Hi!
I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a wrong date,
my mail will go out with a wrong date too.
I know the server will put its own timestamp when it process the
message, but the destination mail client will u
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/22/2010 7:34 PM:
> So if we reverse the scenario and put the "REJECT" first, it's a final
> decision? If so, and if I've described the situation correctly, why do
> we have this opposite behavior between whitelisting and blacklisting?
> If I've not described this corr
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/22/2010 11:13 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> That's not necessarily true. It depends on the order of his
>> smtpd_*_restrictions and whether he's using delayed evaluation. If he's
>> using the multiple section restrictions style with delayed eval it's
>> possible he may have
Hi to all
In the configuration of my main.cf, I have all mail sent to an external
server (relayhost) I can do to check if the server is operational and if
it fails to send all mail to another server
relayhost=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx if fail send to yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
I'm using postfix 2.5
thanks in ad
Noel, pf:
Thanks for your suggestions and comments. I also had the same
questions and its good to see that others used
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname without too many
false-positives.
Now I will enable it on my production server.
Regards,
--
Klaus Engelmann
CCNA CCDA - CSCO10971632
LPI
Erik Logtenberg:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a small milter using Sendmail::Milter in perl. This worked okay
> with postfix 2.6.5, but it doesn't with 2.7.0. I use the i-macro
> (postfix queue-id) in the EOM-callback function. Previously, the i-macro
> was always set at this stage, but now this is no longer
Hi,
I wrote a small milter using Sendmail::Milter in perl. This worked okay
with postfix 2.6.5, but it doesn't with 2.7.0. I use the i-macro
(postfix queue-id) in the EOM-callback function. Previously, the i-macro
was always set at this stage, but now this is no longer the case. I
built the milter
On 8/22/2010 11:42 AM, p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
On Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 16:01 CEST,
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
So I have,
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/heloaccess.cf
If I put the following into heloaccess.cf, for .cc
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:39:48AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Robert Fournerat put forth on 8/19/2010 4:46 PM:
> > Quoting Noel Jones :
> >
> >> Same here. reject_unknown_client_hostname is too strict, but
> >> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname rejects lots of obvious spambots
> >> withou
On Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 16:01 CEST,
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
So I have,
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/heloaccess.cf
If I put the following into heloaccess.cf, for .cc hostnames,
/^.*\.[a-z][a-z]$/ reject_unknown_hel
Stan Hoeppner:
> That's not necessarily true. It depends on the order of his
> smtpd_*_restrictions and whether he's using delayed evaluation. If he's
> using the multiple section restrictions style with delayed eval it's
> possible he may have an "OK" in a later table that causes the mail to be
On Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 17:26 CEST,
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Magnus Bäck put forth on 8/22/2010 10:04 AM:
>
> > A regexp match will cause the reject_unknown_helo_hostname
> > restriction to be evaluated. If it indeed results in a
> > rejection the mail will be rejected no matter what.
>
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Squeeshh Me:
>> Wietse: ok, here it is:
>> egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog | more
>>
>> Aug 22 21:50:17 node2 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit
>> 100 < message size 1498997.
>
> Your Postfix version w
Magnus Bäck put forth on 8/22/2010 10:04 AM:
> On Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 16:01 CEST,
> p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
>
>> So I have,
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
>> check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/heloaccess.cf
>>
>> If I put the following into heloacce
Squeeshh Me:
> Wietse: ok, here it is:
> egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog | more
>
> Aug 22 21:50:17 node2 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit
> 100 < message size 1498997.
Your Postfix version was modified with an unofficial patch
that implements quota in th
On Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 16:01 CEST,
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
> So I have,
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
> check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/heloaccess.cf
>
> If I put the following into heloaccess.cf, for .cc hostnames,
> /^.*\.[a-z][a-z]$/ reject_u
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Squeeshh Me:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for replying. My bad, I realised I posted the log message from
>> /var/log/message. It's quite similar to what I get in postfix log
>> too. Here's the postfix /var/log/mailog version of a test mail that I ju
Squeeshh Me:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for replying. My bad, I realised I posted the log message from
> /var/log/message. It's quite similar to what I get in postfix log
> too. Here's the postfix /var/log/mailog version of a test mail that I just
> sent, hope this is better (also there are no other warnin
Hi,
Thanks for replying. My bad, I realised I posted the log message from
/var/log/message. It's quite similar to what I get in postfix log
too. Here's the postfix /var/log/mailog version of a test mail that I just
sent, hope this is better (also there are no other warning/panic errors
before thi
So I have,
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, check_helo_access
regexp:/etc/postfix/heloaccess.cf
If I put the following into heloaccess.cf, for .cc hostnames,
/^.*\.[a-z][a-z]$/ reject_unknown_helo_hostname
Am I adding to the restrictions? Making it,
smtpd_helo_restricti
Squeeshh Me:
> Aug 21 11:12:55 node1 kernel: pid 40382 (virtual), uid 5000: exited on
> signal 6
For details, look in your MAILLOG file.
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Postfix logs all failed and successful deliveries to a logf
Hi all,
The short version: I want LDAP server authenticity to Postfi without
Postfix authenticity to LDAP.
The long version:
I wanted my Postfix to look up recipients and mail aliases in my LDAP DB.
The ldap_table(5) man page states a parameter 'tls_key' which is confusing.
I thought that the
Hi Folks,
Need your advise on how to solve a problem related to 'unknown mail
transport error'. I've narrowed the error to linked to VDA. VDA works fine
for cases where (incoming mail size) + (existing mailbox file size) is
greater than the quota set for the mailbox.
Example:
Quota set for User
23 matches
Mail list logo
