David Schraeder put forth on 2/26/2010 2:13 PM:
> How are you guys getting those stats on the blocks?
Alternatively, try pflogsumm:
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html
If you use Debian you can install pflogsumm via aptitude.
--
Stan
Daniel Morgan put forth on 2/26/2010 12:04 AM:
>> myhostname = apac3.apac.org.ni
>
> In DNS: apac3.apac.org.ni = 165.98.119.11
> BUT
> 165.98.119.11 != apac3.apac.org.ni
> 165.98.119.11 == pppleon11.ibw.com.ni.
Post the rejected transaction(s) from your logs please. It's likely they
are rejectin
Dear
I would like to implement multiple instances on my 2.7 postfix.
After read the documentation (perhaps my english is very poor) i need to
have a confirmation.
did i need to disable master_service_disable and specify an IP address
for each instance in inet_interfaces token ?
Or
Is there a k
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:09:06PM +0100, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> Thanks for the replies, Wietse and Victor.
>
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>>> Would "/file/name" contain one domain per line?
>>>
>>> And would changes require "postfix reload"?
>> Yes, and yes. If you use an indexed table (cdb, hash
David Schraeder:
> How are you guys getting those stats on the blocks?
awk '
/blocked using [^;]+;/ { stats[$20]++ }
END { for (name in stats) print name, " ", stats[name] }
' /var/log/maillog
Wietse
Thanks for the replies, Wietse and Victor.
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Would "/file/name" contain one domain per line?
And would changes require "postfix reload"?
Yes, and yes. If you use an indexed table (cdb, hash, btree, ...) instead,
the reload is not required, the trivial-rewrite service in
How are you guys getting those stats on the blocks?
Quoting listserv.traf...@sloop.net:
Recently, I've noticed a lot more spam. In checking the logs I find
that zen.spamhaus.org has really lost ground in terms of rejections.
I use zen and bl.spamcop.net. In the past, zen had >10 times the
number of hits that bl.spamcop.net did.
zen doesn't seem
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:05:38PM +0100, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> The relay_domains documentation says:
> Specify a list of host or domain names, "/file/name" patterns ...
>
> Would "/file/name" contain one domain per line?
>
> And would changes require "postfix reload"?
Yes, and yes. If you use
Wolfgang Zeikat:
> The relay_domains documentation says:
> Specify a list of host or domain names, "/file/name" patterns ...
>
> Would "/file/name" contain one domain per line?
Zero or more patterns per line, with patterns separated by one or
more space, tab, carriage return or newline characters
The relay_domains documentation says:
Specify a list of host or domain names, "/file/name" patterns ...
Would "/file/name" contain one domain per line?
And would changes require "postfix reload"?
Best regards,
wolfgang
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Pavel Urban wrote:
> open(OUTFILE,"|$Config{'mailer'}") or die "Can't execute
> $Config{'mailer'}: $!\n";
> print OUTFILE "To: $Config{'mailto'}\n";
> print OUTFILE "From: $Config{'mailfrom'}\n";
> print OUTFILE "Subject: Logwatch for $Config{'hostname'} (
Recently, I've noticed a lot more spam. In checking the logs I find
that zen.spamhaus.org has really lost ground in terms of rejections.
I use zen and bl.spamcop.net. In the past, zen had >10 times the
number of hits that bl.spamcop.net did.
zen doesn't seem to have blocked me, because I can han
All right. I try to pinpoint the problem from somewhere else.
Thank you
hannu
Lähettäjä: Wietse Venema [wie...@porcupine.org]
Lähetetty: 26. helmikuuta 2010 15:30
Vastaanottaja: Niemi Hannu
Kopio: postfix-users@postfix.org
Aihe: Re: Recipient limit..but w
Niemi Hannu:
> Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix/smtpd[32326]: < unknown[10.0.17.127]: RCPT
> TO:
> Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix/smtpd[32326]: > unknown[10.0.17.127]: 250
> 2.1.5 Ok
> Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix/smtpd[32326]: < unknown[10.0.17.127]: RSET
> Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix
On 02/26/2010 01:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Pavel Urban:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've tried to migrate some 90 servers from Sendmail to Postfix, trying
>> to keep the behavior as similar as possible. They were all simple null
>> clients, sending mail via relayhost only. After some time I've noticed
>> t
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: 26. helmikuuta 2010 14:21
To: Niemi Hannu
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Recipient limit..but where?
Niemi Hannu:
> Hello I have now tried to form a log file that contains both happy case (500
> recipi
Pavel Urban:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to migrate some 90 servers from Sendmail to Postfix, trying
> to keep the behavior as similar as possible. They were all simple null
> clients, sending mail via relayhost only. After some time I've noticed
> that some servers are sending their daily logwatch ou
Niemi Hannu:
> Hello I have now tried to form a log file that contains both happy case (500
> recipients) and unhappy one (501 recipients)
>
> To debug the case I created 999 bogus users with username
> us...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi to user...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi
>
> Because the log file is
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 15:43 +0100, Zoltan Balogh wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have an old postfix install where I am getting "timeout after
> CONNECT from" error messages upon e-mails being send from one
> particular host. The user is complaining that he is not able to send
> out any e-mail. Other user
Hello,
I've tried to migrate some 90 servers from Sendmail to Postfix, trying
to keep the behavior as similar as possible. They were all simple null
clients, sending mail via relayhost only. After some time I've noticed
that some servers are sending their daily logwatch outputs with
From: "r...@n
21 matches
Mail list logo
