Re: One domain report e-mails not getting through

On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, The Doctor wrote: > People are sending to a name domain and yet most of their suppliers > are getting bouncing stating error in domain. This makes no sense; show some logs that correspond to the 'problem' you are trying to solve. > I check the DNS record and the MX is correc

One domain report e-mails not getting through

People are sending to a name domain and yet most of their suppliers are getting bouncing stating error in domain. I check the DNS record and the MX is correct. The virtual and the amin.cf files are also correct. Where else sould I look? -- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.

Re: forward mail with a local copy

nunatarsuaq a écrit : > /etc/aliases: > > local_user:local_user, other_u...@domain > please do not top post. google if you don't see what this means. anyway, reread OP and focus on "with the same envelope recipient addr". the bcc options are the easiest way to do what he wants with sto

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

* Walter Breno : > Thanks for the answers, i'm testing the implementation of a modest server, i > have only 15xx accounts near 2000, it's only one domain, i have a > centralized OpenLDAP server where my mail authenticates, i'm using > cyrus-sasl, using submission port to send emails and 25 port to

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

On 12/15/2009 4:03 PM, Walter Breno wrote: > > Thanks for the answers, i'm testing the implementation of a modest > server, i have only 15xx accounts near 2000, it's only one domain, i > have a centralized OpenLDAP server where my mail authenticates, i'm > using cyrus-sasl, using submission port to

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

Thanks for the answers, i'm testing the implementation of a modest server, i have only 15xx accounts near 2000, it's only one domain, i have a centralized OpenLDAP server where my mail authenticates, i'm using cyrus-sasl, using submission port to send emails and 25 port to receveive mail, set smtpd

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

* Walter Breno : > and what do you recommend to use? proc mail? i'm testing the best set of Best practise on the Postfix mailing list is to use only anti-spam tools that do not interfere with Postfix internals e.g. the queue mechanisms etc. > tools for my mail server and accepting sujestions, i'm

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

and what do you recommend to use? proc mail? i'm testing the best set of tools for my mail server and accepting sujestions, i'm using spamassassin and clamav here, i'm sorry i know that is off topic but with a good set of tools the mail server will have best performance. Thanks for help

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:21:53 -0300 Walter Breno replied: >In fact the problem is not on postfix, i'm using mailscanner and i set >header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks and the content of >the file is: /^Received:/ HOLD, when i comment the line on main.cf the >mails are sended correctl

Re: How did this happen??

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:23 AM, wrote: > Did this email really originate from my server? > Do you own or control the IP referenced? 117.206.44.183 would appear to be in India. > How did it get sent? By email. > > Has an account been compromised or is Postfix improperly configured? Possibly

Re: Order (preference) of postscreen processing

Len Conrad: > > To speed up postscreen, is there any advantage in, eg, harvesting > high-volume pregreet or dnsbl IPs into a blacklist that would be > more efficient than pregreet or dnsbl dropping? High-volume pregreet - yes, as long as you use a fast database. High-volume DNSBL - maybe. The DN

Re: ps_dict_put: /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db update took X ms

Stefan Foerster: > > > Probably unrelated: When does postscreen(8) clean up it's database? > > > Periodically? Every X connections? Never? What database sizes are to > > > be expected? > > > > The "delete old records" thread is not yet implemented. I suggest > > that you rotate the cache file each

Re: ps_dict_put: /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db update took X ms

* Wietse Venema : > Stefan Foerster: > > Is it 100ms? I got exactly 882 messages like > > > > postscreen[5486]: warning: ps_dict_put: /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db update > > took 108 ms > > > > with values ranging from 101 to 147 within the last 24 hours on a > > moderately busy system. > > You

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

In fact the problem is not on postfix, i'm using mailscanner and i set header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks and the content of the file is: /^Received:/ HOLD, when i comment the line on main.cf the mails are sended correctly.

Order (preference) of postscreen processing

To speed up postscreen, is there any advantage in, eg, harvesting high-volume pregreet or dnsbl IPs into a blacklist that would be more efficient than pregreet or dnsbl dropping? Len

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

Wietse Venema wrote: Mark Goodge: Wietse Venema wrote: Mark Goodge: The cache has two main functions: 1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and reduce load on both. 2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail acceptance/rejection when the destination

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

Mark Goodge: > Wietse Venema wrote: > > Mark Goodge: > >> > >> The cache has two main functions: > >> > >> 1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and > >> reduce load on both. > >> > >> 2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail > >> acceptance/rejection whe

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

Wietse Venema wrote: Mark Goodge: The cache has two main functions: 1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and reduce load on both. 2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail acceptance/rejection when the destination server is unreachable. If the ca

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

Mark Goodge: > Noel Jones wrote: > > On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: > >> On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote: > >>> On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote: > > What postfix does ? Reject all messages until > I will not be notified an

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

Noel Jones wrote: On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote: On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote: What postfix does ? Reject all messages until I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to recr

How did this happen??

Did this email really originate from my server? How did it get sent? Has an account been compromised or is Postfix improperly configured? Thanks! MESSAGE SOURCE: = Return-Path: Delivered-To: vi...@example.com Received: from localhost (localho

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

On 12/15/2009, Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote: > On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote: >>> On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote: What postfix does ? Reject all messages until I will not be no

Re: How did spam come from localhost??

On 12/15/09 5:16 PM, vi...@wlcr.net wrote: Received: from 58.18.216.190 by example.com; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:13:56 +0800 See the first received line: Received: from 58.18.216.190 by example.com; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:13:56 +0800 localhost line is caused your content filter that lives at 127.0.0

Re: Queue-Id in content filter

Giovanni Mancuso: > Hi, > > I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix. > I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this > content filter? > > It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow. The queue ID is in the first RECEIVED: messag

Re: Queue-Id in content filter

On 12/15/2009 5:21 AM, Giovanni Mancuso wrote: Hi, I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix. I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this content filter? No. It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow. If you write your

Re: ps_dict_put: /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db update took X ms

Stefan F?rster: > While I certainly like the fact that Postfix becomes more and more > "admin friendly" in that it now also logs warnings about performance > issues, I'd like to know how many milliseconds a single request to > update the temporary whitelist may take before a warning is emitted. >

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote: On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote: What postfix does ? Reject all messages until I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to recreate it again. I

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

On 12/15/2009 6:59 AM, Walter Breno wrote: The problem is that my logs doesn't report any error, here is the log connect from host[200.xxx.xxx.xxx] 9B2B16015997C: client=host[200.xxx.xxx.xxx], sasl_method=LOGIN, sasl_username=u...@server.domain.com 9B2B16015997C:

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

On 12/14/2009, Jaroslaw Grzabel (ja...@meil.me) wrote: > Simon Waters pisze: >> It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon >> starts getting email (and spam potentially). This is configurable. >> >> http://www.postfix.org/verify.8.html > Yeah, and it works on the other way rou

Re: store and forward and reject_unverified_recipient

On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote: > On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote: >> >> What postfix does ? Reject all messages until >> I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to >> recreate it again. > It refreshes cache at 3 hours by defa

Re: Authenticated SMTP problem

The problem is that my logs doesn't report any error, here is the log connect from host[200.xxx.xxx.xxx] 9B2B16015997C: client=host[200.xxx.xxx.xxx], sasl_method=LOGIN, sasl_username=u...@server.domain.com 9B2B16015997C: hold: header Received: from hostfc480db78a (host [200.xxx.xxx.xxx])??by serve

Re: forward mail with a local copy

/etc/aliases: local_user:local_user, other_u...@domain -- ToMasz 2009/12/12 mouss : > K K a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> >> I would like to forward all mail as they come(with the same envelope >> recipient addr.) >>  - it is not problem to do it with transport_map, for example: >> domain.tl

Queue-Id in content filter

Hi, I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix. I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this content filter? It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow. Thanks

Re: queue manager delaying delivery of message

Zitat von George Forman : Hi, I am running into a problem where (it seems) queue manager doesn't pickup the queued message for delivery. SMTPD returns a 250 OK at 16:26:39. However, oqmgr doesn't pick it up until 16:35:41. The is no post queue processing on the message. I turned up logging