On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:16:08 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> On 2010-07-23 02:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > It appears that google's SMTP client does not use the SIZE declaration
> > as outlined in RFC 1870. You can record the conversation between google
> > and your server to verify this you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/07/10 03:55, Jesus Cea wrote:
> If you are actually saying that the issue is with thunderbird email
> client, my next step would be to do a python email sender sending the
> very same mail.
Trying to create a "portable" reproductable case, I hav
On 7/23/2010 4:11 PM, Denis BUCHER wrote:
Hello Brian,
Le 23.07.2010 16:49, Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
Yesterday I succeeded into blocking some IP (or more
exactly allowing
only some) to connect to one of my server and send email
via SMTP.
Now for another server, I need something a l
On 7/23/2010 6:42 PM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/24/2010 12:44 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
Hi guys, I have the following question:
Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
through my Postfix?
What does "
On 7/23/2010 12:59 PM, Walter Pinto wrote:
Couldn't you restrict the large bounces by setting bounce_size_limit = x ?
This limits the amount of data returned with the bounce; it
doesn't eliminate the bounce.
smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_multi_recipient_bounce is a good idea too
This r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/07/10 01:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
> 2) I repeat, the problem is that Postfix does not recognize the
> end of the message.
I don't send the message completely. According to thunderbird, it sends
88% only, waiting for postfix to open the tcp windo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/10 20:45, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix logs a milter-reject record with whatever text the milter
> gives to Postfix.
Yes, my fault. I overlooked it. Sorry.
> Jul 23 20:11:57 XX sendmail[9441]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
>> o6NIBtWs009441:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>> With a check_sender_access restriction in smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
>>>
>>
>> Ok. Should it be something like this in /etc/postfix/access
>>
>> someu...@domain.com REJECT
>>
>> And then:
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sende
On 07/24/2010 01:42 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/24/2010 12:44 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
Hi guys, I have the following question:
Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
through my Postfix?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 07/24/2010 12:44 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys, I have the following question:
>>
>> Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
>> through my Postfix?
>>
>
> What does "through" mean ?
> If you mean F
On 07/24/2010 12:44 AM, Andrés Gattinoni wrote:
Hi guys, I have the following question:
Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
through my Postfix?
What does "through" mean ?
If you mean FROM an address that is in your virtual_*_maps, then no, not
trivially.
Jesus Cea:
> On 23/07/10 23:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This has nothing to do with milters.
> >
> > A diff between the logs shows that YOU disconnect from the submission
> > port before POSTFIX has logged the final MIME boundary.
> >
> > I suspect that you have an SMTP client implementation pro
Hi guys, I have the following question:
Is it possible to restrict some virtual accounts from sending emails
through my Postfix?
I have Postfix 2.3.3 running on a box with several virtual accounts. I
want to prevent some of them from sending emails (I just want them to
be able to receive).
How co
On 07/23/2010 08:42 AM, Joe Wong wrote:
Hello,
For some good reason, I want to have a way to bounce all message in
deferred queue. Is there a command(s) to do so?
That is a very bad idea.
The only valid reason to do this would be if you /knew/ these messages
can never be delivered, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/10 23:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This has nothing to do with milters.
>
> A diff between the logs shows that YOU disconnect from the submission
> port before POSTFIX has logged the final MIME boundary.
>
> I suspect that you have an SMTP cli
Hello Brian,
Le 23.07.2010 16:49, Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
Yesterday I succeeded into blocking some IP (or more exactly allowing
only some) to connect to one of my server and send email via SMTP.
Now for another server, I need something a little more complicated and
I would be happy
Jesus Cea:
> On 23/07/10 20:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> How can I help you to diagnose & solve the error?.
> >
> > With POSTFIX "smtpd -v" and "cleanup -v" logging for:
> >
> > - One message that demonstrates the problem
> >
> > - The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter changed in the recipie
On 7/23/2010 4:49 PM, Theodore Durst wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I am probably misunderstanding this, have been playing ith the TLS
> configuration but seemed to be spinning my wheels. What we need to do is
> encrypt communication between this postfix server (which will only send)
> and a relay server on a
Matt,
I am probably misunderstanding this, have been playing ith the TLS
configuration but seemed to be spinning my wheels. What we need to do is
encrypt communication between this postfix server (which will only send)
and a relay server on another box.
Please elaborate.
Theodore
Please elabora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/10 20:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>> How can I help you to diagnose & solve the error?.
>
> With POSTFIX "smtpd -v" and "cleanup -v" logging for:
>
> - One message that demonstrates the problem
>
> - The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter chan
Jesus Cea put forth on 7/23/2010 2:33 PM:
> The email filesize is around 300Kbytes. The mailing list rejects it.
>
> Should I send it to your personal email?. Send a ZIP file?
Put it on your httpd server, or upload it to pastebin.com, and publish the
appropriate link.
--
Stan
On 7/23/2010 3:51 PM, Theodore Durst wrote:
> I have been trying to get postfix running with TLS under AIX 5.2.3 with
> no luck. Retracing my steps, I ran postconf and get no response when
> running it with -A or -a fags.
>
> There are no man pages installed on this box and I am an AIX newbie
> (c
I have been trying to get postfix running with TLS under AIX 5.2.3 with
no luck. Retracing my steps, I ran postconf and get no response when
running it with -A or -a fags.
There are no man pages installed on this box and I am an AIX newbie
(coming to this from BSD and GNU/linux). So, I am, not sur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The email filesize is around 300Kbytes. The mailing list rejects it.
Should I send it to your personal email?. Send a ZIP file?
- --
Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/
Jesus Cea:
> On 23/07/10 20:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > - The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter changed in the recipient
> > address, so that it does not demonstrate the problem.
>
> Only one letter?. Then would be a non existant account. Is this test
> useful to you?. I could create a valid e
Jesus Cea:
> For instance, in sendmail I see things like this in the logs:
>
> Jul 23 20:10:09 XXX sendmail[9338]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
> o6NIA6ef009338: Milter: to=, reject=451 Temporaly delayed.
> Try later (3540)
...
> Jul 23 20:10:56 XXX sendmail[9374]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
> o6NIArA7009374:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/07/10 20:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> - The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter changed in the recipient
> address, so that it does not demonstrate the problem.
Only one letter?. Then would be a non existant account. Is this test
useful to you?.
>
> How can I help you to diagnose & solve the error?.
With POSTFIX "smtpd -v" and "cleanup -v" logging for:
- One message that demonstrates the problem.
- The EXACT SAME MESSAGE with one letter changed in the recipient
address, so that it does not demonstrate the problem.
Do not send verbos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, my friends.
My milter inserts/replace headers. Is there any postfix configuration to
dump the headers changed by milter in the log, like sendmail does?. Now
I have to cross reference postfix logs with milter logs to create an
unified vision. :-?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have spend the last months trying to debug an sporadic milter hang.
Finally, a few days ago I found a (brittle) reproductible case.
After a couple of days I determined that the problem was in postfix, not
my milter filter. I was running postfix 2.6.
Couldn't you restrict the large bounces by setting bounce_size_limit = x ?
smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_multi_recipient_bounce is a good idea too
On 7/23/2010 10:31 AM, Denis BUCHER wrote:
Dear all,
Yesterday I succeeded into blocking some IP (or more exactly allowing
only some) to connect to one of my server and send email via SMTP.
Now for another server, I need something a little more complicated and
I would be happy if someone co
Dear all,
Yesterday I succeeded into blocking some IP (or more exactly allowing
only some) to connect to one of my server and send email via SMTP.
Now for another server, I need something a little more complicated and I
would be happy if someone could direct me to the right method.
I would
On 23/07/2010 13:37, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
What I need to do is configure A so that mail destined for B is stored
indefinitely (well, for a few days, at least) without generating NDRs or
attempted delivery notifications, so that when B comes back online all
the stored mail can be de
Mark Goodge:
> OK, I'm sure this is in the documentation somewhere, but my brain isn't
> working this morning and I need to get a fix for this fairly quickly, so
> I'm asking here instead :-)
>
> Anyway, I currently have a situation where mail is currently received by
> machine A, which then fo
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:24:52PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * Victor Duchovni :
> >
> > > Note, if rsync propagates file permissions before it copies file contents,
> > > an incomplete queue file could be picked up by the queue manager before
> > > it is completely
Vasya Pupkin wrote:
> I'm my own only customer. And I understand risks of disabling bounce
> feature. I understand that someone will not get a notification if his
> email will not be delivered to me, but I can live with it.
It is still solving the wrong problem, and possibly (probably?) someday
yo
On 2010-07-22 10:45 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> I am dealing with the same thing. I have to forward to non-local
> mail servers and I try to mimic some of those settings but we still
> get a few that pass local mail to external mail which is then
> rejected.
To state the obvious - have you tried
On Fri, Jul 23, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I haven't checked if it's a flaw in my configuration, but anyways,
> for the records:
>
> openSUSE 11.3 does not seem to automatically set up the TLS certs
> for the chroot if you have smtp_tls_CApath set, but not
> smtpd_tls_CApath (note t
On 2010-07-23 02:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 13:08:32 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
>
>> Jul 21 12:11:26 smtpd[31280]: connect from
>> mail-ww0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
>> Jul 21 12:11:26 smtpd[31280]: 2E..36:
>> client=mail-ww0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
>> Jul 21
OK, I'm sure this is in the documentation somewhere, but my brain isn't
working this morning and I need to get a fix for this fairly quickly, so
I'm asking here instead :-)
Anyway, I currently have a situation where mail is currently received by
machine A, which then forwards it to machine B.
41 matches
Mail list logo
