>It's not documented, because there is no promise that it will work
>the same way in a future Postfix version.
>
>However, the names of the records give a hint.
>
>> Most particularly, I'm concerned about the following three fields:
>>
>> named_attribute: dsn_orig_rcpt=rfc822;em...@example.com
>> o
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 5:04 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: postcat ENVELOPE RECORDS output?
>
> Curtis:
> > Oops... that was embarrassing... my
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 07:16:58PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
>
>> I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
>> so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission
>> server.
>
> Th
Curtis:
> Oops... that was embarrassing... my message was missing a subject. (fixed)
>
> I apologize if this is answered in the documention. but I'm having trouble
> finding where the "ENVELOPE RECORDS" section of the postcat output is
> described.
It's not documented, because there is no promis
Oops... that was embarrassing... my message was missing a subject. (fixed)
-Original Message-
From: Curtis [mailto:postfixu...@isparks.com]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:05 PM
To: 'postfix-users@postfix.org'
Subject:
I apologize if this is answered in the documention. but I'm having t
I apologize if this is answered in the documention. but I'm having trouble
finding where the "ENVELOPE RECORDS" section of the postcat output is
described.
Most particularly, I'm concerned about the following three fields:
named_attribute: dsn_orig_rcpt=rfc822;em...@example.com
original_recipien
On 15/04/10 17:28, Ignacio García wrote:
> The way I think this could be solved is by having a program that:
>
> 1.- Checks the logs for authenticated smtp usage and saves
> smtp_authenticated_user, originating IPs, and country, which is
> dicovered using ip geolocation.
> 2.- During the following
Hello,
In fact the right configuration is smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
cidr:/etc/postfix/ehlo_maps.cidr
If the remote smtp server (Sender) has a buggy TLS, so I can refuse the use
of STARTTLS by this server.
So my problem is now solved.
Thanks to all and sorry if I did not read the
On 4/16/2010 1:31 PM, fakessh wrote:
hi all
hi wieste
hi all users of this list
hi much many people
good god, I come with the same question
I always wonder how to build a catch-all
I asked the same question on the list dovecot
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg22963.html
Stephen Carville:
> Today Postmaster forwarded me a message that appear to be a bounce
> notification for a Success DSN from postfix. The original DSN appears
> to have originated on the postfix server (mx01.lereta.com). Frankly I
> didn't know they were being sent and prefer they not be. Is the
hi all
hi wieste
hi all users of this list
hi much many people
good god, I come with the same question
I always wonder how to build a catch-all
I asked the same question on the list dovecot
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg22963.html
after discussion, it appears that the w
Today Postmaster forwarded me a message that appear to be a bounce
notification for a Success DSN from postfix. The original DSN appears
to have originated on the postfix server (mx01.lereta.com). Frankly I
didn't know they were being sent and prefer they not be. Is there
anyway to turn off just
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:28:33AM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Franck MAHE wrote:
>
> > How to force some remote smtp server not to use TLS? I found the way
> > for me to use the clear communication to send emails to specific
> > domains, but I'm not able t
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Franck MAHE wrote:
> How to force some remote smtp server not to use TLS? I found the way for me
> to use the
>clear communication to send emails to specific domains, but I'm not able to
>find a solution
>for my issue. Any clue?
I think smtp_tls_policy_maps mi
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:24:52AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > However, the re-queued mail gets delivered to the mailbox. Is this
> > default behavior? Can it be changed?
>
> The smtpd_*_restrictions apply ONLY when mail arrives via SMTP.
>
> However, header_checks, body_checks and externa
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:16:22PM +0100, Gregory BELLIER wrote:
> However, I didn't ask if new code was necessary in Postfix so it can be
> aware of a new cipher. As you said, it's automatical. I asked if, in your
> opinion, it would be necessary to build postfix (as is) against a new
> OpenSS
On 4/16/2010 8:59 AM, Bernd Nies wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to rewrite an email address that contains invalid characters?
Example: Rewrite ":u...@domain.com" to "u...@domain.com" -- stripping
of the leading ":" (colon).
I read through the Postfix Address Rewriting README [1] but did not
find a
Bernd Nies:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to rewrite an email address that contains invalid characters?
>
> Example: Rewrite ":u...@domain.com" to "u...@domain.com" -- stripping
> of the leading ":" (colon).
>
> I read through the Postfix Address Rewriting README [1] but did not
> find a hint.
Post
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 16:22 +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
> On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
> > From: Birta Levente
> > Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
> > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
> >
> >
> >> My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
> >>
>
Hi,
Is it possible to rewrite an email address that contains invalid characters?
Example: Rewrite ":u...@domain.com" to "u...@domain.com" -- stripping
of the leading ":" (colon).
I read through the Postfix Address Rewriting README [1] but did not
find a hint. Source routing looks close but that
Birta Levente:
> On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
> > From: Birta Levente
> > Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
> > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
> >
> >
> >> My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
> >>
> >> In the main.cf:
> >>
> >> content_fil
On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
From: Birta Levente
Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = ine
Patric Falinder:
> Hi,
>
> I have all my users (addresses, passwords etc) in a MySQL-database thats
> not on the same server. So I was just wondering if its possible to put
> every mail in the queue when the database is down for some reason?
> Right now it just return a error message that it can't
Wietse Venema wrote:
Rudy Gevaert:
Hello postfix users,
I have question concerning the hold queue.
I have a smtpd_*_restriction map that puts certain mails in the hold
queue. (E.g. phishing messages).
My idea was to then update the restriction to DISCARD or REJECT the
message and to move the
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 10:04 -0300, Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> Hi, all
>
>
> Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
> my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
>
> I read about that, but not in official documentation.
>
> I want understand how this works and how
Hi,
I have all my users (addresses, passwords etc) in a MySQL-database thats
not on the same server. So I was just wondering if its possible to put
every mail in the queue when the database is down for some reason?
Right now it just return a error message that it can't find the user and
stuff so t
Rudy Gevaert:
> Hello postfix users,
>
> I have question concerning the hold queue.
>
> I have a smtpd_*_restriction map that puts certain mails in the hold
> queue. (E.g. phishing messages).
>
> My idea was to then update the restriction to DISCARD or REJECT the
> message and to move the mails
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 4:52 PM:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner
>> wrote:
>>> Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
>>>
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my me
Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-04-15 groups wrote:
Syntax follow up question...
1.2.3.4 REJECT
or
1.2.3.4 REJECT
1.2.3.4 REJECT
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
Ansgar..
Thank you..
a tab issue "bit me" sometime ago in BSD hence the
question..
Charles
On 2010-04-15 groups wrote:
> Syntax follow up question...
>
> 1.2.3.4 REJECT
> or
> 1.2.3.4 REJECT
1.2.3.4 REJECT
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning."
--Joel Spolsky
30 matches
Mail list logo
