On 2010-09-04 at 21:35:44 -0700, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
> We use an Ubuntu box along with the likewise-open package to join the Ubuntu
> machine to the domain.
Bad form to reply to my own message--but I forgot to include:
We do spamassassin filtering on the Linux box too which has benefits
for E
On 2010-09-04 at 19:19:34 -0500, Jamrock wrote:
> 1. Mail Entering Postfix machien using Port 25
> 2. Authentication from AD if user exists and mailbox location
> 3 Results from AD
> 4. If user on Mailbox on exchange then deliver to echange
> 5. Else Deliver to postfix
That's almost ex
"Ashwin Muni" wrote in message
news:aanlktimqqpcmm6f89ioamsjtavtmsn3p+gxs0db0i...@mail.gmail.com...
I am using exchange and want to migrate to postfix, The issue is users
should be authenticated from Active Directory and other thing is i have got
1000 users from which 150 users will remain
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/4/2010 7:33 AM:
> What do you mean by "filters"?
Spam filters in the form of table lookups and dnsbl queries. I'm
currently processing
12,581 CIDRs
1,568 regular expressions (PCRE)
5 dnsbl lookups
per each inbound connection (assuming no hits). Obvious
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 04:45:08PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > if (DICT_DB_CLOSE(dict_db->db) < 0)
> > msg_info("close database %s: %m", dict_db->dict.name);
> >
> > Not reporting the anomaly at all may mask real problems in the future.
>
> Hm, so isn't that a bug in BerkeleyD
> As expected. Notice that this message is informational, not a warning
> or an error:
>
> /*
> * With some Berkeley DB implementations, close fails with a bogus ENOENT
> * error, while it reports no errors with put+sync, no errors with
> * del+sync, and no errors with the sync
* Wietse Venema :
> > Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close database
> > /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
>
> Perhaps you notice that this is NOT LOGGED AS A WARNING.
Oh, well - Minor detail :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwe
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
> > Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
>
> I'm still seeing it with postfix-2.8-20100830:
>
> Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close database
>
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
> > Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
>
> I'm still seeing it with postfix-2.8-20100830:
>
> Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close database
> /var
* Wietse Venema :
> That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
> Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
I'm still seeing it with postfix-2.8-20100830:
Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close database
/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
Sep 1 09:49:00 mail postfix/
* fdo...@network-steps.com :
> close database /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
I'm also seeing this, but only very sporadically:
Aug 20 08:49:23 mail-ausfall postfix/postscreen[15615]: close database
/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
Aug 20 16:05:43
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:02:00AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> If we're using delays=a/b/c/d for troubleshooting that's fine. But if
> we're expecting to be tuning a server for performance based on log
> metric data we need time data for our rejected messages as well.
The purpose of the a/b/c/
fdo...@network-steps.com:
> postfix keeps complaining
>
> close database /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
Wietse
On 09/02/2010 03:26 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
If Postfix server gets a mail message with multiple TO: address (i.e.,
multiple recipients), does Postfix send one message to each address?
These decisions are not made when postfix receives mail.
The message in the incoming queue includes al
Hi,
i have recently set up the current postfix version 2.8 from the trunk,
so far everything works fine.
First some feedback to Wietse about postscreen in production
environment:
I have configured postscreen and its doing a great job in production
environment,
combined with grey listing th
Thanks Ram
But all my 1000 users are in AD and only few of them need to have mailboxes
on exchange, how shall i bifurcate 250 users in exchange and rest 750 users
in postfix.
Again the idea of fetching valid users is great from AD will script it.
Ashwin
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Ram wrot
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:11 +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> I am using exchange and want to migrate to postfix, The issue is
> users should be authenticated from Active Directory and other thing is
> i have got 1000 users from which 150 users will remain on exchange and
> the rest mailboxes will be
Considering that spam accounts for the bulk of all client connections to
an MX these days, it might be beneficial if we had log data showing
total time per session, not just for queued mail, so an OP can see how
long it's taking to reject at the smtpd stage, as well as time elapsed
when rejecting m
18 matches
Mail list logo
