FYI: Using protocol version 3 is also causing the same errors to be logged.
So we've tried 2, 3, 4, and 6.
Thanks,
Sean
--
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/18/2010 05:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > If the Postfix milter_protocol setting specifies a too high
> > version, the libmilter library simply hangs up without logging
>
> We've tried protocol versions 2, 4, and 6 with the same error. We've also
> tried two d
Original Message
Subject: Re: every...@example.com virtual_alias_maps using ldap query
From: Victor Duchovni
To: Ronie Gilberto Henrich
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Thu Mar 18 2010 14:00:45 GMT-0300
Something like a support for variables (%u) on the left sid
On 03/18/2010 05:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> If the Postfix milter_protocol setting specifies a too high
> version, the libmilter library simply hangs up without logging
We've tried protocol versions 2, 4, and 6 with the same error. We've also
tried two different versions of the libmilt
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:12:32PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
> I find that not all parameters in main.cf can be overridden in
> master.cf with -o.
>
> So far I find that for example header_check , smtpd_data_restrictions,
> and inet_interfaces cannot be overridden in master.cf
> Is there a list
>>> This whitelist is 1409 records long, so indeed as you say very small. I
>>> suppose I could download it and host it locally. Apparently AXFR is not
>>> allowed, but plain text HTTP download is, so that's good enough.
>>> Then I would only need an efficient and robust way for postfix to use
>>>
* Erik Logtenberg :
> Hi,
>
> I have a small question about anvil: every now and then it logs three
> lines about statistics. I don't quite understand what they mean. This is
> an example:
>
> 1/60s for (mx.mydomain.eu:smtp:168.100.1.7) at Mar 17 00:27:28
> Mar 17 00:30:49 mx postfix/anvil[28510]
This whitelist is 1409 records long, so indeed as you say very small. I
suppose I could download it and host it locally. Apparently AXFR is not
allowed, but plain text HTTP download is, so that's good enough.
Then I would only need an efficient and robust way for postfix to use
it.
If they le
Hi List
I find that not all parameters in main.cf can be overridden in
master.cf with -o.
So far I find that for example header_check , smtpd_data_restrictions,
and inet_interfaces cannot be overridden in master.cf
Is there a list of such parameters documented somewhere?
I am using three differe
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> Maybe this is not the best practice, however I don't block any incoming mail
> (destined for a legit address) for the same reason. I use a program called
> SpamAssassin Quarantine and I let it scan for the spam.
>
content scanning every mess
Maybe this is not the best practice, however I don't block any incoming mail
(destined for a legit address) for the same reason. I use a program called
SpamAssassin Quarantine and I let it scan for the spam.
Spam is put in quarantine and doesn't effect the users. It sends out an email
every day
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:43:29PM +, Kay wrote:
> I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because
> an IP in a Received From header is blacklisted somewhere.
>
> This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines
> the whole idea of SMTP authentication.
>
> Here's an
On 3/18/2010 1:43 PM, Kay wrote:
Hi guys,
I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because an IP in a
Received From header is blacklisted somewhere.
This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines the whole
idea of SMTP authentication.
Here's an example reject:
550 5
Hi guys,
I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because an IP in a
Received From header is blacklisted somewhere.
This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines the whole
idea of SMTP authentication.
Here's an example reject:
550 5.7.1 This system has been conf
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:54:08PM -0300, Ronie Gilberto Henrich wrote:
> Isn't it a simpler way to accomplish that?
No.
> Something like a support for variables (%u) on the left side?
>
> Example:
> everyone_query_filter = (&(accountStatus=active)(%u=everyone))
This is not "simpler" it is sim
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:18:50AM -0700, Emmett Culley wrote:
> The ones that don't get delivered to the remote mail server have log
> entries like this:
>
> Mar 18 03:15:02 aoakley postfix/smtp[1714]: 6835847611D:
> to=, relay=mail1.domain1.com[xxx.xxx.xx.x]:25,
> delay=0.68, delays=0.06/0.01
Hi Victor,
Thanks also for your reply.
Isn't it a simpler way to accomplish that?
Something like a support for variables (%u) on the left side?
Example:
everyone_query_filter = (&(accountStatus=active)(%u=everyone))
Thanks,
Ronie
Original Message
Subject: Re: every...@exam
On 3/18/2010 10:41 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi All
My problem is describe here
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg16775.html
Basically I have a mysql table with thousands recipients , on the left
hand I have recipient and on the right hand I have the action (REJECT)
and some additi
> H Wietse Venema:
> > Postfix does not send "mail read" notifications.
>
> Hi Wietse
>
> You mean that these notifications are not part of the Postfix System?
Postfix sends *delivery* notifications; for examples of these, see
the output from the "postconf -b" command.
*Delivery* notifications
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Alex wrote:
> Basically I have a mysql table with thousands recipients , on the left hand
> I have recipient and on the right hand I have the action (REJECT) and some
> additional text
>
> u...@domain.tld REJECT Additional text
>
> In case of am mu
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:31:11PM -0300, Ronie Gilberto Henrich wrote:
>The problem about your solution below is that it will go into a loop.
Only if you go out of your way to make it loop. The address
expansion in virtual(5) is recursive, but it stops as soon as address
expands to itself.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:14:31PM -, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> > It works in practice. A few Postfix TLS proxies have been terminating TLS
> > connections, making access control decisions and forwarding unencrypted
> > SMTP to a non-Postfix server for many years now.
> >
> > These systems o
Hi Reinaldo,
The problem about your solution below is that it will go into a loop.
1) Loop: every...@example.com forward to us...@example.com and
every...@example.com, which forward again to us...@example.com and
every...@example.com, and again, and again, and again...
If you are a developer
On 2010-03-18 ?? ?? wrote:
> O/H Wietse Venema :
>> Dimitrios Karapiperis:
>>> When someone sends an e-mail to multiple recipients and requests
>>> read receipt the MDN mechanism works fine but on the receipt
>>> message itself, the sender receives th
O/H Victor Duchovni έγραψε:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:41:24PM +0200, ??
?? wrote:
Postfix does not send "mail read" notifications.
You mean that these notifications are not part of the Postfix System?
They can't be. Postfix is a doctor not
It works in practice. A few Postfix TLS proxies have been terminating TLS
connections, making access control decisions and forwarding unencrypted
SMTP to a non-Postfix server for many years now.
These systems only run "smtpd" as a proxy, and use various internal
services, but otherwise there is no
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:41:24PM +0200, ??
?? wrote:
>> Postfix does not send "mail read" notifications.
>
> You mean that these notifications are not part of the Postfix System?
They can't be. Postfix is a doctor not escalator (oops an MTA not a mail
client
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00:14AM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Tripathy
> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, the machines in the CDE will all have anti-virus and automatic updates
> > enabled.
> >
> > So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "pro
Hi, I have a mail server with postfix-2.5.6 and now in queue there's more
2900 mails that I cann't delivery, I would copy the queue from official mail
server to backup mail server, for this purpose ie I have:
mail server A (official)
mail server B (backup)
on server A I must:
#postfix stop
#c
Hi All
My problem is describe here
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg16775.html
Basically I have a mysql table with thousands recipients , on the left
hand I have recipient and on the right hand I have the action (REJECT)
and some additional text
u...@domain.tld REJE
O/H Wietse Venema έγραψε:
Dimitrios Karapiperis:
Hi
When someone sends an e-mail to multiple recipients and requests
read receipt the MDN mechanism works fine but on the receipt
message itself, the sender receives that recipie...@domain.tld,
recipie...@domain.tld have read the message without
I am seeing that some email appears in the the intended receivers mail box and
some don't.
The ones that don't get delivered to the remote mail server have log entries
like this:
Mar 18 03:15:02 aoakley postfix/smtp[1714]: 6835847611D:
to=, relay=mail1.domain1.com[xxx.xxx.xx.x]:25,
delay=0.6
Please follow instructions in:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Do not change the logging. Use the EXISTING logging.
Wietse
for investigate about my problem I must use:
/usr/sbin/sendmail -bv address
or
strace -p process-id
thanks.
--
Salvatore.
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To: "Sasa"
Cc: "Wietse Venema" ; "Vladimir Dvorak"
;
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:41 PM
Subject: Re:
Sasa:
> sorry but but what logging I can enable for investigate about my problem ?
> for me is very strange that the new mail are delivered and the old mails in
> queue no.
Don't CHANGE the logging. Use the EXISTING logging.
Wietse
>
> --
>
>Salvatore.
>
>
> - Original
for to disable amavis I have removed in master.cf this line:
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
pheraps for this I have (for mail in spool) the error message ? this line
must be enable ?
thanks.
--
Salvatore.
- Original Message -
From: "Sasa"
To: "Wiet
sorry but but what logging I can enable for investigate about my problem ?
for me is very strange that the new mail are delivered and the old mails in
queue no.
Thanks.
--
Salvatore.
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To: "Sasa"
Cc: "Vladimir Dvorak" ;
Sent: Thur
Dimitrios Karapiperis:
> Hi
> When someone sends an e-mail to multiple recipients and requests
> read receipt the MDN mechanism works fine but on the receipt
> message itself, the sender receives that recipie...@domain.tld,
> recipie...@domain.tld have read the message without knowing who
> exactly
Sasa:
> I have disabled amavisd-new and the new mail are deliveriy quickly but for
> all mails that stay in queue I have:
>
> mail transport unavailable
>
> ??
> what I can to delivery all mails ?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Jonathan Tripathy:
> So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and
> not a "store and forward relay"
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
Someone will still have to monitor the logfile, and deal with
"postmaster notification" email depending on how the notify_classes
On 18/03/2010 13:53, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and not a
"store and forward relay"
In SMTP terms, a proxy is effectively the same thing as a
store-and-forward relay. But yes, Postfix will do this very well. For
inbound mail, you ca
I have disabled amavisd-new and the new mail are deliveriy quickly but for
all mails that stay in queue I have:
mail transport unavailable
??
what I can to delivery all mails ?
Thanks.
--
Salvatore.
- Original Message -
From: "Sasa"
To: "Vladimir Dvorak"
Cc:
Sent: Wedne
Hi
When someone sends an e-mail to multiple recipients and requests read
receipt
the MDN mechanism works fine but on the receipt message itself, the
sender receives that
recipie...@domain.tld, recipie...@domain.tld have read the message
without knowing who exactly is the reader; recipent1 or re
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
> BTW, the machines in the CDE will all have anti-virus and automatic updates
> enabled.
>
> So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and not a
> "store and forward relay"
>
>
>
In theory you can to use 'smtpd_proxy
> Any ideas on how to set up an "SMTP Proxy Server" to attain PCI Compliance?
> I literally need postfix to just pass through mail to our ISP's smtp server.
> We would then set outlook to use this local smtp proxy server.
I work for a hosting company, we find it's usually an iterative
process. Thi
On 18 March 2010 23:59, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Does this mean that the service-desk of companies are not compliant either?
Hehe, in a way. Social engineering is thankfully(?) outside the scope
of PCI-DSS compliance.
> 1) Check in phonebook for number of VISA credit card service desk
> 2) Call lis
On Thursday 18 March 2010 13:26:43 Barney Desmond wrote:
> On 18 March 2010 21:57, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> 3. We read the report, and find things like "server exposes its
> hostname in the greeting banner", or "server appears to allow the use
> of the VRFY command".
Does this mean that the
Michael Tokarev:
> A few years ago I implemented a new dict for Postfix, dict_fnmatch.
> It is a shell-style pattern matcher with patterns placed _inline_,
> right in the config file, without any additional files like
> pcre/regex (the simplest dictionaries which does not use indexed
> files) and o
On 18 March 2010 21:57, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Any ideas on how to set up an "SMTP Proxy Server" to attain PCI Compliance?
> I literally need postfix to just pass through mail to our ISP's smtp server.
> We would then set outlook to use this local smtp proxy server.
I work for a hosting compa
Sean Reifschneider:
> I'm reporting this primarily because the other searching I've done has
> turned up this same error message, but with nothing that clearly points out
> what the root of the issue really is. I'm hoping someone can shed some
> light on it.
>
> We've been having little if any lu
I use Postconf's spamrep_byuser to generate daily, well, spam reports by
user,
that works very well, (thank you folks at Postconf)
however, I just got asked for spam rep 'how far back can you go?'
so, basically, I'd like to process all maillogs, around one month worth,
for a particular user.
is
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:09:00PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Ryan Suarez wrote:
> > Does an entry in header_checks need to be defined for each
> > recipient? If so, it wouldn't be feasible due to the number of
> > addresses we have. Is there anoth
Hi Folks,
Any ideas on how to set up an "SMTP Proxy Server" to attain PCI Compliance? I
literally need postfix to just pass through mail to our ISP's smtp server. We
would then set outlook to use this local smtp proxy server.
I'm not entirly sure if a "relay" server is good here, as how would t
Oleksii Krykun:
> If I use smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=yes or
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions=reject_unlisted_recipient options all
> messages to non-existant addresses are rejected.
> But if anybody sends message to multiple addresses in same domain and
> one of them doesn't exist then postfix
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:51:03 +0200
Wesley Bruwer replied:
>Hi there,
>
>I am busy configuring a smtp server for our network. I have postfix,
>Mailscanner and mailwatch installed, they are all working. If I set on
>my PC, that my outgoing mail server is that server, lets say
>192.168.100.180. t
If I use smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=yes or
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=reject_unlisted_recipient options all
messages to non-existant addresses are rejected.
But if anybody sends message to multiple addresses in same domain and
one of them doesn't exist then postfix doesn't deliver such messa
Hi there,
I am busy configuring a smtp server for our network. I have postfix,
Mailscanner and mailwatch installed, they are all working. If I set on
my PC, that my outgoing mail server is that server, lets say
192.168.100.180. then I can send no problem, scans the mail and
everything.
the p
A few years ago I implemented a new dict for
Postfix, dict_fnmatch. It is a shell-style
pattern matcher with patterns placed _inline_,
right in the config file, without any additional
files like pcre/regex (the simplest dictionaries
which does not use indexed files) and others.
The usage is quite
58 matches
Mail list logo
