Re: No SMTP AUTH when TLS enabled

2010-01-01 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* froinds J : > Hello, > I'm having a problem with postfix in F12. > I used to have my email server setup with F10. My setup had TLS > enabled (self signed certs) with SASL using pwcheck_method=auxprop and > CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5. I had virtual accounts. > Everything worked great until I installed F1

No SMTP AUTH when TLS enabled

2010-01-01 Thread froinds J
Hello, I'm having a problem with postfix in F12. I used to have my email server setup with F10. My setup had TLS enabled (self signed certs) with SASL using pwcheck_method=auxprop and CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5. I had virtual accounts. Everything worked great until I installed F12. It was a clean install.

Re: possible bugs in the documentation

2010-01-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Christoph Anton Mitterer: > Quoting Wietse Venema : > > I suppose you can provide text for these? > It would be an honour :) > > 1) > > > The sender domain matches $ href="postconf.5.html#mydestination">mydestination, $ href="postconf.5.html#inet_interfaces">inet_interfaces or > $proxy_interfac

Re: possible bugs in the documentation

2010-01-01 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Quoting Wietse Venema : I suppose you can provide text for these? It would be an honour :) 1) The sender domain matches $href="postconf.5.html#mydestination">mydestination, $href="postconf.5.html#inet_interfaces">inet_interfaces or $proxy_interfaces, but the sender is not listed in $href="

Re: possible bugs in the documentation

2010-01-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Christoph Anton Mitterer: > Hi. > > I might have found some further bugs or improvable positions: > > 1) http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender > tells which senders are accepted with which domains. > It seems however that sen...@domain is also accepted if it is set

Re: possible bugs in the documentation

2010-01-01 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi. I might have found some further bugs or improvable positions: 1) http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender tells which senders are accepted with which domains. It seems however that sen...@domain is also accepted if it is set in virtual_alias_maps and not only f

bug in spamassassin date rule may lead to false spam marking

2010-01-01 Thread Robert Schetterer
Hi @ll happy new year, sorry not really postfix but may relavant for a lot of mailadmins using spamassassin a bug in date rule may lead to wrong spam declaration some big german mail provider have this problems i.e gmx here is the fix http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/FH_DATE_PAST_20XX --

Re: Questions on virtual aliases and mailboxes

2010-01-01 Thread Brian Schang
Viktor: On 12/29/2009 11:47 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: Virtual alias rewriting happens for all domains, not just virtual alias domains. However, if you want a virtual alias domain, you must list it in virtual_alias_domains (which defaults to $virtual_alias_maps). Not listing the domain means:

Re: Email service providers

2010-01-01 Thread Port Able
--- On Thu, 12/31/09, Jacqui Caren-home wrote: for a highly specific (distributed) low overhead delivery system designed to work within the (constantly changing) limitations specified by MSPs the changes postfix required would have ended up as a re-write to work with any decent performance. If M

Re: multi pronged upgrade/migration

2010-01-01 Thread Barney Desmond
I should warn beforehand that I'm probably not giving this as much consideration as would be ideal - that'd mean breaking out a pen and paper to collect my thoughts, which is a tough effort at this time of year :) 2010/1/1 Stan Hoeppner : > What I want to do is: > > 1.  Switch Postfix from relay m

Re: Broken web link

2010-01-01 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jerry : > On this URL: http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html, this link: > http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger results in this error message: > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access /SOURCES/postfinger on this server. > Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.5.4 PHP/5.2.6-3ubuntu

Re: sender-dependent default_transport using FILTER

2010-01-01 Thread Wietse Venema
ram: > On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 09:33 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > ram: > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:43 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > > > > ram: > > > > > I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers > > > > > This is similar to what was discussed in the thre

Re: address_verify expire vs refresh times

2010-01-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Daniel L. Miller: > Me again. After having a problem with trying to connect to a > greylist-protected mailing list, I've been reading & re-reading the docs > on address_verify_negative_expire_time and > address_verify_negative_refresh_time. I know these are different - but > I'm afraid the differ

Broken web link

2010-01-01 Thread Jerry
On this URL: http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html, this link: http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger results in this error message: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /SOURCES/postfinger on this server. Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.5.4 PHP/5.2.6-3ubuntu4.4 with Suhosin-Patch m

Re: sender-dependent default_transport using FILTER

2010-01-01 Thread ram
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 09:33 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > ram: > > > > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:43 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > > ram: > > > > I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers > > > > This is similar to what was discussed in the thread a month ago > > >

address_verify expire vs refresh times

2010-01-01 Thread Daniel L. Miller
Me again. After having a problem with trying to connect to a greylist-protected mailing list, I've been reading & re-reading the docs on address_verify_negative_expire_time and address_verify_negative_refresh_time. I know these are different - but I'm afraid the difference as described in the do

multi pronged upgrade/migration

2010-01-01 Thread Stan Hoeppner
This question touches on far more than Postfix, so I hope it doesn't offend anyone being slightly OT. A little background may help: I built my current Postfix host in late 2005 as a single purpose firewall/gateway to sit in front of an old Ms Exch server, on which I've archived email since 2000.