As a flashback.
We could pinpoint the problem and it wasn't Postfix but sort of email scanner
as suggested here
Sorry for bothering you, though it might have taken a bit more to find the
problem without excluding "Postfix branch" first
Thank you a lot
best regards
hannu
-Original Messag
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
> On Tue, March 2, 2010 9:58 am, Patric Falinder said:
>
>> I'm getting a couple of this "bad header" messages:
>>
>> 250 2.6.0 Ok, message with invalid header discarded, id=18740-03 -
>> Non-encoded 8-bit data (char F6 hex) in message header 'Subject':
>> Subject: Tar krafto
donovan jeffrey j:
>
> On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix fsspace test program.
> >
> > - Download any Postfix source code that compiles on your system.
> >
> > - cd into the source tree, then execute the following commands:
> >
> >m
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix fsspace test program.
- Download any Postfix source code that compiles on your system.
- cd into the source tree, then execute the following commands:
make makefiles
cd src/util
make fsspace
Wietse Venema:
> donovan jeffrey j:
> >
> > On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
> >
> > >> this is default on all my systems.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> MX1
> > >> /dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
> > >>
> > >> MX2
> > >> /dev/disk0s3 234G46G
donovan jeffrey j put forth on 3/1/2010 8:06 AM:
> Greetings
>
> I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just popped
> up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system storage is ?
What filesystem are you using? Are you running out of inodes?
/$ df -i
--
Stan
donovan jeffrey j:
>
> On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
>
> >> this is default on all my systems.
> >
> >>
> >> MX1
> >> /dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
> >>
> >> MX2
> >> /dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
> >>
> >>
It may be
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
this is default on all my systems.
MX1
/dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
MX2
/dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
Can you show the partitioning of these systems?
Thanks
thats all i hav
> this is default on all my systems.
>
> MX1
> /dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
>
> MX2
> /dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
>
>
Can you show the partitioning of these systems?
Thanks
Daniel Reinhardt
Website: www.cryptodan.com
Email:
crypto...
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von donovan jeffrey j :
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system
storage is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows < 20% on
* Kaleb Hosie :
> When a user emailed one of our customers, this line came up in the logs:
>
> Mar 2 15:43:22 mailgate postfix/smtp[4830]: 89423170093:
> to=,
> relay=domain.com.inbound15.mxlogicmx.net[208.65.144.13]:25, delay=1.4,
> delays=0/0/0.27/1.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Backend Replied
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:04:29PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> >> It's not
> >> possible to figure out which ciphers are offered to TLS clients on my
> >> server?
> >
> > It is possible, but you will most likely shoot yourself in the foot if
> > you try to use this information to adjust Postfix settings.
On 3/2/2010 2:30 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
192.168.0.110:126 inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reje
Le 02/03/2010 22:01, Kaleb Hosie a écrit :
When a user emailed one of our customers, this line came up in the logs:
Mar 2 15:43:22 mailgate postfix/smtp[4830]: 89423170093: to=,
relay=domain.com.inbound15.mxlogicmx.net[208.65.144.13]:25, delay=1.4,
delays=0/0/0.27/1.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
When a user emailed one of our customers, this line came up in the logs:
Mar 2 15:43:22 mailgate postfix/smtp[4830]: 89423170093: to=,
relay=domain.com.inbound15.mxlogicmx.net[208.65.144.13]:25, delay=1.4,
delays=0/0/0.27/1.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Backend Replied
[dc87d8b4.0.970491.00-0
Hi,
>> It's not
>> possible to figure out which ciphers are offered to TLS clients on my
>> server?
>
> It is possible, but you will most likely shoot yourself in the foot if
> you try to use this information to adjust Postfix settings.
>
> The Postfix defaults are chosen carefully, and act a barr
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:30:21PM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Ok - inferring from that, I tried:
> 192.168.0.110:128 inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authentic
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
192.168.0.110:126 inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:42:37PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> > Postfix settings are documented in postconf(5). Unless you are an SSL
> > expert who understands OpenSSL source code in detail, you really should
> > not change the default settings, and generally don't need to know what
> > they are.
>
>
Hi,
> Postfix settings are documented in postconf(5). Unless you are an SSL
> expert who understands OpenSSL source code in detail, you really should
> not change the default settings, and generally don't need to know what
> they are.
So is it at OpenSSL compile time that the ciphers would be spe
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> 192.168.0.110:126 inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>
> connect with Thund
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I would have sworn I used to use Thunderbird with "SSL" specified and
connected to my Postfix servers fine. Now, I can only connect in "TLS"
mode. What did I break?
You no longer have smtps port enabled?
excerpted from master.cf - using non-standard port numbers f
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:15:17PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> > Most unlikely. I am not aware of any legacy versions of Postfix that
> > support only SSLv2. Provided you have Postfix 2.3 or later, the TLS
> > support is sufficiently modern and robust.
>
> I'm not happy saying that it's probably older t
Hi,
> Most unlikely. I am not aware of any legacy versions of Postfix that
> support only SSLv2. Provided you have Postfix 2.3 or later, the TLS
> support is sufficiently modern and robust.
I'm not happy saying that it's probably older than that.
> OpenSSL 1.0.0 will be released shortly, if you
Charles Marcus:
> On 2010-03-02 2:51 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > You've likely been using STARTTLS only, which doesn't require a key exchange
> > as SSL/TLS does.
>
> ? You sure about that? I use only STARTTLS, and I always have to do the
> 'Confirm Security Exception' dance to accept the certifi
On 2010-03-02 2:51 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You've likely been using STARTTLS only, which doesn't require a key exchange
> as SSL/TLS does.
? You sure about that? I use only STARTTLS, and I always have to do the
'Confirm Security Exception' dance to accept the certificate the first
time I send a
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:09:08PM -0500, Alex wrote:
> I have an existing old postfix TLS server set up and working
> successfully. It was created several years ago and has been working
> fine ever since.
You don't have to upgrade Postfix.
> I'm wondering what the benefits would be with
> upgra
If you want you can try compiling it yourself with the VDA-patch, it's
not hard.
Just do step 3 on this guide:
http://howtoforge.com/virtual-users-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-squirrelmail-ubuntu-9.10
Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
I took the administration of an old (Debian Etch + some Backp
Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
I took the administration of an old (Debian Etch + some Backports)
Postfix server and in its main.cf file, there is an important parameter:
virtual_mailbox_limit_maps.
It is used that way:
virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/sql/vmailsize
/etc
Gregory BELLIER:
> Ok then, no problem, I'll just build in a different way and at the make
> makefiles, I use the option CCARGS='-DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\"/opt/postfix\"'
>
> Then, the make install, root_folder = /opt/postfix
When the "make install" procedure says:
Please specify the prefix for in
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Gregory BELLIER put forth on 3/2/2010 6:03 AM:
Hi !
I downloaded postfix-2.7.0 and I need to manually build it.
The goal is to place everything in a different folder than usual :
/opt/postfix
http://www.postfix.org/INSTALL.html
4.4 - Overriding built-in pa
Gregory BELLIER put forth on 3/2/2010 6:03 AM:
> Hi !
>
> I downloaded postfix-2.7.0 and I need to manually build it.
> The goal is to place everything in a different folder than usual :
> /opt/postfix
http://www.postfix.org/INSTALL.html
4.4 - Overriding built-in parameter default settings
Al
On Tue, March 2, 2010 9:58 am, Patric Falinder said:
> I'm getting a couple of this "bad header" messages:
>
> 250 2.6.0 Ok, message with invalid header discarded, id=18740-03 -
> Non-encoded 8-bit data (char F6 hex) in message header 'Subject':
> Subject: Tar kraftorder i F\\366renade arabemir...
Hi !
I downloaded postfix-2.7.0 and I need to manually build it.
The goal is to place everything in a different folder than usual :
/opt/postfix
To do that at the make install, I set the root_folder at /opt/postfix
and then at the next questions, the default choice is good for me.
However,
Hi!
I'm getting a couple of this "bad header" messages:
250 2.6.0 Ok, message with invalid header discarded, id=18740-03 -
Non-encoded 8-bit data (char F6 hex) in message header 'Subject':
Subject: Tar kraftorder i F\\366renade arabemir...)
I think its because there is an "ö" -letter in the
Here is my 2 pence (Please someone correct me if I'm wrong).
STARTTLS and TLS do eventually use the TLS protocol (Which I think is just an
updated version of SSL). Different being is that with STARTTLS, the SMTP client
(e.g. Thunderbird) will connect to the server unencrypted, then if the smtp
Dear Noel
Your hint was useful too! The way suddenly seemed much too complicated and
using the content_filter statement is the point where vw will definitely not
be able to distinguish in- and outbound messages (in theory). Otherwise
following your idea I could have forwarded outbound mail dir
On 2.3.2010, at 9.18, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the way.
>
> Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
> in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix context?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL tries
Bill Landry put forth on 3/2/2010 2:01 AM:
> On 3/1/2010 11:51 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
>>> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the
>>> way.
>>>
>>> Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "
On 3/1/2010 11:51 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the
way.
Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix cont
40 matches
Mail list logo
