I have to identify a list of 25 million domains as
whitelisted/blacklisted at some point of time. Does anyone know such
lists which maintain historical info?
---
Gautam
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54:37PM -0500, Andrew Nady wrote:
> Is it possible to provide email service with postfix for a single
> domain that spans on multiple mailservers?
Yes. If you choose a single Internet-facing domain for geographically
diverse organization, you must arrange for internal f
Hi all,
Is it possible to provide email service with postfix for a single domain that
spans on multiple mailservers?
At location A I have 300 users and at location B 400 users. (Total 700 users)
These locations are geographically in different countries.
The users are AD based and each location ha
Jozsef Kadlecsik a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> We plan to add the possibility for our users to choose that messages
> categorized as spam are put on the hold queue instead of the default
> reject. Thus it'll be possible to release the false positives, which
> can make life easier for them.
>
> Curren
DAVID HASSILEV:
>
> Hello, I have tried to search through the list archives but have not found
> what I'm looking for so I thought I'd post to the list.
To implement routing policies depending on message size,
- Implement a Postfix policy daemon to examine the message size
attribute (invoked f
Hello, I have tried to search through the list archives but have not found
what I'm looking for so I thought I'd post to the list.
I currently use MS Exchange to provide outbound email a dual route based on
both a cost metric as well as message size that ultimately goes to the same
smart host,
On 1/25/2010 7:56 AM, Jelle de Jong wrote:
Does somebody know the differences between using SSL over port 465 and
TLS over port 25 in the settings for the Debian icedove MUA? (I want
to make postfix use port 465 for its smtp auth mailrelaying)
There's some overlap of terms here -- it's understa
On 2010-01-25 8:56 AM, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> Does somebody know the differences between using SSL over port 465
> and TLS over port 25 in the settings for the Debian icedove MUA? (I
> want to make postfix use port 465 for its smtp auth mailrelaying)
SMTPS over Port 465 is deprecated. Best is TLS
LinkedIn
Walter Justet requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
James,
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
-Walter
Accept invitation from Walter Justet
http://www.linkedin.com/e/qB3B5040SVrp2HIWv-3fZ6Ke54Thhyz_
Wietse Venema:
> ram:
> >
> > On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:43 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> >
> > > * ram [25/01/2010 14:41] :
> > > >
> > > > All mails are sent by a postfix server and this box has to relay the
> > > > mails to 3 load balanced machines.
> > > > No windows machines in the picture
ram:
>
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:43 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> > * ram [25/01/2010 14:41] :
> > >
> > > All mails are sent by a postfix server and this box has to relay the
> > > mails to 3 load balanced machines.
> > > No windows machines in the picture at all
> >
> > What is the DNS
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:43 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * ram [25/01/2010 14:41] :
> >
> > All mails are sent by a postfix server and this box has to relay the
> > mails to 3 load balanced machines.
> > No windows machines in the picture at all
>
> What is the DNS server? On what OS is it
SZ??KELYI Szabolcs:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * SZ?KELYI Szabolcs :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I can't figure out why but to me it looks like smtpd instances started
> >> from master.cf don't pick up all the parameter assignments. I have an
> >> smtpd transport defined as:
> >>
> >> 10.121.8.1:smtp ine
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * SZÉKELYI Szabolcs :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't figure out why but to me it looks like smtpd instances started
>> from master.cf don't pick up all the parameter assignments. I have an
>> smtpd transport defined as:
>>
>> 10.121.8.1:smtp inet n - n - - s
Victor Duchovni wrote, on 23-01-10 20:27:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>
postconf -e 'smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2, !TLSv1'
>>> Why disable both SSLv2 and TLSv1?! Leave this setting at its default
>>> value, or disable just SSLv2. Does your client
ram:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 06:00 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > ram:
> > > I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
> > > IP's
> > > But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
> > > Doesnt help if I use MX records instead of A records
> > >
* ram [25/01/2010 14:41] :
>
> All mails are sent by a postfix server and this box has to relay the
> mails to 3 load balanced machines.
> No windows machines in the picture at all
What is the DNS server? On what OS is it running?
Emmanuel
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 06:00 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
> > IP's
> > But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
> > Doesnt help if I use MX records instead of A records
> >
> >
> > How do I do
ram:
> I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
> IP's
> But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
> Doesnt help if I use MX records instead of A records
>
>
> How do I do fair loadbalancing with postfix
http://support.microsoft.com/default.a
Hello Postfix folks,
This question doesn't concern postfix directly, but since many of you are
developpers...
I would like to experiment a bit with writing a module for postfix, in C
(not perl or python), and I'm looking for a SMTP and a MIME library.
I would like postfix to submit emails to thi
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 08:59 +0100, Bjørn Ruberg wrote:
> ram wrote:
> > I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
> > IP's
> > But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
>
> Are Windows DNS resolvers involved? If so, see for instance this article
ram wrote:
I try load balancing using a relayhost to a DNS A record with multiple
IP's
But I find that somehosts *always* get more mails than others
Are Windows DNS resolvers involved? If so, see for instance this article
for a lead on why those resolvers think they know better than your DNS
22 matches
Mail list logo
