Mihira Fernando put forth on 6/28/2010 3:28 AM:
> Also its not CNAME that you use. Its the A record.
My mistake. You can actually point the MX for another domain at the dyndns
fqdn. I got my thought process screwed up due to all the goofiness of how
DynDNS does some things, and the specific sce
Noel Jones put forth on 6/28/2010 6:56 AM:
> Don't confuse mail routing (mail directed from the internet to your
> server via DNS records) with mail hosting (mail accepted somewhere and
> forwarded/proxied to your server). Dyndns provides mail routing for
> free; their mail hosting service is a p
Rachid Abdelkhalak a écrit :
>
> Hello List,
>
> I have a mail relay and an internal mail server both under Postfix and
> behind a firewall (DMZ and LAN), on both segment i'm using a private IP
> address with NAT.
>
> On all outgoing emails headers sent by our users, i can see my servers
> ip ad
Basanta shrestha a écrit :
> Dear All,
>
> CentOS 5.2
>
> Followed http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix and installed
> postfix dovecot system-switch-mail system-switch-mail-gnome
>
please note that centos docs are under centos responsibility. here, the
docs are on www.postfix.org. anything el
ms...@ciu.edu.tr a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a mail server with the postfix/Squirrelmail/Dovecot combination
> which I have user data on MySQL as virtual users. I have configured SM so
> that users can now change their own password.
>
> Is there any opensource solution to provide "self service pas
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Florin Andrei
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 June 2010 6:00 a.m.
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: dealing with Yahoo slowness
>
> On 06/10/2010 05:09 PM, Mike Hutchinson
No problem at all. If you need more help, let me know, as this is the
kind of stuff that I deal with here (convincing bosses..).
Btw, unless you get your users to use webmail, their local internal IP
address of their client machines will always be in the email headers -
even if the server is i
Thank you Jonathan.
--
|-Rachid Abdelkhalak
|-Network Security Engineer, MTDS
|-in morocco 080200MTDS
|-direct +212(0)537278820
|-mobile +212(0)661173437
|-14, rue 16 novembre
|-Rabat 10080 Kingdom of Morocco
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Hi Rachid,
Ahh the good old "end user
Hi Rachid,
Ahh the good old "end user's boss" problem!
Well I guess the arguments could be that since it's an internal IP
address, there is *no way* it can be accessed from outside. Even if the
boss's firewall left all ports open to the mail server, they couldn't
access it via the internal IP
Me too Matt, but i have to give him a solution or an answer as i'm the
person who maintain their mail plateforme.
Thank you
--
|-Rachid Abdelkhalak
|-Network Security Engineer, MTDS
|-in morocco 080200MTDS
|-direct +212(0)537278820
|-mobile +212(0)661173437
|-14, rue 16 novembre
|-Rabat 10080
On 6/28/2010 1:07 PM, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote:
>
> This is not a problem for me, the end customer's IT boss asked me to see
> if it is possible to do it, he dont like to publish theire private IPs
> for 'Security reasons'.
>
> If it is not possible, i have to give him convincing arguments.
>
>
This is not a problem for me, the end customer's IT boss asked me to see
if it is possible to do it, he dont like to publish theire private IPs for
'Security reasons'.
If it is not possible, i have to give him convincing arguments.
Thank you
--
|-Rachid Abdelkhalak
|-Network Security Engine
Richid,
Why is it a problem that people see your internal IPs?
Thanks
On 28/06/10 18:03, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote:
Thank you Jeroen,
My need is to prvent peopel seeing my internal IPs, if i can make my
server write on the header 127.0.0.1 instead instead of the
192.168.0.2 is will be great
Thank you Jeroen,
My need is to prvent peopel seeing my internal IPs, if i can make my
server write on the header 127.0.0.1 instead instead of the 192.168.0.2 is
will be great.
I see on the header of your mail for example, all Received: tags indicate
127.0.0.1, i want my server to do the sa
Avinash Pawar // Viva:
> Hi,
>
> I want to give priority to each outbound email and as per priority email
> will be sent.
There is no priority support in Postfix. Postfix uses a shared
queue by design.
Instead of making Postfix more complex, you could use different
Postfix instances. Using a un
On 6/28/2010 12:22 AM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
Hi,
I want to give priority to each outbound email and as per priority email
will be sent.
For example, if there are three email with priority *high*, *medium* and
*low* respectively.
In this case, the high priority email should be sent first
On 6/28/2010 1:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Basanta shrestha put forth on 6/27/2010 11:26 PM:
Dear Stan,
I doubt it is absolutely necessary to pay for that service.
Please refer
Yes, it is necessary. You can't host a mail server without paying someone
some amount of money. If you actually _re
Now that I know it works can you tell me where I went wrong ? I do not
need to do anything in "Mail Routing" Section Right ?
-Basanta
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 01:16 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> Mihira Fernando put forth on 6/28/2010 2:20 AM:
>>
>>
On 06/28/2010 01:16 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mihira Fernando put forth on 6/28/2010 2:20 AM:
you can use the dyndns.org free account for email by using the dyndns
FQDN allocated for the server in your domain's MX entry.
May not be the perfect way but it works.
What domain MX entry?
Mihira Fernando put forth on 6/28/2010 2:20 AM:
> you can use the dyndns.org free account for email by using the dyndns
> FQDN allocated for the server in your domain's MX entry.
>
> May not be the perfect way but it works.
What domain MX entry?
Why would someone pay for DNS hosting for a sing
- Original Message
> From: Daniel V. Reinhardt
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 3:32:04 AM
> Subject: Re: performance tuning - relay
>
>
- Original Message
> From: Stan Hoeppner <
> ymailto="mailto:s...@hardwarefreak.com";
> href="mailto:s...@ha
- Original Message
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 2:44:54 AM
> Subject: Re: dyndns adsl port forward
>
> Basanta shrestha put forth on 6/27/2010 11:26 PM:
> Dear Stan,
> I
> doubt it is absolutely necessary to pay for that service.
> Pl
- Original Message
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 2:23:15 AM
> Subject: Re: performance tuning - relay
>
> Christian Purnomo put forth on 6/27/2010 5:50 PM:
> From your
> questions above, I could see where you're coming from that if
>
On 06/28/2010 12:14 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Basanta shrestha put forth on 6/27/2010 11:26 PM:
Dear Stan,
I doubt it is absolutely necessary to pay for that service.
Please refer
Yes, it is necessary. You can't host a mail server without paying someone
some amount of money. If you a
24 matches
Mail list logo
