On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stephen Carville:
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Stephen Carville:
>> >> I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
>> >
>> > How do you know the difference between "not sent" and "
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> Mar 16 12:50:11 mailhost postfix/cleanup[9490]: warning: milter
>inet:127.0.0.1:2092: can't read SMFIC_HEADER reply packet header: Success
What is the output of 'postconf milter_protocol'? This might be totally
unrelated, but I wonder if it ha
I'm reporting this primarily because the other searching I've done has
turned up this same error message, but with nothing that clearly points out
what the root of the issue really is. I'm hoping someone can shed some
light on it.
We've been having little if any luck tracking down an issue where
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, mouss wrote:
> Don't try to hide. if you're not ready to fight, find another job.
Very encouraging but my Postfix server is used by a .mil TLD and the
U.S. Army... I am always ready to fight and help save lives in the
process. I am not hiding the fact I am using
Asai a écrit :
> Greetings,
>
> I'm using Postfix with MySQL, and am trying to restrict certain users to
> send and receive from my network only. I have had marginal success with
> this using a MySQL query.
>
> In the MySQL table, these users have 'local_only' in the smtp_access
> column, all ot
Carlos Mennens a écrit :
> Is it possible to alter the fact that my message headers indicate that
> my MTA is a Postfix server? I don't know if this is possible and while
> I don't specifically want to hide the fact that I use Postfix because
> I love this software more than I could express, I just
ram a écrit :
> I need to implement smtpd login maps on our postfix servers so as
> minimize the chances of a compromised client machine screwing our smtp
> relay.
auth is good, but it's not enough. A compromised client can
authenticate. you still need rate limits and log parsing. and if so,
auth
Ryan Suarez a écrit :
> [snip]
> Cisco Unity allows users to receive their voicemail through email (as
> .wav attachment). This email contains the header
> 'X-CiscoUnity-MessageType'. They can also forward their voicemail to
> another user through email by sending it to
> 'someotheru...@unityser
Can you use a pcre/regex map instead?
Ken
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Ryan Suarez wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain header
>>> is present.
>>>
>>> Eg. Mail to
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:34:32PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>> But this entails that a user remember the unityserver domain. We'd like
>> the process to be cleaner by allowing forwards to their public address.
>> Then our smtp will be responsible for rerouting it to the unity server.
>> Hope this
On 3/17/2010 4:17 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/17/2010 3:53 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain
header
is present.
Eg. Mail to 'm...@mydomain.org' has t
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/17/2010 3:53 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain
header
is present.
Eg. Mail to 'm...@mydomain.org' has the header 'SomeHeader'. I would
like
t
On 3/17/2010 3:53 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain header
is present.
Eg. Mail to 'm...@mydomain.org' has the header 'SomeHeader'. I would like
to reroute this email to
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain header
is present.
Eg. Mail to 'm...@mydomain.org' has the header 'SomeHeader'. I would like
to reroute this email to 'm...@some-server.mydomain.org'.
What is
On 3/17/2010 3:35 PM, Ryan Suarez wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain header
is present.
Eg. Mail to 'm...@mydomain.org' has the header 'SomeHeader'. I would like
to reroute this email to 'm...@some-server.mydomain.org'.
What is the best way to acc
Greetings,
I would like to reroute mail for all our recipients if a certain header
is present.
Eg. Mail to 'm...@mydomain.org' has the header 'SomeHeader'. I would like
to reroute this email to 'm...@some-server.mydomain.org'.
What is the best way to accomplish this in postfix?
thanks,
R
Stephen Carville:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Stephen Carville:
> >> I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
> >
> > How do you know the difference between "not sent" and "not received"?
>
> Good point. All I know is to look at the w
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stephen Carville:
>> I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
>
> How do you know the difference between "not sent" and "not received"?
Good point. All I know is to look at the warning_message_time and see
if i
* Wietse Venema :
> Erik Logtenberg:
> > Wietse, is there a reason why you would not want a permit_rbl_client
> > feature in postfix? If not, then I would like to hereby suggest this
> > feature request.
> > If you would approve the feature request but don't have the time and/or
> > other incentive
On 3/17/2010 12:05 PM, Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
I currently use Postfix 2.6.5 as mail gateway and Exchange 2007 for
internal e-mail. Right now I have a soft TLS requirement on outbound
mail, i.e. Exchange 2007 is setup to connects via TLS only. For Postfix
to require TLS connection from int
I currently use Postfix 2.6.5 as mail gateway and Exchange 2007 for internal
e-mail. Right now I have a soft TLS requirement on outbound mail, i.e.
Exchange 2007 is setup to connects via TLS only. For Postfix to require TLS
connection from internal mail server what would I have to change to t
Giovanni Mancuso:
> Hi,
>
> i have a question about message_size_limit parameter.
>
> Can i set this parameter to get the value from ldap?
>
> Else, can i write a Policy Delegator that do it?
The policy delegation protocol allows you to reject arbitrary
message sizes.
However, you do not know
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Giovanni Mancuso
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a question about message_size_limit parameter.
>
> Can i set this parameter to get the value from ldap?
>
> Else, can i write a Policy Delegator that do it?
>
> Bye
>
I have something that could help you!
On 3/17/2010 4:41 AM, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
Hi,
i have a question about message_size_limit parameter.
Can i set this parameter to get the value from ldap?
Else, can i write a Policy Delegator that do it?
Bye
As documented, message_size_limit accepts a number value, not
a file or path.
ram:
> I need to implement smtpd login maps on our postfix servers so as
> minimize the chances of a compromised client machine screwing our smtp
> relay.
>
> But this cannot be done overnight. There are various clients who use
> different envelope sender domains (for perfectly legitimate reasons)
Jesus Cea:
> >> If I send a mail to "jcea+...@jcea.es", Postfix checks "j...@jcea.es" in
> >> the virtual table and recognizes the user. But when Postfix sends the
> >> message to the storage backend, via LMTP, the destination is
> >> "jcea+...@jcea.es", and I would like to get the LMTP "rcpt to"
>
Patric Falinder skrev 2010-03-17 14:36:
Brian Evans - Postfix List skrev 2010-03-17 13:43:
On 3/17/2010 6:05 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
sure how sasl work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/2010 02:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jesus Cea:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Sorry if the question is a FAQ, but I am a new postfix user, Google has
>> not helped me, neither the postfix online docs.
>>
>> If I send a mail to "jcea+...@jcea.es", Postfix
I need to implement smtpd login maps on our postfix servers so as
minimize the chances of a compromised client machine screwing our smtp
relay.
But this cannot be done overnight. There are various clients who use
different envelope sender domains (for perfectly legitimate reasons) and
I cannot get
...also after increase values I have always:
9B83D1AAD17 1333 Wed Mar 17 14:01:37 milan.notificati...@domain.com
(conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the
initial server greeting)
acco...@domain.biz
...perhaps the parameters (max_servers and maxproc) must be
I have modified the value of:
$max_servers=10 --> (from 2 to 10)
and maxproc in master.cf
smtp-amavis unix - - n - 5 smtp --> (from 2 to 5)
now I must:
#postsuper -r ALL
#postfix flush
for to use a new parameter and for requeue the postfix queue ?
sorry for my banal q
On Mar 17, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Carlos Mennens
wrote:
Is it possible to alter the fact that my message headers indicate that
my MTA is a Postfix server? I don't know if this is possible and while
I don't specifically want to hide the fact that I use Postfix because
I love this software more than
Brian Evans - Postfix List skrev 2010-03-17 13:43:
On 3/17/2010 6:05 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
sure how sasl works..
I attached my main.cf to this mail. I
Jesus Cea:
> Hi all.
>
> Sorry if the question is a FAQ, but I am a new postfix user, Google has
> not helped me, neither the postfix online docs.
>
> If I send a mail to "jcea+...@jcea.es", Postfix checks "j...@jcea.es" in
> the virtual table and recognizes the user. But when Postfix sends the
>
On 03/17/2010 01:59 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
Is it possible to alter the fact that my message headers indicate that
my MTA is a Postfix server?
You can configure that in main.cf via setting
mail_name =
See http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mail_name
Regards,
wolfgang
Sasa:
> I can this errore in log:
>
> Mar 17 11:47:36 mail postfix/smtp[7690]: 77F5726A1E9:
> to=, orig_to=,
> relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1868, delays=0.36/1568/300/0,
> dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out
> while receiving the initial serv
Is it possible to alter the fact that my message headers indicate that
my MTA is a Postfix server? I don't know if this is possible and while
I don't specifically want to hide the fact that I use Postfix because
I love this software more than I could express, I just don't feel the
risk to share wit
On 3/17/2010 6:05 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
> Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
> starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
> sure how sasl works..
> I attached my main.cf to this mail. I have read the Postfix SASL
> Readme but I'm s
Wietse and Victor,
I just wanted to follow up and say thank you to both of you for your
gentle corrections of my misconceptions, as well as all the work you've
done on Postfix itself.
The ease with which I was able to convert my production systems to a
multiple-instance setup was, frankly, astoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Sorry if the question is a FAQ, but I am a new postfix user, Google has
not helped me, neither the postfix online docs.
If I send a mail to "jcea+...@jcea.es", Postfix checks "j...@jcea.es" in
the virtual table and recognizes the user. But wh
I can this errore in log:
Mar 17 11:47:36 mail postfix/smtp[7690]: 77F5726A1E9:
to=, orig_to=,
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1868, delays=0.36/1568/300/0,
dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out
while receiving the initial server greeting)
I us
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Ronie Gilberto Henrich
wrote:
> Hi Reinaldo,
>
> Let me explain better how virtual_alias_maps works in this case:
> 1) Someone send an email to every...@example.com
> 2) Query ldap:everyone result has to be us...@example.com,
> us...@example.com, and so on (all ma
Hi, I have a smtp/pop3 public mail server, this server is in production
enviroment form 3/4 years nobody problems but from two days I have sometimes
that smtpd not responding and I have this error::
2B85826A5B3 8913 Tue Mar 16 16:41:11 listbounc...@domain.eu (delivery
temporarily suspended:
Hello everyone,
I'm running Postfix 2.5.5 on a Debian system and I'm trying to get
AWstats to process my postfix mail log. I've read all FAQ at awstats'
and postix's homepage and none is aplicable.
As I read on http://awstats.sourceforge.net/docs/awstats_faq.html#MAIL
it is said that LogFormat has
>If they won't give you a recipient list the easy way, get one the hard way.
> From http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html,
Thanks, I actually enabled recipient address verification, using temporary
reject codes.
Aaron
Hello,
I think the server does not offer TLS authentication to you at all (only
PLAIN and LOGIN authentication which you could probably use, if you have
valid credentials).
You should really contact the administrator of the server and clarify
things up - how are you supposed to authenticate
Thats just it, I'm not even sure if I have configured it right and I'm
starting to think there is something wrong with it cause I'm not 100%
sure how sasl works..
I attached my main.cf to this mail. I have read the Postfix SASL Readme
but I'm still not sure about how it works or if my config is
Hi!
I act as a "spamcheck"-relay for a couple of servers but I get this
error message for one server when I'm trying to relay a message to it:
Mar 17 10:28:07 myrelay postfix/smtp[4910]: 1358410A329:
to=, relay=mail.domain.se[81.228.XXX.XXX]:25, delay=0.4,
delays=0.08/0.01/0.27/0.05, dsn=5.7
Hi,
i have a question about message_size_limit parameter.
Can i set this parameter to get the value from ldap?
Else, can i write a Policy Delegator that do it?
Bye
mouss wrote:
ram a écrit :
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
Hi,
we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute
force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound
spam.
The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform
50 matches
Mail list logo
