Re: (OT!) Clearing Spam Folders

Michael Orlitzky wrote: Justin C. Le Grice wrote: Barney Desmond wrote: 2009/8/24 Justin C. Le Grice : Ideally, the script would find all subdirectories of /var/vmail containing the string "Maildir/.Spam/" and then delete the messages in those directories which are older than 365 days. B

Re: (OT!) Clearing Spam Folders

Justin C. Le Grice wrote: Barney Desmond wrote: 2009/8/24 Justin C. Le Grice : I am new to the world of postfix. I have managed to successfully implement Postfix etc using workaround.org's excellent guide. My current item on the wish list is how to sweep items from the users Spam folders af

Re: (OT!) Clearing Spam Folders

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Justin C. Le Grice wrote: > Barney Desmond wrote: [...] >>> and how do I use it in a weekly cron >>> job? >>> >> >> Put it in a weekly cronjob. >> >> I don't mean to come off as rude, but these aren't really good >> questions, relevant or otherwise. >> > Gee Barney t

Re: (OT!) Clearing Spam Folders

Barney Desmond wrote: 2009/8/24 Justin C. Le Grice : I am new to the world of postfix. I have managed to successfully implement Postfix etc using workaround.org's excellent guide. My current item on the wish list is how to sweep items from the users Spam folders after a defined number of day

Re: unknown identities

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Oscar m Cruz wrote: > as soon as possible i need to block all kind of messages coming from an > unkown account inside my server, its mean something as taking some unknown > identities from my domain > > for instance: unknownacco...@mydomain.com -> to m...@mydomain.comhapp

unknown identities

Hi list as soon as possible i need to block all kind of messages coming from an unkown account inside my server, its mean something as taking some unknown identities from my domain for instance: unknownacco...@mydomain.com -> to m...@mydomain.comhapping with most of the mail account here the

Re: Block email based on recipient address

Gejo Paul a écrit : > Hi, > > My postfix version is postfix-2.3.3-2 > main.cf > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access ldap:ldapcond, don't do this. don't use a check_sender_access before reject_unauth_destination. put this check under smtpd_sender_restrictions instea

Re: Blocking mail "from me to me"

LuKreme a écrit : > On 24-Aug-2009, at 08:28, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: >> The one bit of spam I'd like to stop, and I seem to remember seeing >> talk of it at some point (but I've been unable to find it again) is >> the spam appears to be "from me to me." That is, the spammers who use >> my email

Settings for restrictive mail server

I need some ideas for implementing this uber-restrictive mailserver at my company. Some background: CEO doesn't want to buy Exchange. We have basically 3 user groups: agents, their team leads, and corporate (execs, etc). The goal is: Execs don't want agents to e-mail each other or anyone outside

Re: issues with postfix-ldap

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:55:43PM -0700, Daniel Corbe wrote: > acceptdomains_server_host = localhost > acceptdomains_server_port = 389 > acceptdomains_bind = yes > acceptdomains_bind_dn = cn=Manager,dc=corbe,dc=net > acceptdomains_bind_pw = xx55ZZ > acceptdomains_search_base = dc=corbe,dc=net > a

Re: log check_client_access

On Aug 24, 2009, at 8:31 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote: On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:57 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Monday 24 August 2009 12:43:16 Martijn de Munnik wrote: How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access rule matches? See the WARN result. If you mean that you want to log

Re: Maximum lines for relay_recipient_maps

Jonah Simandjuntak wrote: Hello, I've searched the available archives regarding the subject line above and couldn't find an answer. Is there a maximum line that the relay_recipient_maps (or in my case inside the relay_recipients file) can contain? Here is the line: relay_recipient_maps = dbm

Re: Blocking mail "from me to me" (was: Country IP block list)

On 24-Aug-2009, at 08:28, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: The one bit of spam I'd like to stop, and I seem to remember seeing talk of it at some point (but I've been unable to find it again) is the spam appears to be "from me to me." That is, the spammers who use my email address as the from addr

Maximum lines for relay_recipient_maps

Hello, I've searched the available archives regarding the subject line above and couldn't find an answer. Is there a maximum line that the relay_recipient_maps (or in my case inside the relay_recipients file) can contain? Here is the line: relay_recipient_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/domain/relay_r

Re: log check_client_access

On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:57 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Monday 24 August 2009 12:43:16 Martijn de Munnik wrote: How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access rule matches? See the WARN result. If you mean that you want to log and to trigger some other action, do note that REJECT an

Re: Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

Julien Vehent wrote: Wietse Venema wrote: Noel Jones: -- Aug 22 07:52:12 zerhuel postfix/smtpd[2109]: initializing the server-side TLS engine This is logged ONCE when a postfix/smtpd process starts up. Then, it handles one or more SMTP clients. So, 'initializing the server-side TLS

Re: issues with postfix-ldap

Issues with the depreciated config aside I figured out what the issue was. Burried deep inside the ldap_table(5) man page was my answer: for whatever reason postfix defaults to LDAPv2 instead of LDAPv3. The configuration examples with the newer versions of OpenLDAP try to gently discourage use

Re: log check_client_access

On Monday 24 August 2009 12:43:16 Martijn de Munnik wrote: > How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access > rule matches? See the WARN result. If you mean that you want to log and to trigger some other action, do note that REJECT and DEFER results are logged anyway. If you're wan

Re: Reg:Virtual Aliases forwarding

Thanks for reply, Benny. Just to better explain my problem: Assume, all domains in example : d1.com, d2.com and d3.com have SPF record setup to Pass. I have virtual_alias setup like this: "u...@d2.com > u...@d3.com". When I send email from u...@d1.com to u...@d2.com. It passes SPF with this m

log check_client_access

Hi, How can I write a message to syslog when a check_client_access rule matches? thanks, Martijn

Re: Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

Wietse Venema wrote: Noel Jones: -- Aug 22 07:52:12 zerhuel postfix/smtpd[2109]: initializing the server-side TLS engine This is logged ONCE when a postfix/smtpd process starts up. Then, it handles one or more SMTP clients. So, 'initializing the server-side TLS engine' is logged only b

Re: Mail Box

On Mon 24 Aug 2009 05:53:38 PM CEST, Mihira Fernando wrote How does roundcube compare with exchange outlook web access? As a webmail client, its pretty good. Follows some traits as the Gmail web interface. However it does not have all the bells and whistles Exchange has. exchange have not siev

Re: Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

Noel Jones: > > -- > > Aug 22 07:52:12 zerhuel postfix/smtpd[2109]: initializing the server-side > > TLS engine This is logged ONCE when a postfix/smtpd process starts up. Then, it handles one or more SMTP clients. So, 'initializing the server-side TLS engine' is logged only before the FIRST

Re: Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

Julien Vehent wrote: That message does not indicate a TLS connection. Try using smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 for a clear indication of when TLS is in use without the noise. -- Noel Jones OK, I did. I will look more closely at the logs to check that again. But, what does this message indicates i

Re: issues with postfix-ldap

On 8/24/2009, Brian Evans - Postfix List (grkni...@scent-team.com) wrote: > You are using the depreciated form of an LDAP lookup. Pet-peeve: The word is 'deprecated', not 'depreciated'... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:33:31 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > On 8/24/2009 9:51 AM, Julien Vehent wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> This is my first email on the list, so I hope it doesn't break any rule >> :) >> >> I've been playing around with my postfix logs to evaluate the percentage >> of MTA that are us

Re: Mail Box

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:28:20 -0400 Roman Gelfand wrote: > How does roundcube compare with exchange outlook web access? As a webmail client, its pretty good. Follows some traits as the Gmail web interface. However it does not have all the bells and whistles Exchange has.

Re: Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

On 8/24/2009 9:51 AM, Julien Vehent wrote: Hello guys, This is my first email on the list, so I hope it doesn't break any rule :) I've been playing around with my postfix logs to evaluate the percentage of MTA that are using STARTTLS when sending me emails. The result is pretty interesting, be

Re: Mail Box

How does roundcube compare with exchange outlook web access?

Non deterministic usage of STARTTLS

Hello guys, This is my first email on the list, so I hope it doesn't break any rule :) I've been playing around with my postfix logs to evaluate the percentage of MTA that are using STARTTLS when sending me emails. The result is pretty interesting, because some MTA are using TLS, but not all the

Re: Blocking mail "from me to me" (was: Country IP block list)

> Most of this spam is also blocked using spamhaus. Also you could add SPF > to your own domain so no other servers could send mail using your > domain. > http://www.openspf.org/Introduction Off course your server should check the SPF records for incoming mail.

Re: Blocking mail "from me to me" (was: Country IP block list)

On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 10:28 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: > On Aug 24, 2009, at 10:10, Mikael Bak wrote: > > Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: > >> > >> The spam I see pretty much all originates in China & Brazil, with > >> some > >> originating in Korea & US. It also pretty much all originates on >

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

Mark Martinec writes: > On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote: >> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to >> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback >> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host. > > My choice is to have the first MX

Blocking mail "from me to me" (was: Country IP block list)

On Aug 24, 2009, at 10:10, Mikael Bak wrote: Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: The spam I see pretty much all originates in China & Brazil, with some originating in Korea & US. It also pretty much all originates on dynamic IP addresses, so if there's a way to block email from dynamic address ranges

Re: Country IP block list

Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: > > The spam I see pretty much all originates in China & Brazil, with some > originating in Korea & US. It also pretty much all originates on > dynamic IP addresses, so if there's a way to block email from dynamic > address ranges, I would very much be interested in that

Re: Clearing Spam Folders

2009/8/24 Justin C. Le Grice : > I am new to the world of postfix. I have managed to successfully implement > Postfix etc using workaround.org's excellent guide. > > My current item on the wish list is how to sweep items from the users Spam > folders after a defined number of days. This is the Pos

Re: issues with postfix-ldap

Daniel Corbe wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing the following errors in my syslog being generated by > trivial-rewrite after a MAIL FROM: command hits my MTA. I've been trying to > enable LDAP lookups for my mail system without much success. The error > messages aren't very helpful (even with verbose

Re: Country IP block list

On Aug 23, 2009, at 22:26, Olivier Nicole wrote: Hi, Could someone provide links to sites where IP addresses are grouped by coun= try? ASNs would work too but would prefer IP lists that I could put in a f= ile that my postfix mail gateway could read. Obvious countries like China = and B

Re: Mail Box

Hi, Roman Gelfand wrote: > Can somebody recommend a mail box server software that would be worthy > of postfix? > dovecot > Also, if anyone knows of a cool web client. > roundcube

Re: Mail Box

* Roman Gelfand : > Can somebody recommend a mail box server software that would be worthy > of postfix? Dovecot > Also, if anyone knows of a cool web client. Horde Squirrelmail roundcube -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Ca

Mail Box

Can somebody recommend a mail box server software that would be worthy of postfix? Also, if anyone knows of a cool web client. Thanks in advance

Block email based on recipient address

Hi, My postfix version is postfix-2.3.3-2 main.cf smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access ldap:ldapcond, permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject smtpd_restriction_classes=default default = check_recipient_access ha

Clearing Spam Folders

Hi there. I am new to the world of postfix. I have managed to successfully implement Postfix etc using workaround.org's excellent guide. My current item on the wish list is how to sweep items from the users Spam folders after a defined number of days. I have located this script from http://

Re: Any C api to access Postfix programmatically?

I came to this solution, a bash script to validate a local recipient employing the SMTP protocol. #!/bin/bash nc localhost 25 << EOF | grep '250 2.1.5 Ok' | sed 's/250 2.1.5 Ok/OK/' HELO localhost MAIL FROM: RCPT TO: <$1> QUIT EOF Dimitrios O/H Wietse Venema έγραψε: ? ?

Re: DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Schwalbe, Oliver wrote: Helo Newsgroup, i will integrate an DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist to avoid SPAM. So i insert a new row in my main.cf main.cf before: [snip] main.cf after: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,

Re: DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist

* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Schwalbe, Oliver : > > > reject_rbl_client > > zen.spamhouse.org, <-- new Row inserted > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org > > > <<< 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [64.12.206.41] blocked using > > zen.s

Re: DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist

* Schwalbe, Oliver : > reject_rbl_client > zen.spamhouse.org, <-- new Row inserted reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org > <<< 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [64.12.206.41] blocked using > zen.spamhouse.org; This is not the DNSBL you

Re: DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist

Schwalbe, Oliver wrote: Helo Newsgroup, i will integrate an DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist to avoid SPAM. So i insert a new row in my main.cf main.cf before: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname,

DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist

Helo Newsgroup, i will integrate an DNSBL/RBL-Blacklist to avoid SPAM. So i insert a new row in my main.cf main.cf before: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname,

Re: deflecting attacks

Zitat von AMP Admin : Does anyone use iptables or something to defend against attacks? Like if x amount of requests per x amount of time send away. If so I would love some examples. Thanks! We use the following : $IPTABLES -N SMTP-BLOCK $IPTABLES -A SMTP-BLOCK -m limit --limit 1/m --limit