Re: restrict nrcpt

thanks for all -bharathan On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > K bharathan: > > hi all > > is there a way to restrict a sender to send only to a fixed no.of > recipients > > in one mail! i want this to be kept as a general rule on my smtp out > server > > Other people have a

Re: ot: opinions about NiX Spam

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:23:32PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Voytek Eymont put forth on 3/20/2010 5:52 PM: > > one of the blacklist I use it is ix.dnsbl.manitu.net > > > > to my knowledge, it has been OK since I've set it up, with no known > > complaints > > > > what is the user's opinions on

Re: [PATCH] support milter protocol 6 and 2 negotiation

Hi, In <20100321010757.a9eb21f3...@spike.porcupine.org> "Re: [PATCH] support milter protocol 6 and 2 negotiation" on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:07:57 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse Venema: >> Kouhei Sutou: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Postfix 2.7.0 supports milter protocol 2, 3, 4 and >> > 6. P

Re: [PATCH] support milter protocol 6 and 2 negotiation

Wietse Venema: > Kouhei Sutou: > > Hi, > > > > Postfix 2.7.0 supports milter protocol 2, 3, 4 and > > 6. Postfix with milter_protocol=6 accepts a connection from > > a milter that uses milter protocol 2. But its milter session > > is broken because Postfix sends SMFIC_DATA event to the > > milter.

Re: ot: opinions about NiX Spam

Am 21.03.2010 00:23, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > Voytek Eymont put forth on 3/20/2010 5:52 PM: >> one of the blacklist I use it is ix.dnsbl.manitu.net got very less problems with them anyway you can avoid problems with rbls if you use them selective i.e only for 4 dotted reverse hostnames or known d

Re: ot: opinions about NiX Spam

Voytek Eymont put forth on 3/20/2010 5:52 PM: > one of the blacklist I use it is ix.dnsbl.manitu.net > > to my knowledge, it has been OK since I've set it up, with no known > complaints > > what is the user's opinions on it's usefulness ? This is one of the downsides to fully automated low thres

Re: overide transport table

Am 19.03.2010 12:42, schrieb Wietse Venema: > Robert Schetterer: >> Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema: >>> Robert Schetterer: Hi @ll, is there a way to overide transport table for specific sender domains >>> >>> Content filter overrides transport_maps. >>> >>> Wiets

overriding bl rejections: recipient_no_checks ?

I have a user getting rejects from several valid senders based on ix.dnsbl.manitu.net blacklist, like: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from smtpout6.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.166]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [213.180.147.166] blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Spam sent to the mailhost rela

ot: opinions about NiX Spam

one of the blacklist I use it is ix.dnsbl.manitu.net to my knowledge, it has been OK since I've set it up, with no known complaints what is the user's opinions on it's usefulness ? just in the last two days one user had several valid emails rejected based on NiX Spam bl by the time I looked at

Pflogsumm Version 1.1.3 Released

Pflogsumm version 1.1.3 has *finally* been released. This is a Beta release. From the ChangeLog: rel-1.1.3 20100320 Added long-awaited switches to optionally reduce detail reporting: --bounce_detail=N, --deferral_detail=N, --reject_detail=N, --smtp_detail=N

Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

Hi mouss, Thank you and Reinaldo very much for your help. I'll take a look at it. ;) Mauro On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:14 AM, mouss wrote: > Mauro Faccenda a écrit : >>[snip] >> >> But I don't know yet how to do it with procmail (or similar), and >> that's what I'm asking. >> > > for procmail,

Re: [PATCH] support milter protocol 6 and 2 negotiation

Kouhei Sutou: > Hi, > > Postfix 2.7.0 supports milter protocol 2, 3, 4 and > 6. Postfix with milter_protocol=6 accepts a connection from > a milter that uses milter protocol 2. But its milter session > is broken because Postfix sends SMFIC_DATA event to the > milter. In milter protocol 2, SMFIC_DA

Re: Counting clients in smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit with XFORWARD

Stefan Foerster: > * Wietse Venema : > > Patrick Ben Koetter: > > > When a message reenters from an instance that uses XFORWARD, for example > > > amavis, will Postfix count the IP used twice and, for example, > > > add that to smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit? > > > > Rate limits apply to the r

Re: restrict nrcpt

K bharathan: > hi all > is there a way to restrict a sender to send only to a fixed no.of recipients > in one mail! i want this to be kept as a general rule on my smtp out server Other people have already mentioned the policy plugins. Another possibility is to use the built-in rate limit. http://

Re: Counting clients in smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit with XFORWARD

* Wietse Venema : > Patrick Ben Koetter: > > When a message reenters from an instance that uses XFORWARD, for example > > amavis, will Postfix count the IP used twice and, for example, > > add that to smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit? > > Rate limits apply to the real client IP address not the f

Re: restrict nrcpt

K bharathan a écrit : > hi all > is there a way to restrict a sender to send only to a fixed no.of > recipients in one mail! i want this to be kept as a general rule on my > smtp out server > depends what you mean by "a sender". if you mean "any sender", then the setting is http://www.pos

Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

Mauro Faccenda a écrit : >[snip] >> you mean SMTP, not LMTP... > > Well, SMTP or LMTP, it's a instance to only receive local mails. But, > I don't think it makes any difference here, right? ;) > postfix doesn't have an "LMTP server" (an lmtpd). >[snip] > > But I don't know yet how to do it wit