Could somebody recommend software that filters based on sender id
reputation. I am refering to the sender id that microsoft uses as
opposed to SPF.
Thanks in advance
Thank you!
Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/11/22 Russell Jones :
I know that maximal_queue_lifetime is the time a message is queued before it
is sent back as undeliverable, however what is the configuration option for
how long a message is attempted to be delivered, before a warning me
On 11/21/2009 9:54 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:11:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
[ Robust/neat idea to support sender dependent transport selection. ]
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps (default: empty)
A sender-dependent override for the global defau
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:22:21PM -0600, Russell Jones wrote:
> I know that maximal_queue_lifetime is the time a message is queued before
> it is sent back as undeliverable, however what is the configuration option
> for how long a message is attempted to be delivered, before a warning
> messa
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:11:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> [ Robust/neat idea to support sender dependent transport selection. ]
> sender_dependent_default_transport_maps (default: empty)
>A sender-dependent override for the global default_transport parameter
>setting. The
On 11/21/2009 9:22 PM, Russell Jones wrote:
Hello,
I know that maximal_queue_lifetime is the time a message is queued
before it is sent back as undeliverable, however what is the
configuration option for how long a message is attempted to be
delivered, before a warning message is sent to the ori
2009/11/22 Russell Jones :
> I know that maximal_queue_lifetime is the time a message is queued before it
> is sent back as undeliverable, however what is the configuration option for
> how long a message is attempted to be delivered, before a warning message is
> sent to the original sender saying
Hello,
I know that maximal_queue_lifetime is the time a message is queued
before it is sent back as undeliverable, however what is the
configuration option for how long a message is attempted to be
delivered, before a warning message is sent to the original sender
saying "Hey, this message ha
Recently there have been requests for sending mail with source IP
addresses that depend on the envelope sender. Sometimes the request
appeared to be related to showshoe spamming, and sometimes it
appeared to be a legitimate attempt to protect IP-based domain
reputations of different customers.
Cur
Hi,
(212.58.4.184,212.58.4.247) not worked
(212.58.4.184:3306,212.58.4.247:3306)query arrive to 4.247 but not to 184
212.58.4.184:3306,212.58.4.247:3306 query arrive to 4.184 but not to 247
212.58.4.184:3306 212.58.4.247:3306 query arrive to 4.184 but not to 247
sql_hostnames: 212.58.4.184 212.58.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:04:25AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> I was, perhaps incorrectly, of the opinion that case was not relevant
> in e-mail addresses. I thought that there was an RFC that mentioned
> this; although I cannot find one that specifically mentions case
> folding on the reply to address.
On Nov 21, 2009, at 5:04, Jerry wrote:
Is Yahoo's claim correct or are they simply trying to cover up for a
problem on their end?
As stated, yahoo is at least misleading.
Case MUST be honored in the user name portion (before the @ ).
Otherwise, email assesses are not case sensitive.
Yahh
hi all
hi list
hello, I carry on my installation of postfix, a test user account in which the
test user account I reserve the right to grant or not the test account
I would like to do safely
I do not find myself on the black list RBLs after 24 hours
I quote this message on the list postfix
* Eugene V. Boontseff :
> >>eug...@mail [/usr/local/etc/postfix]# postmap -fq
> >>" >I'd think the regexp is wrong
> Why this regexp is "wrong" for postfix, but isn't wrong for postmap?
postfix matches the HOSTNAME:
ppp92-100-127-177.pppoe.avangarddsl.ru
and/or the IP
92.100.127.177
not
http://w
Eugene V. Boontseff:
> >> eug...@mail [/usr/local/etc/postfix]# postmap -fq
> >> "
Eugene V. Boontseff wrote:
Dear colleagues,
kindly looking for your assistence in the following matter.
To cut off the spamers, I intended to use pcre:table.
main.cf :
...
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/exper,
...
eug...@mail [/usr/local/e
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Eugene V. Boontseff :
Dear colleagues,
kindly looking for your assistence in the following matter.
To cut off the spamers, I intended to use pcre:table.
WOuldn't it be easier to use an RBL instead?
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access p
* Eugene V. Boontseff :
> Dear colleagues,
>
> kindly looking for your assistence in the following matter.
> To cut off the spamers, I intended to use pcre:table.
WOuldn't it be easier to use an RBL instead?
> smtpd_client_restrictions =
>check_client_access pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/e
On 2009-11-21 Jerry wrote:
> I know that this has nothing directly to do with Postfix; however, I
> figured the fastest way to get a serviceable answer would be here.
>
> I maintain a few Yahoo groups. I just received a bulletin from Yahoo
> regarding the updating of their 'Groups'.
>
>
>
> Als
Dear colleagues,
kindly looking for your assistence in the following matter.
To cut off the spamers, I intended to use pcre:table.
main.cf :
...
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/exper,
...
eug...@mail [/usr/local/etc/postfix]# cat exper
/(.*(
I know that this has nothing directly to do with Postfix; however, I
figured the fastest way to get a serviceable answer would be here.
I maintain a few Yahoo groups. I just received a bulletin from Yahoo
regarding the updating of their 'Groups'.
Also in this release is a fix for group moderato
Sean Holdsworth a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> If I allow that address rewite then mail for p...@domain or p...@domain will
> get
> sent on to the MTA with an envelope recipient address of catch...@domain
> rather than their original recipient address.
>
> I've tried various work arounds without success.
I have gone through the postfix docs on the main website. Understanding how
it works is my problem. I have just installed postfix and would want it to
relay outgoing mail to my smart host and for all mail it receives for my
domains to my internal exchange server. I will check the DEBUG_README, and
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Sean Holdsworth wrote:
> Suppose I have a catchall delivery for a (virtual) domain into a
> mailbox:
>
>@domain => A
>
> I also have a couple of other addresses in the same domain delivering to
> their own mailboxes:
>
>p...@domain => B
>p...@domain => C
>
> So
24 matches
Mail list logo
