Re: Local Mails not working

Mr Rob0, I really take exception to your insulting language. This is a Mailing list where people who do not know can learn a few things from others who know. It is NOT a place to insult and demean people. Meanwhile helping is optional, if you do not wish to help, you could easily ignore the Mail.

Sender domain - local user

Hi folks, We are having an email server here running postfix/dovecot using mysql as a backend (virtual user of course).   The problem, or the question we have is, how I can change the @something by default. For example, if a batch job running on the server using userid "daemon" send an emai

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

On 12/10/2009 8:09 PM, Marty Anstey wrote: Rejecting messages inline is a far better solution than generating a bounce or simply dropping the message. Most, if not all spam has a forged sender so generating a bounce is a very bad idea. Rejecting inline is much better than dropping message; at le

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

>> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html >> >> I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix >> to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't >> seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error >> if spa

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html > > I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix > to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't > seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error > if spamc/spa

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html > > I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring > postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is > complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs > to get a 550 error if spamc/spa

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

Thomas Bolioli wrote: http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 erro

Bounce at SMTPD level

http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error if spamc/spamd deter

Re: Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote: > >> Dec 10 18:37:07 zimbra postfix/smtp[542]: 81058E3232: > >> to=, orig_to=, > >> relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=14, delays=8.8/0/0.01/4.8, > >> dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=00532-01, from > >> MTA([127.0.0.1]:1

Re: Limited a user to 1 e-mail per minute

* The Doctor : > Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send? The policyd policy server can do that. -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and jus

Limited a user to 1 e-mail per minute

Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send? -- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630 Merry Christmas 2

Re: Mail from cron delay

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12:36AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > >> It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" > >> and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to > >> understand the 24 delay. > > > > Not really. The message took 1 day to enter the active queue, not >

Re: Mail from cron delay

Emmett Culley: > snip email header > Received: from den1.thisserver.net (den1.thisserver.net [198.202.202.21]) > by g1.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586C400032 > for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:15:59 -0800 (PST) > Received: by den1.thisserver.net (Postfix, from userid 0) >

Re: Mail from cron delay

On 11/30/2009 10:48 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35:02AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > >> It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" >> and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to >> understand the 24 delay. > > Not really. The message t

Re: Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

Thanks for looking into this, I've attached postconf -n output below. If you need some LDAP queries performed, please let me know. See some answers below as well. On Thu, December 10, 2009 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote: > >> after up

Re: does order of postscreen_* params matter?

>As of snapshot 20091209, postscreen searches the whitelist first. great, thanks Len

Re: does order of postscreen_* params matter?

Mark Martinec: > Wietse Venema wrote: > > The postscreen manpage lists the tests in the order of execution. > > Thus, the blacklist is done tested first. If the client is not > > blacklisted, then the whitelist test is done. And so on. > > > > I could swap the order of black/white tests if there i

Re: Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote: > after updating Postfix from 2.4.7.5 to 2.6.5.2 I see some changed You also changed main.cf, or the package update did it for you. > behaviour in the smtp process delivering to our content_filter. The > content filter does not reci

Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

Hi, after updating Postfix from 2.4.7.5 to 2.6.5.2 I see some changed behaviour in the smtp process delivering to our content_filter. The content filter does not recive the part after the recipient_delimiter as RCPT TO anymore. Caused by this we loose this information for any mail going through am

Re: unknown mail transport error

Цитат от Brian Evans - Postfix List : > On 12/10/2009 11:57 AM, c...@mail.bg wrote: >> Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error. >> >> I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one >> and at first I thought everything was working. I am receivi

Re: unknown mail transport error

On 12/10/2009 11:57 AM, c...@mail.bg wrote: > Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error. > > I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one > and at first I thought everything was working. I am receiving emails > to all my mails that are hosted on th

unknown mail transport error

Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error. I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one and at first I thought everything was working. I am receiving emails to all my mails that are hosted on this server, however I can't send mail from my ser

Re: Local Mails not working

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:48:35PM +0100, Alexander wrote: > How do I make LOCAL mails work? > > Attached is output from postconf -n Here I would ask that you spend some time on learning basic computer and email use skills. RTF attachment? Well, at least it was readable, but it would have been be

Re: OT: need some advice as to disto - supplementary

On 9-Dec-2009, at 22:23, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 3) We currently have all our members configured as virtual users with >> all their email stored as maildir stores under /var/mail/example.com. We >> are considering giving each member a personal space, probably under >> /home (there would be no loca

Re: does order of postscreen_* params matter?

Wietse Venema wrote: > The postscreen manpage lists the tests in the order of execution. > Thus, the blacklist is done tested first. If the client is not > blacklisted, then the whitelist test is done. And so on. > > I could swap the order of black/white tests if there is agreement that > the curr

forward mail with a local copy

Hi all, I would like to forward all mail as they come(with the same envelope recipient addr.) - it is not problem to do it with transport_map, for example: domain.tldsmtp:remoteserver BUT i would like to keep a local copy too.(for all addresses) I mean, i have 2 almost identical postfix ser

Re: up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:33:42AM -0800, Brian Neu wrote: > Devdas, that worked! Sorta. > > At least now it reveals another message: > postmap: warning: connect to pgsql server localhost: FATAL: Ident > authentication failed for user "dbmail"? I bet Postfix is not running as user dbmail and y

Re: up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

Devdas, that worked! Sorta. At least now it reveals another message: postmap: warning: connect to pgsql server localhost: FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "dbmail"? but I can psql into the db just fine with those settings. Got it. had to s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ for everything. I h

Re: up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:42:13AM -0800, Brian Neu wrote: > After updating postfix & postgresql (still 8.3 though), postmap lookups > to postgres aren't working anymore. I HAVE recompiled postfix rpm to > include the postgresql libraries. > > > I get: > > ]# postmap -q testus...@advancedopen.

Local Mails not working

Hi, I have already set up DOVECOT + POSTFIX mail server and I can send and receive mails outside my Domain. The problem however is that LOCAL Mail is not working. When I send LOCAL mails, it leaves my system without error messages but it is not received by the recipient. Same thing happens when

up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

After updating postfix & postgresql (still 8.3 though), postmap lookups to postgres aren't working anymore. I HAVE recompiled postfix rpm to include the postgresql libraries. # rpm -q postfix postgresql-server postfix-2.6.5-2.fc11.i586 (This is actually from a fedora12 SRPM) postgresql-serv

Re: [OT?] blocking replies (WAS: whitelisting problem)

Hi Stan, On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:24:53 -0600 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Mikael Bak put forth on 12/9/2009 4:18 AM: > > > I understand why you avoid the real question. But hey - it's your server :-) > > Do you? I have avoided it because these threads can quickly delve into > childish mud slinging i