Aravind Divakaran wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:48:50 -0700, Walter Pinto
> wrote:
>> I'm having a hard time understanding your setup. From what I can
>> gather, you're MX records point to google, incoming mail is then
>> fetched from google to your local server where you have added matching
>>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:48:50 -0700, Walter Pinto
wrote:
> I'm having a hard time understanding your setup. From what I can
> gather, you're MX records point to google, incoming mail is then
> fetched from google to your local server where you have added matching
> users via ldap, but you wish to f
I'm having a hard time understanding your setup. From what I can
gather, you're MX records point to google, incoming mail is then
fetched from google to your local server where you have added matching
users via ldap, but you wish to forward it BACK to google??
HI
I have configured my mailserver with fetchmail and postfix.
Mails will come primarly to Google apps then i will fetch the mails to
my localserver and user will send mail to outside from the localserver
relaying through Google apps. Two virtual domains are configured in the
server and users a
On 8/11/2010 8:44 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
With smtpd_delay_reject = yes
Which of the restriction sections was the following logged
rejection for?
Or put another way, in which of the restriction sections was
the rejection option "reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org" that
resulted in t
> Aug 11 20:15:41 myhost sendmail[17048]: o7B9uJjQ015169:
> to=, ctladdr= (0/0),
> delay=15:19:22, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=1560372,
> relay=mail.example.com., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by
> mail.example.com.
That is the Sendmail MTA, not POSTFIX.
Wietse
Sharma, Ashish:
> Hi,
>
> I have a postfix(postfix 2.6.5) mail receiving server.
>
> On this I have used an email filter (sendmail-jilter
> http://sendmail-jilter.sourceforge.net/) that have some of my custom code.
> Following setting is used for the milter in 'main.cf':
>
> #Milter support fo
With smtpd_delay_reject = yes
Which of the restriction sections was the following logged rejection for?
Or put another way, in which of the restriction sections was the rejection
option "reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org" that resulted in the logged
rejection?
Restriction Options:
smtpd_clie
Hi,
We have a Postfix (2.7.1) instance running successfully for all of our
mail needs, short of one scenario. On our network, we are trying to
configure other hosts (on the same class of private IP address -
192.168.x.x) to forward mail (logwatch files) to an aliased user using a
sendmail c
On 8/11/2010 7:20 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Hello all,
I am having a bit of a problem and I am not sure that it is
specifically Postfix-related, but I'll give it a shot. Feel
free to flog me or tell me to go away.
I am running Postfix 2.3 on a CentOS Linux server.
I noticed on our firewall
> Doesn't Postfix use /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf (which may be
> different)?
>
If he's chroot'ed then I would assume yes.
Christopher Adams wrote (on Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:20:52PM -0700):
> I noticed on our firewall that there were constant connections from the
> machine running Postfix to addresses all over the world. The interesting
> thing is that the connection is using OpenDNS [208.67.216.132], a public DNS
> s
On 08/11/2010 08:20 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Hello all,
I am having a bit of a problem and I am not sure that it is specifically
Postfix-related, but I'll give it a shot. Feel free to flog me or tell
me to go away.
I am running Postfix 2.3 on a CentOS Linux server.
I noticed on our firewa
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am having a bit of a problem and I am not sure that it is specifically
> Postfix-related, but I'll give it a shot. Feel free to flog me or tell me to
> go away.
Ok: go away!
No, just kidding, read on.
>
> I am run
Setup snort and find out where the connections are coming from. There
are many ways to do this.
also check /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/default/resolv.conf
Is your server behind a NAT firewall?
Hello all,
I am having a bit of a problem and I am not sure that it is specifically
Postfix-related, but I'll give it a shot. Feel free to flog me or tell me to
go away.
I am running Postfix 2.3 on a CentOS Linux server.
I noticed on our firewall that there were constant connections from the
mac
On 08/11/2010 09:46 AM, Paul Hutchings wrote:
I have a box running Postfix& MailScanner.
I'd like to be able to say "If a message comes from XYZ and has Word or
PDF attachments and they contain the word ABC,".
I'm sure this can be done, I doubt it's a Postfix feature, but I'm
unsure of the bes
On 8/11/2010 3:43 PM, kazabe wrote:
i need by example reject this email.
From: "MARTHA DIAZ"
To: divin...@hotmail.com, gonzalez...@gmail.com, maia...@hotmail.com,
angelamaritz...@hotmail.com, bibiss...@hotmail.com,
juancaco...@hotmail.com, zhi...@hotmail.com, lcp...@hotmail.com,
carolina_ne
2010/8/11 Magnus Bäck :
>
> The body (or, as I suspect you really meant, the headers) is irrelevant,
> it's the envelope you should inspect. A policy server can record the
> number of recipients in a message and reject the message if a particular
> condition is met. Check out existing policy server
Hi,
I have a postfix(postfix 2.6.5) mail receiving server.
On this I have used an email filter (sendmail-jilter
http://sendmail-jilter.sourceforge.net/) that have some of my custom code.
Following setting is used for the milter in 'main.cf':
#Milter support for smtpd mail
smtpd_milters =
ine
I have a box running Postfix & MailScanner.
I'd like to be able to say "If a message comes from XYZ and has Word or
PDF attachments and they contain the word ABC, ".
I'm sure this can be done, I doubt it's a Postfix feature, but I'm
unsure of the best (and easiest for someone like myself) product
On 8/11/2010 6:54 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Jones put forth on 8/11/2010 6:20 AM:
This is logged when the client disconnected in the middle of the
transaction -- postfix lost the connection -- NOT a reject.
You won't find reject log entries for the lost connections after EHLO or
CONNECT, a
Noel Jones put forth on 8/11/2010 6:20 AM:
> This is logged when the client disconnected in the middle of the
> transaction -- postfix lost the connection -- NOT a reject.
>
> You won't find reject log entries for the lost connections after EHLO or
> CONNECT, although the ones for RCPT and DATA *
On 8/11/2010 4:10 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/11/2010 3:31 AM:
I was just looking at a Logwatch summary. The data the OP is requesting _is_
in the Postfix logs somewhere, as Logwatch is tallying the disconnection phases:
81 Connections lost (inbound)
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/11/2010 3:31 AM:
> I was just looking at a Logwatch summary. The data the OP is requesting _is_
> in the Postfix logs somewhere, as Logwatch is tallying the disconnection
> phases:
>
>81 Connections lost (inbound)
>61 After DATA
>11
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 8/11/2010 2:35 AM:
> * Stan Hoeppner :
>> Michael Orlitzky put forth on 8/10/2010 4:02 PM:
>>
>>> I think he just wants to know which smtpd restrictions list contains the
>>> rule that caused the rejection.
>>
>> This is relatively easy to accomplish with custom reject
* Stan Hoeppner :
> Michael Orlitzky put forth on 8/10/2010 4:02 PM:
>
> > I think he just wants to know which smtpd restrictions list contains the
> > rule that caused the rejection.
>
> This is relatively easy to accomplish with custom rejection messages. Simply
> insert a unique symbol at the
Michael Orlitzky put forth on 8/10/2010 4:02 PM:
> I think he just wants to know which smtpd restrictions list contains the
> rule that caused the rejection.
This is relatively easy to accomplish with custom rejection messages. Simply
insert a unique symbol at the beginning of each rejection mes
* damian lee :
> Thank you for your answer Sahil.
>
> In fact I don't fully understand the problem.
> Do you mean I have to have a "*static* libdb library" inorder to compile my
> Postfix in static linking?
Of course. Otherwise this lib would have non-static dependencies.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
* junkyardma...@verizon.net :
> "I think he just wants to know which smtpd restrictions list contains
> the rule that caused the rejection."
>
> Correct.
Like I said, even with smtpd_delay_reject = no this is not given.
> >An almost-answer: each reject_foo rule has a certain log format
> >which,
30 matches
Mail list logo
