Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

2009/9/26 Erick Calder : > oh, I think i get it.  if server A is just relaying to server B, it will get > e/j...@arix.com and hand e+j...@arix.com to B.  I'm not sure I understand > how that would break the mail (since e+j...@arix.com) is valid and will > still be received.  of course, if B is conf

Re: Mixing relay_recipient_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: > I have a question about mixing virtual mailboxes and relay recipients. No, do not mix them. $relay_recipient_maps specifies valid addresses for $relay_domains; similarly, $virtual_mailbox_maps is for domains that match $virtual_mailbox_domains. > us

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/25/2009 9:37 PM: > Why does the address get de-configured? You should be able to bind > it provided the interface is administratively up, even if it is not > working. Ahh, that's the part I missed. Sounds like his flavor of *nix (and/or a driver) is automatically d

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

On 25-Sep-2009, at 20:35, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Provide 'postconf -d' output please. How is that going to help? from man postfconf: -d Print default parameter settings instead of actual settings. -- "Master, what is the difference between a humanistic, monastic system of

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:35:39PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Provide 'postconf -d' output please. Best to not provide answers when you are not more expert than the person asking the questions. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do n

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 02:43:35AM +0200, Sven Strickroth wrote: > Is it possible to tell postfix not to send mails if the > smtp_bind_address is not available? Not without source code changes: src/smtp/smtp_connect.c:smtp_connect_addr() ... if (bind(sock, res0->ai_addr, res0

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

Sven Strickroth put forth on 9/25/2009 8:49 PM: > Am 26.09.2009 03:40 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >>> Is it possible to tell postfix not to send mails if the >>> smtp_bind_address is not available? >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_bind_address > > You only pasted the docs here, but my pro

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

Am 26.09.2009 03:40 schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >> Is it possible to tell postfix not to send mails if the >> smtp_bind_address is not available? > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_bind_address You only pasted the docs here, but my problem isn't described there (or I don't get it). My sy

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

On Sep 25, 2009, at 15:30, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: What if one address matches more than one element in your delimiter set? Only match on the first delimited found, seems like the best idea. user.extension-word+...@example.com If the delimited is + then the extension is e

Re: use smtp_bind_address or defer

Sven Strickroth put forth on 9/25/2009 7:43 PM: > Hi, > > I've a server with multiple ip addresses (all dial-in). But only one > static ip-address. So if the static ip line is down postfix prints out > "warning: smtp_connect_addr: bind x.x.x.x: Cannot assign requested > address" and uses the other

Re: Virtual Aliases Usage and Syntax Question

On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:12, Charles Marcus wrote: On 9/24/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote: virtual_alias_maps = hash:$config_directory/virtual pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre, pcre:$config_directory/virtual_sql.pcre, proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_map

use smtp_bind_address or defer

Hi, I've a server with multiple ip addresses (all dial-in). But only one static ip-address. So if the static ip line is down postfix prints out "warning: smtp_connect_addr: bind x.x.x.x: Cannot assign requested address" and uses the other (dynamic) ip for sending. Is it possible to tell postfix n

Re: way to hide the error message reason?

Halassy Zolt??n: > Hello! > > We are maintaining a couple mail hosts (>100). It's fine, cause they > generate low e-mail traffic. Now we got some new domains, and we belive > the stress will be excessive, not just bots, but i fear hackers, ddos, > etc (but the ham would be still low). To preven

way to hide the error message reason?

Hello! We are maintaining a couple mail hosts (>100). It's fine, cause they generate low e-mail traffic. Now we got some new domains, and we belive the stress will be excessive, not just bots, but i fear hackers, ddos, etc (but the ham would be still low). To prevent risking the 100 other dom

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Erick Calder: On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's transit mail, among many things. I'm not sure I understand... perhaps we're speaking of 2 different things.

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

Erick Calder: > On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Erick Calder: > >> On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> > >>> Erick Calder: > >>> > this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that > feature but my only complaint is that many

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Erick Calder: On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Erick Calder: this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the + sign in an e-mail address...

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

Erick Calder: > On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Erick Calder: > > > >> this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that > >> feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the + > >> sign > >> in an e-mail address... is there a way to have

Re: Different users on same external relay host

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:38:30PM -0700, spacejam wrote: > > Hi, > I'm having trouble setting up the per sender relay feature of postfix. The > problem is that I have two different email users that have to relay through > the same external server. I have no clue how I could setup the > authentic

Re: Different users on same external relay host

On 9/25/2009 3:38 PM, spacejam wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble setting up the per sender relay feature of postfix. The problem is that I have two different email users that have to relay through the same external server. I have no clue how I could setup the authentication details for these users.

Different users on same external relay host

Hi, I'm having trouble setting up the per sender relay feature of postfix. The problem is that I have two different email users that have to relay through the same external server. I have no clue how I could setup the authentication details for these users. In sasl_passwd I have [smtp.example.tld

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Erick Calder: this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the + sign in an e-mail address... is there a way to have a character bag work as the delimiter?

Re: 2.6.5-1 syslog_name option in master.cf

AndrewLong: > slow unix - - n - 1 smtp >-o syslog_name=postfix-slow > > I know the transport is working as ps aux shows a postfix-slow for -n... but When the master.cf left-most field is "slow" then the "-n" option value is "slow" not "postfix-slow".

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

Erick Calder: > On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Patrick Ben Koetter: > >> Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a > >> standard > >> that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just > >> appear one > >> day and people adopted

Re: 2.6.5-1 syslog_name option in master.cf

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:55:58AM -0700, AndrewLong wrote: > > In a previous thread... > > > Then I have to ask, what effect does the "-o syslog_name=postfix-slow" > > have in master.cf? > > It works with Postfix ~2.5 and later. (Viktor) > > However, after upgrade to 2.6.5-1, I still see no e

2.6.5-1 syslog_name option in master.cf

In a previous thread... > Then I have to ask, what effect does the "-o syslog_name=postfix-slow" > have in master.cf? It works with Postfix ~2.5 and later. (Viktor) However, after upgrade to 2.6.5-1, I still see no evidence that the option is doing anything. slow unix - - n

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Patrick Ben Koetter: Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one day and people adopted it without a spec or anything. Anybody know

Re: Block mails sent to particular recipient (postdrop)

Marcin Hlybin: > Hello, > > I would like to block emails to particular recipient. > check_recipient_access map works fine for emails sent through SMTP but > it doesn't seem to work when sending email locally e.g. using command: > $ echo | mail -s TEST u...@domain.com None of the smtpd_mumble feat

Block mails sent to particular recipient (postdrop)

Hello, I would like to block emails to particular recipient. check_recipient_access map works fine for emails sent through SMTP but it doesn't seem to work when sending email locally e.g. using command: $ echo | mail -s TEST u...@domain.com I figured out workaround: 1. create alias in alias map f

Re: Receiving mail for *...@domain.com

Thanks for your help, this solved my problem. James On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: But I don't seem to be getting it right, can anyone explain how I receive email for anyaddr...@domain.se without the server bouncing the email. http://www.post

Re: Receiving mail for *...@domain.com

But I don't seem to be getting it right, can anyone explain how I receive email for anyaddr...@domain.se without the server bouncing the email. http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html # Uncomment entry below to implement a catch-all address 10 # @example.com jim Thanks, -- Ee

Receiving mail for *...@domain.com

Hi, I have been reading documentation on this issue and it still seems I can't get it right. I'm building a Postfix server for testing. We need to test the impact of sending 100K emails, and I have setup this postfix server to receive the 100K emails. [r...@mx3 etc]# cat /etc/postfix/main.cf my

Mixing relay_recipient_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps

Hi Everyone, I have a question about mixing virtual mailboxes and relay recipients. I am faced with the following situation. us...@domain.tld is delivered to a virtual mailbox us...@domain.tld is relayed to another host Currently I'm doing this by listing the domain in virtual_mailbox_domains, l

majordomo troubles

There are some problems with one Cloud9 majordomo server as the result of some software upgrades. I thought all the missing files were put back yesterday. Meanwhile, if mail bounces, just resend it until it hits one of the other servers... Wietse

Re: Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

Patrick Ben Koetter: > Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard > that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one > day and people adopted it without a spec or anything. > > Anybody knows? As far as I know, the basic email RFCs have

Re: Virtual Aliases Usage and Syntax Question

On 9/24/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote: > virtual_alias_maps = > hash:$config_directory/virtual > pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre, > pcre:$config_directory/virtual_sql.pcre, > proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf > > The first line is local users,

Semi-OT: recipient delimiter spec/std?

Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one day and people adopted it without a spec or anything. Anybody knows? p...@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatical

Re: content_filter and relay_domains/transport_maps

Martijn de Munnik: > > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 07:38 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Martijn de Munnik: > > > Hi, > > > > > > It seems that e-mails which are relayed to other servers (using > > > relay_domains and transport_maps) don't go through content_filter. How > > > can I make sure that all m

Re: content_filter and relay_domains/transport_maps

On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 07:38 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Martijn de Munnik: > > Hi, > > > > It seems that e-mails which are relayed to other servers (using > > relay_domains and transport_maps) don't go through content_filter. How > > can I make sure that all mails go through the content_filter?

Re: content_filter and relay_domains/transport_maps

Martijn de Munnik: > Hi, > > It seems that e-mails which are relayed to other servers (using > relay_domains and transport_maps) don't go through content_filter. How > can I make sure that all mails go through the content_filter? You need to implement one of the models described in FILTER_README.

Re: Please reply to my email......

* Arora, Sumit : > Can anybody answer my question... Programming email message is not a Postfix topic. You will probably get help at a javamail related mailing list. p...@rick > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@

Please reply to my email......

Can anybody answer my question... Thanks -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Arora, Sumit Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:09 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: How to convert message received on post

content_filter and relay_domains/transport_maps

Hi, It seems that e-mails which are relayed to other servers (using relay_domains and transport_maps) don't go through content_filter. How can I make sure that all mails go through the content_filter? thanks, Martijn address_verify_map = btree:${data_directory}/verify alias_maps = hash:/opt/csw/

Re: postfix logging feature

On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote: Victor Duchovni wrote: Postfix is not Psychic. Have you tried postfix —psychic? $ postfix --psychic postfix: error: to submit mail, use the Postfix sendmail command postfix: fatal: the postfix --psychic command is reserved for the superdu