On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Christopher Adams wrote:
> Okay, it is obvious that my approach to getting assistance is all
> wrong. True, I did not understand the posting protocol, mainly
> because I don't post often to this list. Yes, I did begin the posting
> with the subject of header_checks. Some kind
>
>From: Christopher Adams
>To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 5:51:13 AM
>Subject: Re: header_checks not working correctly
>
>Okay, it is obvious that my approach to getting assistance is all wrong. True,
>I did not understand the posting protocol, mainly because I don
Okay, it is obvious that my approach to getting assistance is all wrong.
True, I did not understand the posting protocol, mainly because I don't post
often to this list. Yes, I did begin the posting with the subject of
header_checks. Some kind fellow gave me some assistance and I attempted to
try t
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, osm...@oc.quimefa.cu wrote:
> Hi I am trying to make postfix to relay all mail except for the ones
> going to a specific domain. For example I want to be able to make
> postfix relay all mail except for domain .ca I was wondering if
> something like this is possible or
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Christopher Adams wrote:
> Okay, no more ignorant posts. I will give you all that I have based on the
> protocol as spelled out.
>
> 1. Summary of the problem: attempting to ban an email address using a hash
> map does not work. The message is delivered anyway.
Sorry, this i
>
>From: Christopher Adams
>To: Postfix users
>Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 5:00:37 AM
>Subject: Re: header_checks not working correctly
>
>Okay, no more ignorant posts. I will give you all that I have based on the
>protocol as spelled out.
>
>1. Summary of the problem: attempting to ban an
Okay, no more ignorant posts. I will give you all that I have based on the
protocol as spelled out.
1. Summary of the problem: attempting to ban an email address using a hash
map does not work. The message is delivered anyway.
2. Error messages: none
3. Logging: Maillog shows that the message wa
Hi I am trying to make postfix to relay all mail except for the ones
going to a specific domain. For example I want to be able to make postfix
relay all mail except for domain .ca I was wondering if something like this
is possible or if there is anything like this: transport_maps.cf *.*
10.25.x
Christopher Adams:
> Thank you for your helpful reply.
>
> So, now I have this in main.cf:
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist
>
> I have a file sender_blacklist:
>
> m...@somplace.org/ REJECT
>
> I issued the command 'postmap
Thank you for your helpful reply.
So, now I have this in main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist
I have a file sender_blacklist:
m...@somplace.org/ REJECT
I issued the command 'postmap hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist'
I iss
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2009-12-07 Christopher Adams wrote:
> > I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
> >
> > I have this in main.cf:
> >
> > header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
> >
> > In the header_checks file, I have this:
> >
>
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Christopher Adams wrote:
> I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
>
> I have this in main.cf:
>
> header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
> In the header_checks file, I have this:
>
> /^From: .*someplace.org/ DISCARD
>
> I did a 'postfix
On 2009-12-07 Christopher Adams wrote:
> I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
>
> I have this in main.cf:
>
> header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
> In the header_checks file, I have this:
>
> /^From: .*someplace.org/ DISCARD
>
> I did a 'postfix reload'
I am trying to ban an address from sending through my system.
I have this in main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
In the header_checks file, I have this:
/^From: .*someplace.org/ DISCARD
I did a 'postfix reload'
Messages from someplace.org are still being delivered. What
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> mouss put forth on 12/7/2009 3:52 PM:
>
> > I'm looking through you, where did you go:
> >
> > : host greer.hardwarefreak.com[65.41.216.221]
> > said: 554 5.7.1 : Client host
> > rejected: Access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> >
> > It is nice
mouss put forth on 12/7/2009 3:52 PM:
> I'm looking through you, where did you go:
>
> : host greer.hardwarefreak.com[65.41.216.221]
> said: 554 5.7.1 : Client host
> rejected: Access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>
> It is nice to not reject mail from people who help you...
Sorry 'bout
Sta[snip]
> Sanity checking and ease of troubleshooting is precisely why I'd kept
> them separated for years, so each check type was in its respective class
> heading. I guess given the things I'm doing with my static lists, it
> makes no sense to continue my current method, given it makes the
> t
Javier Henderson:
> Greetings,
>
> I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the
> failure of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
>
> It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com
> to u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP server dies or becomes
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> mouss put forth on 12/5/2009 7:50 AM:
>
>> you need to read the docs :)
>
> Isn't that always the case here. :)
>
>> an OK in an smtpd_foo_restrictions skips further checks in _that_
>> restriction. so an OK in smtpd_client_restrictions skips further checks
>> and goes
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> /dev/rob0 put forth on 12/5/2009 8:44 PM:
>
>> This post might seem like a gratuitous me-too, and it partly is, but
>> the thing that concerned me, as one of the people responsible for
>> the Spam-L list, was the rejection, in the original post:
>>
>>> Dec 4 13:39:15 gree
Zitat von Javier Henderson :
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/7/2009 1:07 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the
failure of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP ser
* Mark Martinec :
> On Sunday 06 December 2009 13:11:16 Stefan Foerster wrote:
>> 2. The number of SMTP proxy processes busy talking to Postfix went
>> down from 16.44 to 8.73 (5s resolution) - that's a completely
>> unexpected result, possibly flawed by the small data sample.
>> I'll verify this a
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/7/2009 1:07 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure of the
>> LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
>>
>> It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u
On 12/7/2009 1:07 PM, Javier Henderson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure of the
LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com to
u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP serve
Zitat von Javier Henderson :
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure
of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com
to u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP server dies or bec
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure of the
LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com to
u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP server dies or becomes unreachable
for whatever reas
Hi everyone,
I have two relay servers currently working with load balancing. I want
to configure both servers so that each MX relays only certain domain and
the rest of the mail throws it to the other MX. Here is the idea:
I want one MX to get all the mail and throw to the other MX all the mail
t
Wietse Venema :
> Like this?
>Dec 5 20:15:25 server postfix/smtpd[16712]: proxy-accept:
>END-OF-MESSAGE: 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 91BE3547AFE;
>from= to= proto=ESMTP
>helo=
> (with the same form for proxy-reject at END-OF-MESSAGE; the format
> of the reject message would be consiste
Hi all,
I've found, it can be done by setting always_bcc, but it would also make
copies of normally received mail and locally sent one, right? If so, how can
only relayed mail be saved as a local copy on relay host?
Thanks...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:10:15AM +0100, Raffael Schmid wrote:
> The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
> and would like to reject those messages:
> Return-Path:
Almost certainly the actual envelope sender was "MAIL FROM:<>", and
the "MAILER-DAEMON" was created d
On 12/7/2009 7:12 AM, Ricardo Barbosa wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with postfix, I have my postfix set up on the domain
"a.com" and am getting in the queue of emails incoming email for example
the domain from "u...@b.com" to "u...@c.com", the domain "b.com" and
"c.com" with and are not part o
On 12/7/2009 4:10 AM, Raffael Schmid wrote:
Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path:
AFAIK the return-path above is
Hi all,
I
have a problem with postfix, I have my postfix set up on the domain "a.com" and
am getting in the queue of emails incoming email for example
the domain from "u...@b.com" to "u...@c.com", the domain "b.com" and "c.com"
with and are not part of domains that postfix has served as an area.
Raffael Schmid:
> Hi list
>
> Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
> paths in postfix?
>
> The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
> and would like to reject those messages:
> Return-Path:
>
> AFAIK the return-path above is invalid,
Hi
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
>> and would like to reject those messages:
>> Return-Path:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
Already read this and I also would know how to do this. But I thought
maybe this is c
Raffael Schmid put forth on 12/7/2009 4:10 AM:
> Hi list
>
> Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
> paths in postfix?
>
> The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
> and would like to reject those messages:
> Return-Path:
http://www.po
Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path:
AFAIK the return-path above is invalid, as there is only the following
forma
37 matches
Mail list logo
