On 4/19/2010 8:03 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
question on my setup. my primary MX server sits inside my network, with a NATed
IP. my postfix config references only the inside network.
should i move this MX server outside and use it's public address in the config
? inbound mail gets checked an
On 4/19/2010 8:22 PM, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:51 -0400
Von: donovan jeffrey j
An: Ralf Hildebrandt
CC: Postfix users
Betreff: Re: DNS RBL error
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Rather test with:
2.0.0.127.zen.spam
On 4/19/2010 6:07 PM, David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am having some issues with my server blocking ISP IP addresses.
I know a recent update to plesk-9.5.1 changed my postfix main.cf and
master.cf (the timestamps changed). I managed to fix main.cf as on
the
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Steve wrote:
> You can run that caching DNS where ever you want as long as you secure that
> DNS. If you use BIND and are using forwarders to your ISP name servers then
> that caching will not necessarily help much if your ISP's NS are the problem.
>
thanks for the
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:51 -0400
> Von: donovan jeffrey j
> An: Ralf Hildebrandt
> CC: Postfix users
> Betreff: Re: DNS RBL error
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >
> > Rather test with:
> > 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
> >
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> Rather test with:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>
> which should return:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
yes this is
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, David Cottle wrote:
> I know a recent update to plesk-9.5.1 changed my postfix main.cf and
> master.cf (the timestamps changed). I managed to fix main.cf as on
> the smtpd_client_restrictions, they put the RBLs first.
>
> Can anyone see what is wrong in the master.cf?
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am having some issues with my server blocking ISP IP addresses.
I know a recent update to plesk-9.5.1 changed my postfix main.cf and
master.cf (the timestamps changed). I managed to fix main.cf as on
the smtpd_client_restrictions, they put the RBLs
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 4/19/2010 8:29 AM:
> * John Peach :
>
>> Your nslookup shows you using 207.172.3.20 as a nameserver:
>>
>> 20.3.172.207.in-addr.arpa name = auth1.dns.rcn.net
>>
>> Your ISP's nameserver. You need to run your own, so that you query
>> spamhaus directly. They are
Alex a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>>> I'm trying to do:
>>>
>>> warn_if_reject = reject_rbl_client backscatter.spameatingmonkey.net
>>>
>> wrong syntax. it's
>>warn_if_reject reject_rbl_client $yourlist
>> There's no 'equal' sign.
>
> $ postfix check
> postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:28:47PM +0200, Gregory BELLIER wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> I would like to set up authentication between 2 postfix hosted on Debian
> Lenny and until now it doesn't work.
>
> Here is a log sample :
> warning: SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found
> SASL authentic
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 01:09:28PM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> i don't think I did anything other than stop lookups for a bit.
> thanks for your assistance.
Give thanks to the LORD[1], perhaps. He works in mysterious ways,
or so I hear. :)
[1] LinfORD
PS: Seriously. I doubt this is solved
On 4/19/2010 12:34 PM, Aaron Clausen wrote:
This has probably been asked a hundred times before, but a client of
mine has requested the ability to reject emails if their spam score is
above a certain score, rather than marking it as spam. Is this a
possibility with Postfix?
Yes, but the filte
On 04/19/2010 11:34 AM, Aaron Clausen wrote:
> This has probably been asked a hundred times before, but a client of
> mine has requested the ability to reject emails if their spam score is
The problem is that this has to happen after the DATA phase, which is well
after the RCPT phase. If there ar
This has probably been asked a hundred times before, but a client of
mine has requested the ability to reject emails if their spam score is
above a certain score, rather than marking it as spam. Is this a
possibility with Postfix?
--
Aaron Clausen
mightymartia...@gmail.com
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>> by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
>>
>> dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>> Server: 209.96.96.2
>> Address:209.96.96.2#53
>
> You should do such tests as a non
donovan jeffrey j:
> by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
>
> dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
> Server: 209.96.96.2
> Address:209.96.96.2#53
You should do such tests as a non-root user. Postfix does not query
the DNS as root.
Wie
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
>> Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from unknown[117.201.68.108]: 554 Service
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
> Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from unknown[117.201.68.108]: 554 Service unavailable; Client host
> [117.201.68.108] blocked u
On 4/19/2010 9:34 AM, CT wrote:
My relay sends as follows:
90% - relayhost
10% - other hosts in transport (these go "directly" out)
This works well.
my question:
When the primary relayhost is "unavailable" what would be
the best way to *send* the 90% out.. ?
(not about load balancing)
If yo
Hi all !
I would like to set up authentication between 2 postfix hosted on Debian
Lenny and until now it doesn't work.
Here is a log sample :
warning: SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found
SASL authentication failed; cannot authenticate to server
10.0.0.6[10.0.0.6]: no mechanism
Gaby L:
> Hi
> I scan with my postfix server with NMap from other location.
> The NMAP creats report smtp port open (It is OK) but apear Postfix smtpd and
> other information about MTA program.
> I dont want to apear any information about my MTA server.
To disclose no information, close the SMTP
Hi
I scan with my postfix server with NMap from other location.
The NMAP creats report smtp port open (It is OK) but apear Postfix smtpd and
other information about MTA program.
I dont want to apear any information about my MTA server.
Thanks
Gaby
On 19 Apr 2010, at 14:53, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>> Greetings
>>>
>>> i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
>>> resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:38:46PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/18/2010 9:56 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> reject_unauth_pipelining,
>>
>> Might catch some zombies.
>
> Note that with older postfix (postfix < 2.6 IIRC)
> reject_unauth_pipelining must be used in smtpd_data_restrictions
>
On 18/04/10 17:27, Ignacio García wrote:
> John, thanks so much for your interest. I just downloaded it. Tomorrow
> I will be meeting my partner (he's the php guy) adn we will take a
> look at it. I'll certainly keep you posted of any developments.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ignacio
I have made an updat
My relay sends as follows:
90% - relayhost
10% - other hosts in transport (these go "directly" out)
This works well.
my question:
When the primary relayhost is "unavailable" what would be
the best way to *send* the 90% out.. ?
(not about load balancing)
Thx
Charles
* donovan jeffrey j :
> ins2:~ root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search beth.k12.pa.us
> nameserver 10.135.1.2
> nameserver 209.96.96.2
> nameserver 207.172.3.20
>
> ins2:~ root# nslookup zen.spamhaus.org
> Server: 207.172.3.20
> Address:207.172.3.20#53
>
> ** server can't find zen.sp
* John Peach :
> Your nslookup shows you using 207.172.3.20 as a nameserver:
>
> 20.3.172.207.in-addr.arpa name = auth1.dns.rcn.net
>
> Your ISP's nameserver. You need to run your own, so that you query
> spamhaus directly. They are counting all the hits from RCN.
apt-get install pdns-rec
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * donovan jeffrey j :
>>>
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
>>>
>>> This should well be within the limit
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:09:38 -0400
donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * donovan jeffrey j :
> >
> >> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about
> >> 2000 users.
> >
> > This should well be within the limits. We're execee
* donovan jeffrey j :
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * donovan jeffrey j :
> >
> >> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
> >
> > This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
> > about 30k users. Maybe
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>
>> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
>
> This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
> about 30k users. Maybe you're using your ISPs DNS forwarder?
I
mohamad rahimi:
>In our group we are using suse and Postfix SMTP server. Every thing
>was fine until last month when we restart our mail server and also
>firewall. The first problem is that when we use Thunderbird with
>security and Authentication it is impossible to send a email. we
>receive this
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:58 AM, John Peach wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
> donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * donovan jeffrey j :
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems
>
* donovan jeffrey j :
> this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
about 30k users. Maybe you're using your ISPs DNS forwarder?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
C
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>
>> I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
>
> Well, how big is your server?
oh it's about this high " - - - "
j/k
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 use
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * donovan jeffrey j :
> >> Greetings
> >>
> >> i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems
> >> it's not resolving. at least for me. is anyone else ha
* donovan jeffrey j :
> I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
Well, how big is your server?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel.
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * donovan jeffrey j :
>> Greetings
>>
>> i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
>> resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
>
> You might have been blocked because you exceeded the
* donovan jeffrey j :
> Greetings
>
> i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
> resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
You might have been blocked because you exceeded the limits for free
usage.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
Apr 19 08:21:48 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21485]: warning:
130.60.141.41.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not
found. Name servic
On 4/19/2010 12:11 AM, Alex wrote:
The "warn_if_reject" feature predates "reject_unauth_pipelining", which you
seem to be using successfully. I strongly suspect there was some other
error -- probably a simple typo in your config -- that kept warn_if_reject
from working for you.
I'm trying to
Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/18/2010 4:40 PM, groups wrote:
Noel Jones wrote, On 04/18/2010 04:20 PM:
On 4/18/2010 4:16 PM, groups wrote:
Postfix logs help you know what happened to a particular message.
Look
in your logs for bounces (sender=<>) arriving from your relayhost,
and
see what postfix
From: Simon Waters
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 11:19:04 AM
Subject: Re: Mail server responded 5.7.1
On Monday 19 April 2010 09:51:52 mohamad rahimi wrote:
> In our group we are using suse and
> Postfix SMTP server. Every thing was
On Monday 19 April 2010 09:51:52 mohamad rahimi wrote:
> In our group we are using suse and
> Postfix SMTP server. Every thing was fine until last month when we
> restart our mail server and also firewall.
> The first problem is that when we use
> Thunderbird with security and Authentication it is
In our group we are using suse and
Postfix SMTP server. Every thing was fine until last month when we
restart our mail server and also firewall.
The first problem is that when we use
Thunderbird with security and Authentication it is impossible to send
a email. we receive this error “Unable to
Alex put forth on 4/19/2010 12:11 AM:
> It looks like I have a big project ahead of me to upgrade. What kind
> of process is involved with going from such an old version to the
> current, independent of all the other software?
Not much. Just create/modify the new main.cf and any other config fil
48 matches
Mail list logo
