays=1046/0.01/2/2.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok di

Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

* Avinash Pawar // Viva : > Nov 7 01:21:47 dell860-403 postfix/smtp[7103]: D49ADC130086: to=< > rdcha...@yahoo.co.in>, relay=mx1.mail.in.yahoo.com[180.222.96.138]:25, > delay=1050, delays=1046/0.01/2/2.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok dirdel) > > What is *delay *keyword stand for?? Postfix logs

Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

Nov 7 01:21:47 dell860-403 postfix/smtp[7103]: D49ADC130086: to=< rdcha...@yahoo.co.in>, relay=mx1.mail.in.yahoo.com[180.222.96.138]:25, delay=1050, delays=1046/0.01/2/2.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok dirdel) What is *delay *keyword stand for?? On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:12 PM, mouss wrote: >

Re: Outflow spam filtering (?)

In message , Will Fong wrote: >On Nov 6, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> I've gotten myself into a somewhat heated discussion... which seems to >> be the only kind I get into these days... on another mailing list >> regarding the spam outflow filtering capabilities of one part

Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

Hi, Before 4 days my postfix sends 45-50 mails per second. Now my postfix sends only 3-4 mails per second. Can you tell me why it is happened? -- Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact me on the numbers provided below. Thanks & Regards, Avinash Pawar Project Lea

Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

Le 07/11/2010 10:21, Avinash Pawar // Viva a écrit : Hi, I didn't find anything wrong in maillog. But I installed dnsmasq on server some contents of log file : Nov 7 01:13:20 dell860-403 postfix/qmgr[11711]: 0DE7FC130097: from=>, size=7963, nrcpt=1 (queue

Re: Outflow spam filtering (?)

In message , Michael J Wise wrote: >>I believe you can set per user rate limits using policyd. > >Problem is, they don't. >The mailbox is on THEIR system. >And however much we beg, plead or whine, some of our customers don't >share their complete user list with us. Michael, I'm really not sur

Re: Outflow spam filtering (?)

In message <4cd55507.4090...@hardwarefreak.com>, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >... >2. Policyd > - per user rate limiting > - per user send quota I am really quite interested in finding out if there is any pre-canned stuff available to implement the above. Does anyone have an already-dev

Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

Hi, I didn't find anything wrong in maillog. But I installed dnsmasq on server some contents of log file : Nov 7 01:13:20 dell860-403 postfix/qmgr[11711]: 0DE7FC130097: from=< riteshsaraf.sa...@gmail.com>, size=7963, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 7 01:13:20 dell860-403 postfix/smtp[7073]: 007BAC

Re: Outflow spam filtering (?)

Le 07/11/2010 09:27, Ronald F. Guilmette a écrit : In message<4cd55507.4090...@hardwarefreak.com>, Stan Hoeppner wrote: ... 2. Policyd - per user rate limiting - per user send quota I am really quite interested in finding out if there is any pre-canned stuff available to impl

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

Le 07/11/2010 08:32, Liam a écrit : I'd like to request a little more benefit of the doubt, gentlemen... :-) I need to send messages (many from ordinary email sources) on an IP WAN with unreliable connections to/from nodes whose IPs may vary from session to session. This is part of a larger ap

Re: Postfix sends 3-4 mails per second

* Avinash Pawar // Viva : > Before 4 days my postfix sends 45-50 mails per second. > > Now my postfix sends only 3-4 mails per second. > > Can you tell me why it is happened? Your server was an open relay and now that you have fixed the problem spammers went away looking for service...? Serious

Re: Delivery to a websocket gateway

I'd like to request a little more benefit of the doubt, gentlemen... :-) I need to send messages (many from ordinary email sources) on an IP WAN with unreliable connections to/from nodes whose IPs may vary from session to session. This is part of a larger application that I can't discuss publicly.