RE: Required sender email address while table lookup for rejecting mails for unknown local users

Hi Magnus, Thanks for replying... Yup, I know about spoofing and I'm taking care of it in my system. So let's assume that user is not spoofed. Now I have scenario: Only some users can send email to particular user. When I receive email on postfix, I just want to query: Is this sender can send

Relaying problems

Noel Jones put forth on 11/11/2009 10:16 PM: > But commas do make it prettier to look at. Pfft. I removed all my commas recently to improve aesthetics. Now you're telling me I have to put 'em back in? Sheesh. :P -- Stan

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Lists wrote: Yeah I just had a look at the postsuper -h ALL - it only seems to move emails present in the queues at that moment to the hold bin but doesn't put subsequent ones in their. Is there a way for it to keep moving them until the postsuper -r ALL is How about: check_recipient_acces

Re: Relaying problems

Hi, >> But commas do make it prettier to look at. > > My reality has been shaken, and everything I previously thought I knew drawn > into question. Yeah, crazy. I always had the smtpd_recipient_restrictions separated by a comma, all on one line, until recently when I saw so many others using it o

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Lists wrote: Hi All, We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted which renders the boxes unreachable. This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server (running MailScanner spamassassin a

答复: ????: ????: who know how does init ial_destination_concurrency and default _destination_concurrency_limit work?

Yes, that is what I mentioned before. It looks like concurrency setting not work. Best regrads! Coofucoo -邮件原件- 发件人: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix. org] 代表 Wietse Venema 发送时间: 2009年11月12日 3:16 收件人: Dhiraj Chatpar 抄送: postfix-users@postfix.org; victor.

Re: Relaying problems

Noel Jones wrote: On 11/11/2009 10:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: I'm guessing even v1.x required commas between restrictions? Nope, a comma between restrictions is not now and has never been a requirement. Comma, space, LF+space are all considered equal. Mix and match to your heart's desir

Re: Relaying problems

On 11/11/2009 10:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: I'm guessing even v1.x required commas between restrictions? Nope, a comma between restrictions is not now and has never been a requirement. Comma, space, LF+space are all considered equal. Mix and match to your heart's desire. But commas do

Re: Relaying problems

Alex wrote: Hi, I hoped someone could clarify for me the difference between check_sender_access and check_client_access? I don't know why the docs are unclear to me. Both restrictions look up something in an access table, and return a result. With check_client_access, the thing that is looked

Re: Relaying problems

On 11/11/2009 8:18 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I hoped someone could clarify for me the difference between check_sender_access and check_client_access? I don't know why the docs are unclear to me. When is a sender_access restriction used and when is a client_access restriction used? I thought the clien

Re: Relaying problems

Hi, I hoped someone could clarify for me the difference between check_sender_access and check_client_access? I don't know why the docs are unclear to me. When is a sender_access restriction used and when is a client_access restriction used? I thought the client_access was based on the envelope in

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

On 11/11/2009 7:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Lists: Wietse Venema wrote: Lists: Hi All, We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted which renders the boxes unreachable. This causes a 550 error to be sent b

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Eero Volotinen wrote: Lists wrote: Hi All, We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted which renders the boxes unreachable. This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server (running Mai

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Lists: > Wietse Venema wrote: > > Lists: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes > >> (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted > >> which renders the boxes unreachable. > >> This causes a 550 error to be sent back to

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Wietse Venema wrote: Lists: Hi All, We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted which renders the boxes unreachable. This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server (running MailSca

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Maybe you can tell spam filter postfix to HOLD all mails to your domains and then just remove hold and postsuper -H ALL ? like this: http://wiki.zimbra.com/index.php?title=Irfan-Notes#Holding_the_Postfix_Queue_at_time_of_server_migration.2Fmaintenance and man 5 access and look for HOLD ? --

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Lists wrote: Hi All, We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted which renders the boxes unreachable. This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server (running MailScanner spamassassin a

Re: How to stop postfix sending emails

Lists: > Hi All, > > We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes > (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted > which renders the boxes unreachable. > This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server > (running MailScanner spamassa

How to stop postfix sending emails

Hi All, We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes (mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted which renders the boxes unreachable. This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server (running MailScanner spamassassin and postfix).

Re: Test e-mailservice

Cameron Smith wrote: Fixed! The solution was to set in the mail servers: relayhost = your.server.com All the instructions when setting up behind a firewall seemed to say leave that at relayhost = but adding my gateway IP makes it work so I am happy :) Yes, that i

Re: Test e-mailservice

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Phillip Smith wrote: > >> 2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar : >> >>> I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined >>> with >>> NRPE to monitor all my servers and services. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> NRPE allows you to connect to t

Re: Transport question

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > My original issue is still existing in that mail is no longer routing >> through my mail gateway but is being sent directly from the mail server. >> >> >> Any pointers in how to trouble shoot this? >> > > transport maps: > > http://www.po

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

* Ali Majdzadeh : > Viktor, > Thanks for your attention. You are right, but unfortunately we have got some > in-house developed mail clients which are bound to use cram-md5 > authentication mechanism. Well, I think I should investigate on integrating > LDAP to our architecture and figure out the ne

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

* Ali Majdzadeh : > Patrick, > Thanks a lot for your help. I will test the mentioned configuration and will > post the results to the list. I hope it works. Unfortunately, I do not have > so much knowledge about LDAP, but I do know that it is possible to store > Kerberos principals in an LDAP struc

Re: Transport question

My original issue is still existing in that mail is no longer routing through my mail gateway but is being sent directly from the mail server. Any pointers in how to trouble shoot this? transport maps: http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html , http://www.nooblet.org/blog/2007/postfix-tran

Re: Test e-mailservice

Phillip Smith wrote: 2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar : I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined with NRPE to monitor all my servers and services. +1 NRPE allows you to connect to the system being monitored, and execute any command on the local system, returning the re

Re: Transport question

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/11/2009 3:03 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: > >> I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it >> through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were >> showing that route. >> >> Then I tried to mov

Re: Test e-mailservice

2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar : > I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined with > NRPE to monitor all my servers and services. +1 NRPE allows you to connect to the system being monitored, and execute any command on the local system, returning the result to the Nagios se

Re: Transport question

On 11/11/2009 3:03 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were showing that route. Then I tried to move to smtps and I can send but the mail is no longer routing to the ga

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

Viktor, Thanks for your attention. You are right, but unfortunately we have got some in-house developed mail clients which are bound to use cram-md5 authentication mechanism. Well, I think I should investigate on integrating LDAP to our architecture and figure out the new opportunities. Thanks agai

Re: Transport question

I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were showing that route. Then I tried to move to smtps and I can send but the mail is no longer routing to the gateway, it is sending directly from the mailser

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

Patrick, Thanks a lot for your help. I will test the mentioned configuration and will post the results to the list. I hope it works. Unfortunately, I do not have so much knowledge about LDAP, but I do know that it is possible to store Kerberos principals in an LDAP structure. Well, I don't know whe

Re: Transport question

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Cameron Smith wrote: > Hello, > > When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error: > postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: "example.com" > > > example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7] > example.com smtps:[10.2.4.7] > > Wh

Re: Transport question

On 11/11/2009 2:53 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: Hello, When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error: postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: "example.com " example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7] example.com

Transport question

Hello, When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error: postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: "example.com" example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7] example.com smtps:[10.2.4.7] What is the correct syntax to have both? Thank you, Cameron

Re: access table problems

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > When I run these through postmap -q I a get a "REJECT" return. When I > add a fourth octect to the postmap -q input, I get nothing. I've been > beating me head on the desk whilst re-reading man 5 access, and I can't > figure out why real addresses matc

Re: ????: ????: who know how does initial_destination_concurrency and default_destination_concurrency_limit work?

> Ted Turner - > "Sports is like a war without the killing." > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 00:04, Victor Duchovni < > victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:30:47AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote: > > > > >

Re: ????: ????: who know how does initial_destination_concurrency and default_destination_concurrency_limit work?

Dear Sir, I have tried default concurrency =1 and initial concurrency =1. but both of them dont reduce the speed of delivering the emails. Can you please guide me with a way by which i can reduce the sending of emails to very slow.. Please help Rgds Dhiraj Ted Turner

Re: Local vs. relayed mail

Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > I'm currrently using Postfix on a pair of machines, one of which is a > smarthost for the other. If I do something like this on the internal > machine: > > mail -s Test nospam < /dev/null > > the mail is delivered locally, rather than through the smarthost. If I > manual

Re: ????: ????: who know how does initial_destination_concurrency and default_destination_concurrency_limit work?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:30:47AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote: > In your main.cf, set "default_destination_rate_delay = 1s" and > leave all those other parameters at their default. > > This will instruct postfix to send no more than 60 messages > per minute. This will apply to all transports, not j

Re: quick and dirty SASL

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Rick Zeman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Eero Volotinen >> wrote: >>> >>> Rick Zeman wrote: >>> > http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL Whoops...been so long since I set that up that I should ha

Local vs. relayed mail

I'm currrently using Postfix on a pair of machines, one of which is a smarthost for the other. If I do something like this on the internal machine: mail -s Test nospam < /dev/null the mail is delivered locally, rather than through the smarthost. If I manually append the domain, though: m

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:21:33AM +0330, Ali Majdzadeh wrote: > mech_list: gssapi plain > pwcheck_method: saslauthd > saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux > keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab > > and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using pam_krb5.so) > mechanisms. How is it possible to add c

Re: quick and dirty SASL

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:01:38 -0500 Rick Zeman replied: >I can't even do the ugly cyrus setup. saslpasswd2 segfaults on me. Obviously, you have something seriously bonked. Have you tried completely removing Cyrus-SASL2, or whatever version you have installed, from your system and then reinstalli

Re: How to reduce speed for certain domains

Dhiraj Chatpar: > Dear All, > > I need to know how to reduce the sending speed or put in a delay of like 2 > seconds before delivery to some of the domains. > > Namely yahoo, hotmail and a few others. > > Please help me and tell me how i can achieve this in postfix. http://www.postfix.org/QSHAP

Re: quick and dirty SASL

Rick Zeman wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Rick Zeman wrote: http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL Whoops...been so long since I set that up that I should have mentioned I have cyrus sasl installed. Maybe you can still use dovecot on different po

Re: Relaying problems

Hi, >> I'm still using postfix-1.x, > > Most people here would stop reading there and press/click delete (or > some might simply click 'Reply' and add the words 'upgrade'). > > So... UPGRADE. It is time. Thanks for hitting me with the well-deserved clue-bat. Advice well taken. Now, what if I sai

Re: quick and dirty SASL

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Rick Zeman wrote: > >>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL >> >> Whoops...been so long since I set that up that I should have mentioned >> I have cyrus sasl installed. > > Maybe you can still use dovecot on different port f

Re: quick and dirty SASL

Rick Zeman wrote: http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL Whoops...been so long since I set that up that I should have mentioned I have cyrus sasl installed. Maybe you can still use dovecot on different port for sasl? If not then you need the ugly cyrus setup? -- Eero

Re: quick and dirty SASL

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Rick Zeman wrote: >> >> Howdy, >> >> I have sasl installed and postfix uses it for its outbound relay just >> fine.  I need now for a smart phone or two to use postfix to send >> mail.  Am I correct that there's no mechanism like >> "smtp_s

Re: quick and dirty SASL

Rick Zeman wrote: Howdy, I have sasl installed and postfix uses it for its outbound relay just fine. I need now for a smart phone or two to use postfix to send mail. Am I correct that there's no mechanism like "smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_password" for smtpd? Just need a

Re: safe way to remove corrupt files.

Robert Lopez: > On one instance of an email gateway there are two files ... > [r...@mg05 log]# ls -l /var/spool/postfix/corrupt > total 4660 > -rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2183168 2009-08-30 21:06 2C9ED9BB* > -rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2588672 2009-10-02 06:46 939DD23CA* You can find the history

quick and dirty SASL

Howdy, I have sasl installed and postfix uses it for its outbound relay just fine. I need now for a smart phone or two to use postfix to send mail. Am I correct that there's no mechanism like "smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_password" for smtpd? Just need a quick and dirty one

How to reduce speed for certain domains

Dear All, I need to know how to reduce the sending speed or put in a delay of like 2 seconds before delivery to some of the domains. Namely yahoo, hotmail and a few others. Please help me and tell me how i can achieve this in postfix. Rgsd Dhiraj Stephen Leacock

Re: Test e-mailservice

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote: > Hi, > > Of course I don't want this to happen again in the future. How do people > test their mail server periodically? So far we use webmin which tries to > connect to port 25, 110 and 143 and checks if the greeting is correct. If > one

safe way to remove corrupt files.

On one instance of an email gateway there are two files ... [r...@mg05 log]# ls -l /var/spool/postfix/corrupt total 4660 -rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2183168 2009-08-30 21:06 2C9ED9BB* -rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2588672 2009-10-02 06:46 939DD23CA* The postcat of them show "unexpected EOF in data

Re: Blacklisted on Verizon

On 11/11/09 7:55 AM, "/dev/rob0" wrote: > "Senders by message count" is ENVELOPE SENDER, in the case of spam, > completely useless. If the OP has, as I might guess, a compromised > httpd + PHP script, for example, the envelope sender will probably > change for EACH spam it sends. /bin/ps ax -eost

Ldap virtual_alias_maps challenge

Greetings postfixers I have a address-rewriting issue that I cannot find a golden solution for in ldap (shortened for clairty) I have the following attributes: uid: abc123 mail: abc...@example.com alias: alias...@example.com forward: forward...@anotherexample.com keep: abc...@example.com when a

Re: Relaying problems

On 11/10/2009, Alex (mysqlstud...@gmail.com) wrote: > I'm still using postfix-1.x, Most people here would stop reading there and press/click delete (or some might simply click 'Reply' and add the words 'upgrade'). So... UPGRADE. It is time. > is there going to be significant configuration change

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

* Ali Majdzadeh : > Patrick, > Thanks for your reply. So if I have concluded correctly, the following > configuration is the one which should bring together gssapi, plain and > cram-md5 authentication mechanisms: It should. I have never done this myself. > pwcheck_method: saslauthd auxprop > mech

Re: Blacklisted on Verizon

On 11/11/09 7:55 AM, "/dev/rob0" wrote: > On Wednesday 11 November 2009 06:14:08 >dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: >> Quoting Stan Hoeppner : >>> You should be concentrating your focus on the "Senders by >>> message count" section. >> >> Wouldnt the logwatch from the server list top

Re: analyzing a large deferred queue

On 11/10/2009 11:15 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, The current discussion re. Verizon blacklisting has been very interesting in terms of log analysis suggestions. It leads me to ask what seems to be a related question re. a problem I've been having lately. Over the past couple of weeks I'v

Re: 答复: 答复: who know how does initial _destination_concurrency and default_destinati on_concurrency_limit work?

On 11/11/2009 12:34 AM, coofucoo zhang wrote: > Hi Noel: > I just want to control the sending speed of postfix. Because some of ISP > complain me that my speed is too fast. So I want to make postfix send a > little slowly. I am not sure how can I accomplish this target, so I set up a > test ENV to

Re: Blacklisted on Verizon

On Wednesday 11 November 2009 06:14:08 dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: > Quoting Stan Hoeppner : > > You should be concentrating your focus on the "Senders by > > message count" section. > > Wouldnt the logwatch from the server list top users by emails? Perhaps, but I missed the part w

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

Patrick, Thanks for your reply. So if I have concluded correctly, the following configuration is the one which should bring together gssapi, plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms: pwcheck_method: saslauthd auxprop mech_list: gssapi plain cram-md5 saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux keyta

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

* Ali Majdzadeh : > Patrick, > Hi > Thanks for your mail. I use the following options in smtpd.conf: > > mech_list: gssapi plain > pwcheck_method: saslauthd > saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux > keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab > > and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using pam_krb5.so) >

Re: Blacklisted on Verizon

Quoting Stan Hoeppner : Chris Arnold put forth on 11/10/2009 7:21 PM: Don't want to post the whole pflogsumm file as 1 it is very long and 2 there are somethings that don't need to be shared on a mailinglist :) What are some things I should be looking for in the pflogsumm.pl report? You shou

RE: Test e-mailservice

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:01 +0100, Peter Sørensen wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I will do that. I probably have to do a little bit of cleanup/docs before > I send it. Will do that in the next couple of days. Hope this is OK for > you. Sure that's fine with me. Thank you very much! > > Best regards

Re: newaliases problem with root user

Manoj Burande: > Hello Wietse, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Can you please guide me on how to use postfix "newaliases"?. I have Yes. Deinstall SENDMAIL. Wietse > already stopped sendmail on the server. And still it is using sendmail > newaliases". Can you please tell me how to

Re: Need help to configure postfix.

On 2009-11-11 Manoj Burande wrote: > I have to configure my postfix mail server in following way so plese > help me to accomplish the configuration. > > 1] Is it possible to configure my postfix mail server without a DNS >entry for mail.mydomain.com.? Yes. MX records tell the world which serv

RE: Test e-mailservice

Hi Martin, I will do that. I probably have to do a little bit of cleanup/docs before I send it. Will do that in the next couple of days. Hope this is OK for you. Best regards Peter -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org

RE: Test e-mailservice

Hi Peter, On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:08:34 +0100, Peter Sørensen wrote: > Hi, > > We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5 > minutes to > a specific mailbox on Our exchange system. This has a limit on 0 which > means that > it will bounce the mail back to the sender. >

Need help to configure postfix.

Hello There, I have to configure my postfix mail server in following way so plese help me to accomplish the configuration. 1] Is it possible to configure my postfix mail server without a DNS entry for mail.mydomain.com.? >> i] The reason behind it is that can only send mail. Mail server wil

Re: Test e-mailservice

2009/11/11 Martijn de Munnik : > remote host. Does anybody use a check which checks the complete mail loop? > I was thinking of sending a mail from a remote host (with webmin) to a test > mail account and see if I can download the mail with imap and then with pop > which removes the mail. The test

RE: Test e-mailservice

Hi, We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5 minutes to a specific mailbox on Our exchange system. This has a limit on 0 which means that it will bounce the mail back to the sender. We use this to document a baseline. When sending we generate a Uniq Message-id - sa

RE: Test e-mailservice

>-Original Message- >From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] >On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik >Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:54 AM >To: postfix-users@postfix.org >Subject: Test e-mailservice > >Does anybody have such a test setup? > >Thanks, >M

Test e-mailservice

Hi, Last night we had a issue with our mail server which went unnoticed till this morning. Our spam filter crashed and postfix couldn't feed mails for check to localhost:10024. The mails stayed in the queue till we noticed that we didn't received any mail this morning. I restarted the spam filter

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

Suomi, Thanks for your mail. I do not use LDAP, instead I use PAM and I want to have the following authentication mechanisms together: PLAIN (over PAM, pam_krb5.so and saslauthd) GSSAPI CRAM-MD5 Currently, two of these work fine together; plain and gssapi, but I am not able to get cram-md5 workin

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

Patrick, Hi Thanks for your mail. I use the following options in smtpd.conf: mech_list: gssapi plain pwcheck_method: saslauthd saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using pam_krb5.so) mechanisms. How is it possible to add

Re: A question about plain and cram-md5 authentication mechanisms

Hi Ali i had problems using login, plain, cram-md5 and digest-md5 (all toghether) through saslauthd. At this site, all mail parameters are in LDAP, so i had to tell saslauthd to get the authentication parameters from LDAP. For the tests, i had inserted the passwords in plaintext into LDAP. But