Покотиленко Костик put forth on 6/11/2010 2:24 PM:
> This client name unmungled:
>
> smtp.harddriveme.com [111.67.206.181]
This should have been caught by one of the two SORBS lists you said you added
per my advice. SORBS has been listing the parent /20 since Nov 2009.
Netblock: 111.67.1
On 6/12/2010 7:48 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Denis BUCHER wrote:
a) I have a very strange problem with postfix, it worked for more
than one year without problem, and now, for about one month some
incoming emails started to fail in the night (approx. between 4AM
and 5AM) bu
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Denis BUCHER wrote:
> a) I have a very strange problem with postfix, it worked for more
> than one year without problem, and now, for about one month some
> incoming emails started to fail in the night (approx. between 4AM
> and 5AM) but not every day, with errors like :
>
>
On 6/12/2010 16:03, Denis BUCHER wrote:
>
> c) More info :
> That's what I see in the logs approximately at the same time these
> errors are seen :
>
> Jun 11 04:45:21 cirrus postfix/trivial-rewrite[3636]: warning:
> dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://localhost:389 as
> cn=, o
Dear all,
a) I have a very strange problem with postfix, it worked for more than
one year without problem, and now, for about one month some incoming
emails started to fail in the night (approx. between 4AM and 5AM) but
not every day, with errors like :
* Out: 451 4.3.0 : Temporary lookup fa
On 6/12/2010 4:04 PM, Walter Pinto wrote:
Clarification,
Troubleshooting what seems to be mail being sent FROM our own domains
_without authentication_ TO anywhere.
Apparently we're having a hard time understanding exactly what
you are asking for. Showing your "postconf -n" and logging of
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Walter Pinto wrote:
> Troubleshooting what seems to be mail being sent FROM our own domains
> *without authentication* TO anywhere.
One option:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_login_maps
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatc
Thomas,
That makes sense thanks. What you described is the goal I'm trying to
achieve.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Polliard wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Thomas Polliard wrote:
>
>
> I'm pretty sure I already know the answer , just need confirmation.
>
> Is this stateme
Clarification,
Troubleshooting what seems to be mail being sent FROM our own domains *without
authentication* TO anywhere.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Walter Pinto wrote:
> There's no need to be rude sir. I'm just trying to become more familiar
> with the Postfix system as an alternative t
There's no need to be rude sir. I'm just trying to become more familiar with
the Postfix system as an alternative to Qmail which I've had more real world
experience dealing with,
You have my problem reversed. I'm troubleshooting what seems to be mail
being sent FROM our own domains TO anywhere
On 06/12/2010 07:06 AM, Walter Pinto wrote:
Recipient map is also SQL based, here's the config.
[r...@mx sql]# cat relay_recipient_map.conf
user = xxx
password = xxx
dbname = xxx
query =
SELECT y
FROM relay_recipient_map
WHERE x='%s'
I'm pretty sure I already
Am 11.06.2010 19:31, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
> On 06/11/2010 04:40 PM, motty.cruz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeroen Geilman
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:02 PM
>> *To:* postfix-users@postfix.
On Jun 12, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Thomas Polliard wrote:
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I already know the answer , just need confirmation.
>>
>> Is this statement true or false? You cannot restrict sending mail to
>> authenticated sessions without also restricting incoming mail as well.
>>
>>
>
> False
>
> I'm pretty sure I already know the answer , just need confirmation.
>
> Is this statement true or false? You cannot restrict sending mail to
> authenticated sessions without also restricting incoming mail as well.
>
>
False
14 matches
Mail list logo
