On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:54:34AM +0100, Jo?o Gouveia wrote:
> I'm having a weird behavior with my (very simple) postfix configuration.
> I was trying to use LDAP to check if I should relay for a domain or not,
> like this:
>
> relay_domains = proxy:ldap:/etc/postfix/relay_domains_ldap.cf
The "
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Gary Smith [gary.sm...@holdstead.com]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 11:22 PM
To: fakessh; Postfix users
Subject: RE: are you there a official version of centos postfix most days can
be redhat
>
> do you hav
Matthieu Finiasz:
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/relay_reg
>
> Then relay_reg contains:
> /@domain1\.net$/ domain1:
> /@domain2\.net$/ domain2:
Postfix expects the lookup result syntax of the relayhost parameter.
As documented for the relayhost parameter, SMTP destination
On 22/05/10 18:50, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 06:37:57PM +0100, Jonathan Cutting wrote:
Hi All,
I've had a look at the manual for bounced mail, and although I can see that
it is possible to customise the mailer-daemon message for bounced email, I
can't see an option to
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 06:37:57PM +0100, Jonathan Cutting wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've had a look at the manual for bounced mail, and although I can see that
> it is possible to customise the mailer-daemon message for bounced email, I
> can't see an option to include the bounced mail inline rather
Hi All,
I've had a look at the manual for bounced mail, and although I can see
that it is possible to customise the mailer-daemon message for bounced
email, I can't see an option to include the bounced mail inline rather
than as an attachment.
We use SugarCRM to send campaigns and it checks
Hello everyone, I have been running postfix for two mail domains (say,
domain1.net and domain2.net) for a while and everything works fine.
However, in my main.cf configuration file I have set myhostname =
mail.domain1.net and thus, every mail received from my postfix SMTP
contains a header line
Tomoyuki Murakami:
> > First, this would accept mail for forwarder+anyuser=anydom...@my.dom,
> > meaning that it would be an open relay. A more secure implementation
> > would compute a hash of (orig_sen...@domain.com, local secret) and
> > include that hash in the return address.
>
> I guess, wit
