2009/10/8 Wietse Venema
> This could easily be scripted and run from cron. Massage the output
> from host(1) or dig(1) to extract hosts, and use an expect script
> to do the talking, like http://www.cymru.com/Tools/mtaprobe.exp.
> The whole thing should not take more than a dozen or so lines.
I h
Phillip Smith:
> 2009/10/7 Wietse Venema :
> > Phillip Smith:
> >> Where is the best place to file a feature request? I can't find
> >> anything on the website, although I may be a little slow in that
> >> regard!
> >
> > Discuss it on the mailing list.
>
> Thanks for the reply Wietse, here goes :
2009/10/7 Wietse Venema :
> Phillip Smith:
>> Where is the best place to file a feature request? I can't find
>> anything on the website, although I may be a little slow in that
>> regard!
>
> Discuss it on the mailing list.
Thanks for the reply Wietse, here goes :)
I was wondering about the poss
This is useless here because recipient_bcc_maps are handled by
cleanup(8) and not smtpd(8). You need to use a different cleanup(8)
instance which overrides the default bcc maps setting for mail coming
through this special smtpd(8) listener.
Cool! So i wrote this, and working! Thank you!
smtps i
Owen Townsend a écrit :
> subject: newbie config main.cf to send mail thru router to internet
>
> Hope someone can help me with the postfix configuration file.
>
> I want to mail from Linux logged in user accounts to the internet
> and more importantly from Korn shell scripts to the internet.
>
On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
Hello!
In main.cf I am using a global blind carbon copy table:
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/global_bcc
I would like to ignore this table, when trusted user sends a mail so
i wrote this into master.cf:
smtps inet n -
Hello!
In main.cf I am using a global blind carbon copy table:
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/global_bcc
I would like to ignore this table, when trusted user sends a mail so i
wrote this into master.cf:
smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_wrap
Stan Hoeppner:
> Dave T?ht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM:
>
> > I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
>
> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and
> a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same architecture (same species) and
> base protocol, but use
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Dave T?ht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM:
>>
>> > I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
>>
>> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and
>> a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same arc
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> Dave Täht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM:
>
>> I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
>
> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and
> a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same architecture (same species) and
> base protocol, bu
Dave Täht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM:
> I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and
a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same architecture (same species) and
base protocol, but use different addressing. IPv6 a
On 10/7/2009, Stan Hoeppner (s...@hardwarefreak.com) wrote:
> If they're blocking outbound TCP 25 from his CPE, how is changing from a
> dotted decimal address in relayhost to an fqdn going to help? _It won't_.
Right, sorry, I read too quickly, I thought webfaction was his domain,
not his ISP...
Charles Marcus put forth on 10/7/2009 1:32 PM:
> You can fix this by setting relayhost = [smtp.myisp.com]
If they're blocking outbound TCP 25 from his CPE, how is changing from a
dotted decimal address in relayhost to an fqdn going to help? _It won't_.
What he's going to need to do is one (or m
Rich Shepard put forth on 10/7/2009 1:38 PM:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> Looking at my mail spool almost ALL mail is either 7bit, 8bit, or
>> quoted-printable.
>
> That's what I've seen here, too.
>
> Regardless, when I put those base64 messages on hold and looked at them
> thi
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, LuKreme wrote:
Looking at my mail spool almost ALL mail is either 7bit, 8bit, or
quoted-printable.
That's what I've seen here, too.
Regardless, when I put those base64 messages on hold and looked at them
this morning, none was base64 Content-Transfer-Encoded. I'm witho
On 10/7/2009, Owen Townsend (o...@uvsoftware.ca) wrote:
> In maillog1 I saw 'No route to host (port 25)'
> and thought my router firewall might be blocking,
> so I set my router to DMZ for my linux computer 192.168.0.4
> & ran test2 to create maillog2, but I still see 'No route to host (port 25)'
>
Neil Smith wrote:
I run Postfix to handle my personal mail. I also act as a backup MX host for
a friend.
To give him time to return from holiday and fix a broken Postfix installation,
I want to keep messages for the backup domains for up to 21 days. However, I
want undeliverable messages f
On 6-Oct-2009, at 15:02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
In real life almost ALL mails are base64 encoded...
Wait, what?
$ grep -ir "^Content-Transfer-Encoding" . | wc -l
198485
$ grep -ir "^Content-Transfer-Encoding" . | grep -v base64 | wc -l
195574
Looking at my mail spool almost ALL mail is eit
subject: newbie config main.cf to send mail thru router to internet
Hope someone can help me with the postfix configuration file.
I want to mail from Linux logged in user accounts to the internet
and more importantly from Korn shell scripts to the internet.
so scripts running by cron could emai
K bharathan:
> thanks Mr.Wietse for ur time
>
> details are logged into log files named - warn,mail.error,mail and mail.info;
> i checked all of these for this particular error but not available; only
> information related to the message from mail.info is as follows:
Postfix sends "queue file wri
thanks Mr.Wietse for ur time
details are logged into log files named - warn,mail.error,mail and mail.info;
i checked all of these for this particular error but not available; only
information related to the message from mail.info is as follows:
Oct 7 10:35:23 relay1 postfix/smtpd[827]: connect f
LuKreme wrote:
On 6-Oct-2009, at 09:37, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Your time in this regard
would be much better spent building a new supercharged 440 Hemi to drop
into a '70 Barracuda that you've redone from the frame rails up. ;)
That's a much more worthy use of your time.
Yeah, I have to agree, a
On 6-Oct-2009, at 09:37, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Your time in this regard
would be much better spent building a new supercharged 440 Hemi to
drop
into a '70 Barracuda that you've redone from the frame rails up. ;)
That's a much more worthy use of your time.
Yeah, I have to agree, and I didn't u
K bharathan:
> hi all
> i got a notice from my relay saying queue file write error; the details are
> as follows:
Postfix logs the details to syslogd. If your syslogging is spread out
across separate files for normal, warning and error, you will have to
look in all those files.
Wietse
hi all
i got a notice from my relay saying queue file write error; the details are
as follows:
-
From:mailer-dae...@relay1.example.com (Mail Delivery System)
To:postmas...@example.com(Postmaster)
Date:07/10/2009 11:44 AM
Subject:Postfix SMTP server: errors from na3sys009ao
Neil Smith wrote:
I run Postfix to handle my personal mail. I also act as a backup MX host for
a friend.
To give him time to return from holiday and fix a broken Postfix installation,
I want to keep messages for the backup domains for up to 21 days. However, I
want undeliverable messages f
I run Postfix to handle my personal mail. I also act as a backup MX host for
a friend.
To give him time to return from holiday and fix a broken Postfix installation,
I want to keep messages for the backup domains for up to 21 days. However, I
want undeliverable messages for other domains to
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> This is fixed with Postfix 2.3 patch 09, released April 2007.
Thanks
--
thorNET
Internet Services, Consultancy & Training
www.thornet.co.uk
Steve Heaven:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 06:41 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Steve Heaven:
> > >
> > > We have noticed several entries like:
> > >
> > > postfix/postdrop[5917]: warning: uid=0: Illegal seek
> > >
> > > in our logs. Is this anything we should be worried about?
> >
> > The crystal
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 06:41 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Steve Heaven:
> >
> > We have noticed several entries like:
> >
> > postfix/postdrop[5917]: warning: uid=0: Illegal seek
> >
> > in our logs. Is this anything we should be worried about?
>
> The crystal ball isn't working. What file sys
Phillip Smith:
> Where is the best place to file a feature request? I can't find
> anything on the website, although I may be a little slow in that
> regard!
Discuss it on the mailing list.
Wietse
Steve Heaven:
>
> We have noticed several entries like:
>
> postfix/postdrop[5917]: warning: uid=0: Illegal seek
>
> in our logs. Is this anything we should be worried about?
The crystal ball isn't working. What file system is this? What
Postfix version is this? What were you doing (submittin
32 matches
Mail list logo
