* Keith Palmer :
>
> OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question.
>
> >> Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using
> >> SASL/PAM?
>
> I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups.
>
> --
> - Keith Palmer
>ke...@academickeys.com
>ht
2009/10/30 Seth Mattinen :
> Keith Palmer wrote:
>> OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question.
>>
Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using
SASL/PAM?
>>
>> I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups.
>>
>
> Use the dovecot auth met
Rene Bartsch:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Rene Bartsch:
> >> Is there any reason why such lists are not in shared memory?
> >
> > You can use the proxymap service for that.
>
> How can I configure that?
>
> Setting "proxy:cidr:/path/to/file" throws
>
> Oct 30 00:33:19 www po
> Rene Bartsch:
>> Is there any reason why such lists are not in shared memory?
>
> You can use the proxymap service for that.
How can I configure that?
Setting "proxy:cidr:/path/to/file" throws
Oct 30 00:33:19 www postfix/proxymap[26942]: warning: request for unapproved
table:
"cidr:/etc/postf
* Marty Anstey :
> Hi all,
> I have a quick question which relates to how Postfix interacts with LDAs
> (in particular, Dovecot).
>
> I've asked this question over on the Dovecot list, but it sounds like
> the issue is with how Postfix handles the response from Dovecot's LDA.
>
> When Dovecot's L
Hi Marty,
Dovecot uses maildir++ mailboxes??. If so you could use my project :
Postfix quota reject. It works rejecting mail for overquota mailboxes
that are maildir++ or cyrus sort of mailbox. I have programmed it
thinking on ISP mail hosting services; allows you the possibility of
rejec
On 10/29/2009 3:49 PM, Marty Anstey wrote:
Hi all,
I have a quick question which relates to how Postfix interacts with LDAs
(in particular, Dovecot).
I've asked this question over on the Dovecot list, but it sounds like
the issue is with how Postfix handles the response from Dovecot's LDA.
When
Hi all,
I have a quick question which relates to how Postfix interacts with LDAs
(in particular, Dovecot).
I've asked this question over on the Dovecot list, but it sounds like
the issue is with how Postfix handles the response from Dovecot's LDA.
When Dovecot's LDA (deliver) gets handed a messag
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> That is a relief when I get to the new version.
>
> In the mean time I am still having trouble with the workaround. My config
> now says:
>
> smtpd_helo_restrictions =
> check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/heloaccept.cidr
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:54PM +0330, Ali Majdzadeh wrote:
> Thanks for your mail. Among your experiences with Postfix, GSSAPI and
> probably SASL, have you ever tested your configuration using telnet? If it
> is so, would you please describe the procedure? According to your previous
> mail, I
On 10/29/2009 12:51 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Russ Lavoy put forth on 10/29/2009 12:39 PM:
Hello,
I have a question...
I got a request that they want email coming from usera to userb to be BCC'ed to
userc.
I am not sure how to go about that I know how to direct email from a specific
user to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:45:00PM +0100, Rene Bartsch wrote:
> > Otherwise, run a test Postfix instance with a default configuration,
> > and add one feature at a time, until the memory footprint jumps...
>
> The memory usage is caused by
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_client_ac
That is a relief when I get to the new version.
In the mean time I am still having trouble with the workaround. My
config now says:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/heloaccept.cidr
That got rid of the dictionary error however it does not work as I
expec
Russ Lavoy put forth on 10/29/2009 12:39 PM:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question...
>
> I got a request that they want email coming from usera to userb to be BCC'ed
> to userc.
>
> I am not sure how to go about that I know how to direct email from a specific
> user to another specific user, but not
Hello,
I have a question...
I got a request that they want email coming from usera to userb to be BCC'ed to
userc.
I am not sure how to go about that I know how to direct email from a specific
user to another specific user, but not BCC based on the from and to matches.
Can anyone help me out
Rene Bartsch:
> Is there any reason why such lists are not in shared memory?
You can use the proxymap service for that.
> Is it normal that TLS bloats each smtpd-process by about 1 Mbyte?
Hah. If it were only one.
Wietse
On 10/29/2009 11:40 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Darek M wrote:
I'm unsure of what the typical procedure is on this, and didn't find
anything useful in a web search, but wouldn't it make sense to run SPF
on the header From as well? Is that something Postfix could be set to
do? What ab
On Thursday 29 October 2009 11:40:34 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Darek M wrote:
> > I'm unsure of what the typical procedure is on this, and didn't find
> > anything useful in a web search, but wouldn't it make sense to run SPF
> > on the header From as well? Is that something Postfix coul
Darek M wrote:
> I'm unsure of what the typical procedure is on this, and didn't find
> anything useful in a web search, but wouldn't it make sense to run SPF
> on the header From as well? Is that something Postfix could be set to
> do? What about triggering some action if the header and envelope
Rene Bartsch wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:10:27AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>
>> It looks like a "heap" to me. Some library is allocating a lot of virtual
>> memory. It could be via Postfix, or via an NSS module, perhaps "db"
>> entries in nsswitch.conf, just to close out the Berke
Keith Palmer wrote:
> OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question.
>
>>> Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using
>>> SASL/PAM?
>
> I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups.
>
Use the dovecot auth method. In spite of the name in the doc
I'm seeing fake Facebook spam that is sent from Gmail, with the
envelope From set to the Gmail hosted domain, and the header From set
to @facebookmail.com.
I'm using spamassassin and SPF, and the message is allowed through, as
the Gmail hosted fomain is in Gmail's SPF. But what the client sees
is
Viktor,
Hi
Thanks for your mail. Among your experiences with Postfix, GSSAPI and
probably SASL, have you ever tested your configuration using telnet? If it
is so, would you please describe the procedure? According to your previous
mail, I figured out that since I use telnet to test the configuratio
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Rene Bartsch:
r...@www:~# pmap 23976
pmap is a command that originates from Solaris, but that is also
available on Linux (except that the Linux version is very light
on documentation).
23976: smtpd -n :smtp -t inet -u -o stress
...
7f2936d45000 36K r-x-
Zitat von Keith Palmer :
OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question.
Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using
SASL/PAM?
I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups.
Postfix has no user management at its own. You have to use either
OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question.
>> Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using
>> SASL/PAM?
I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups.
--
- Keith Palmer
ke...@academickeys.com
http://www.AcademicKeys.com/
On Thu, Octob
* Keith Palmer :
>
> Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM?
>
> We're trying to keep things simple here, and I'd really rather prefer to
> just have Postfix do lookups in a text file or straight from the unix
> accounts for SMTP-AUTH.
Look into this:
# sasla
Rene Bartsch put forth on 10/29/2009 7:24 AM:
> It's a Linux-VServer with Ubuntu 9.04. The package is
> "postfix_2.5.5-1.1_amd64.deb". Additionally
> the "postfix-mysql" package is installed for domains and aliases.
It looks like something in your OS config is causing an additional ~2MB
to be al
Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM?
We're trying to keep things simple here, and I'd really rather prefer to
just have Postfix do lookups in a text file or straight from the unix
accounts for SMTP-AUTH.
Is it do-able?
--
- Keith Palmer
ke...@academic
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:10:27AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> It looks like a "heap" to me. Some library is allocating a lot of virtual
> memory. It could be via Postfix, or via an NSS module, perhaps "db"
> entries in nsswitch.conf, just to close out the Berkeley DB theme.
>
> Otherwi
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:26:54PM +0330, Ali Majdzadeh wrote:
> Thanks for your mail. Do you test the configuration using mail clients like
> Thunderbird or something like that? If not, what do you actually use in
> order to test the configuration?
I have successfully performed GSSAPI authentica
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:10:27AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> [...]
>> 7f293a37f000 4K r /lib/ld-2.9.so
>> 7f293a38 4K rw--- /lib/ld-2.9.so
>> 7f293a381000188K r-x-- /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd
>> 7f293a5af000 12K r /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd
>> 00
> Zitat von Rene Bartsch :
>
>>> Rene Bartsch:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND 7159 postfix 20 0
>> 79960 24m 3332 S 0 12.4 0:00.14 smtpd 7897 postfix 20
>> 0 79204 23m 2736 S
>> 0 11.7 0:00.10 smtpd
>>>
>>> Please repor
Rene Bartsch:
> r...@www:~# pmap 23976
pmap is a command that originates from Solaris, but that is also
available on Linux (except that the Linux version is very light
on documentation).
> 23976: smtpd -n :smtp -t inet -u -o stress
...
> 7f2936d45000 36K r-x-- /lib/libcrypt-2.9.so
> 00
Quoting ram :
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 08:45 +1100, Phillip Smith wrote:
2009/10/28 Dennis Putnam
Thanks or the reply. That sucks. Is there a way around this,
short of turning that off or whitelisting?
Tell the admin of the remote domain to fix their PTR records and/or MX
helo co
Viktor,
Hello
Thanks for your mail. Do you test the configuration using mail clients like
Thunderbird or something like that? If not, what do you actually use in
order to test the configuration?
Kind Regards
Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani
2009/10/28 Victor Duchovni
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:11:33PM
On 2009-10-29 Phillip Smith wrote:
>>> Tell the admin of the remote domain to fix their PTR records and/or
>>> MX helo configuration because in the meantime, you're going to have
>>> to implement a dirty hack to make their server work.
>>
>> But the PTR needs no "fix".
>>
>> The IP resolves to a ho
> > Tell the admin of the remote domain to fix their PTR records and/or MX
> > helo configuration because in the meantime, you're going to have to
> > implement a dirty hack to make their server work.
>
> But the PTR needs no "fix".
>
> The IP resolves to a hostname perfectly fine , only that the h
I suggest you use ldap for your transport and build a server farm to handle
the mail
k
- "ram" wrote:
> We need to design a mail system where postfix transport maps file
> will
> grow based on the inputs. . This may grow to a million lines
>
> I need to know what will be the max entrie
Zitat von Rene Bartsch :
Rene Bartsch:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND 7159 postfix 20 0
79960 24m 3332 S 0 12.4 0:00.14 smtpd 7897 postfix 20
0 79204 23m 2736 S
0 11.7 0:00.10 smtpd
Please report what portions of th
40 matches
Mail list logo
