On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 18:11 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
> different mail folders.
> As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
> of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care
Zitat von Jos Chrispijn :
I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email
to different mail folders.
As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a
load of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't
taken care of that.
Is there a way of usi
On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
> At 10:46 AM 9/19/2010, you wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 10:16:48 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
>>
>> [ .. ]
>>
>>> so you're both saying that a dns query to the system resolver by
>>> unprivileged postscreen gets different results than a query fro
On 09/19/2010 06:11 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
different mail folders.
As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care
of that.
Is the
I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
different mail folders.
As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care of
that.
Is there a way of using rules on my email the moment
At 10:46 AM 9/19/2010, you wrote:
>On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 10:16:48 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
>
>[ .. ]
>
>> so you're both saying that a dns query to the system resolver by
>> unprivileged postscreen gets different results than a query from
>> privileged dig?
>
>That is your straw man and misses the
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 10:16:48 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
[ .. ]
> so you're both saying that a dns query to the system resolver by
> unprivileged postscreen gets different results than a query from
> privileged dig?
That is your straw man and misses the point.
True or false: your command line te
I'm logged into the postscreen machine and su to root to work on
postfix and run dig.
>
>>>Well that is your mistake. You must do the tests as an UNPRIVILEGED
>>>user. Not root, not group wheel, none of that
>
>>It's a basic beginner mistake, but it's not my mistake, nor the
>>problem.:)
>
On 9/19/2010 8:29 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
I'm logged into the postscreen machine and su to root to work on
postfix and run dig.
Well that is your mistake. You must do the tests as an UNPRIVILEGED
user. Not root, not group wheel, none of that
It's a basic beginner mistake, but it's not my mist
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of pf at alt-ctrl-del.org
> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 12:31 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: conditional "recipient address verification" - how to do?
>Len Conrad:
>> >>> Did you use the same resolv.conf on the same host.
>> >>
>> >>Did you do the lookups as an UNPRIVILEGED user.
>> >>
>> >>You are giving zero details, so I have to start at the bottom.
>> >
>> >I'm logged into the postscreen machine and su to root to work on postfix
>> >and run
Len Conrad:
> >> dns_query: 226.224.46.92.zen.rbldnsd.domain.net (A): Host not found
> >>
> >> but
> >>
> >> dig @zen.rbldnsd.domain.net 226.224.46.92.zen.rbldnsd.domain.net +short
> >> 127.0.0.11
> >
> >Did you use the same resolv.conf on the same host.
Obviously you didn't because dig @zen.rb
Len Conrad:
> >>> Did you use the same resolv.conf on the same host.
> >>
> >>Did you do the lookups as an UNPRIVILEGED user.
> >>
> >>You are giving zero details, so I have to start at the bottom.
> >
> >I'm logged into the postscreen machine and su to root to work on postfix and
> >run dig.
We
On 19.09.2010 02:30, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
Eugene V. Boontseff, September 18, 2010 5:10 PM
CheckRelayRecipient = reject_unverified_recipient, permit
If the main destination server is not working, mail is rejected with
the folowing reason:
Recipient address rejected: unverified address:
14 matches
Mail list logo