Noel Jones schrieb:
> Joerg Thuemmler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> im using postfix as mta for automatic mail sending out of our db. All db
>> users a logged in as the same (linux) user, as it's a terminal based
>> system. So a created mail has usually @domain.tld from and
>> return-path headers. Of course
Im having problems with the mail file being produced
when I setup procmail + postfix:
Ive setup global procmail with the following in
my master.cf file:
procmail unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRX user=jeff argv=/usr/bin/procmail -t -o SENDER=${sender} -m
user=${us..
Hi guys,
I'm wondering is there any way to configure postfix, to check content of
messages which contains ... let say more than 10 recipients, scan those
and check contents in looking for un.sub.scribe link (or particular words)
and if found pass messages if not block with notification for the se
Hi,
> I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
> people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously not
> as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
> stability. Any thoughts, recommendations or experiences would be
> appreciated.
I
On 8/17/09 12:43 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
I looked at the various rejections for the last 31 days, and I noticed
that my unknown/HELO is very very high and my RBL is very very low.
5xx Reject relay denied 0.08%
5xx Reject HELO/EHLO 45.97%
5xx Reject DATA 0.01%
5xx Reject unkno
Kurt Buff wrote:
I am biased, but I've long preferred FreeBSD to any flavor of Linux
for ease of administration - FreeBSD simply makes more sense to me
than any Linux I've ever touched. Others will differ, but that's my
preference.
I prefer linux, and currently use suse and ubuntu, which ha
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Guy wrote:
I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously not
as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
stability. Any tho
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:01, Guy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Postfix 2.5.5 with Amavis/CLAM. Also looking at adding
> SpamAssassin in the near future. I've also got Postfix Policyd V2 on
> my gateways.
> I've currently got this all running on Ubuntu (Hardy 8.04) and it's
> been fine so far.
> I ha
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Guy wrote:
> I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
> people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously not
> as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
> stability. Any thoughts, recommendations or experiences
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Eduardo Júnior:
>> Hi,
>>
>> where can I read about this?
>> How can I change the format and what each part means?
>
> You can configure the text (see: man 5 bounce) before the
> non-deliverable recipients, but you cannot configure the f
Wietse Venema wrote:
It's unprodictive to kill off Postfix under overload. At the very
least you should increase your 35-second deadline.
Yes I did increase it to 120 seconds. I understand just killing and
restarting postfix is not a solution.
As a test I switched the monitor to sending an a
ZhenDong,Xu a écrit :
> I have installed postfix 2.6 + cyrus-sasl2 + maildrop2.1.0 + mysql5.0.83
> + apache22 + extmail1.1.0
> When i send mail to myself,i can't received.and become the maillog.
> I send mail to gmail.com, Gmail can received.
>
> I have no idea about the log ,someone can help me
2009/8/18 Evan Platt :
> At 10:30 AM 8/17/2009, you wrote:
>> I just make the test and the performance was not good. Outgoing 1K email
>> was around 568 seconds.
>>
>> Any insight is appreciated.
>
> Although this will likely be out of my area of being able to help you,
> someone else here probably
LuKreme wrote:
I looked at the various rejections for the last 31 days, and I noticed
that my unknown/HELO is very very high and my RBL is very very low.
5xx Reject relay denied 0.08%
5xx Reject HELO/EHLO45.97%
5xx Reject DATA
2009/8/17 Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés :
> I'm running Postfix 2.3.8 in a Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (Etch) box. I want
> it to support LDAP but I don't know what would happen if I install the
> postfix-ldap package via apt-get because of this:
>
> # apt-get install --just-print postfix-ldap
> Reading package
Eduardo J?nior:
> Hi,
>
> where can I read about this?
> How can I change the format and what each part means?
You can configure the text (see: man 5 bounce) before the
non-deliverable recipients, but you cannot configure the format of
bounce messages. The format is defined in Internet RFC docum
2009/8/17 ZhenDong,Xu :
> I have installed postfix 2.6 + cyrus-sasl2 + maildrop2.1.0 + mysql5.0.83 +
> apache22 + extmail1.1.0
> When i send mail to myself,i can't received.and become the maillog.
> I send mail to gmail.com, Gmail can received.
>
> I have no idea about the log ,someone can help me
Stefan Varga wrote:
Hi,
I would like to tag/replace each message Subject: with some custom
pattern and leave the rest unchanged.
I'm using following header_checks rule:
/^Subject:.*/ REPLACE Subject: PRE $1
but I get a warning:
Aug 17 19:03:57 mail postfix/cleanup[20807]: [ID 947731 mail.warn
Hi,
I would like to tag/replace each message Subject: with some custom pattern and
leave the rest unchanged.
I'm using following header_checks rule:
/^Subject:.*/ REPLACE Subject: PRE $1
but I get a warning:
Aug 17 19:03:57 mail postfix/cleanup[20807]: [ID 947731 mail.warning] warning:
regexp m
Hi,
where can I read about this?
How can I change the format and what each part means?
In specially, i would like the body of the message sent would come with
the notification and the enconding format.
I read about daemon bounce in [1], but it's yet not clear for
me and hadn't the information
Marcelo Terres:
> Well, let me change the subject a little:
>
> Anybody can indicate me a policy daemon or some solution to reject messages
> for over quota at smtp time ?
I suggest: maintain an SMTPD access map that rejects mail for users
that are over quota; update this access map a few times a
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 5:56 AM, mouss wrote:
> Eduardo Júnior a écrit :
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>>> No, so you need to craft a more precise expression. The look of the
>>> Received: header you want to remove is very well-known, so it should
>>> be quite easy to
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Reinaldo de
Carvalho wrote:
> 2009/8/14 Eduardo Júnior :
>>
>> ok, but there is another way to do what I want.
>> The example above was a test.
>> Accepting some headers and denying the rest is an alternative:
>>
>> /^((Resent-)?From|To|Cc|Date|Reply-to|Reply-
Well, let me change the subject a little:
Anybody can indicate me a policy daemon or some solution to reject messages
for over quota at smtp time ?
This way I don't need to bounce the message like I want to do.
Thanks.
Regards,
Marcelo H. Terres
mhter...@gmail.com
Richard Wurman wrote:
I support a couple postfix servers that do a high volume of sending
mail (not "direct marketing" :) for billing, invoicing and account
update confirmations). On one machine, when the mailq is over 5000,
things seem to get "stuck" where I need to restart postfix. If I
don't,
Eugene Vilensky wrote:
According to your problem report, the trading application sends:
MAIL FROM:''
The correct SMTP protocol syntax is:
MAIL FROM:
Not even Sendmail accepts the incorrect syntax.
You can easily view the command by logging the SMTP commands (main.cf:
debug_peer_list =
--On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:06 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
There wasn't a /dev/*random when Postfix was initially ported to
MacOSX, and no-one has told me when /dev/*random were added.
Perhaps you can provide "uname -s" and "uname -r".
Have you verified that these work? Unfortunately ex
At 10:30 AM 8/17/2009, you wrote:
All,
What do I need to do in order to have better performance on Postfix.
I have Centos5 with postfix installed. The mail server is only as a
relay mail server and has nothing else.
I just make the test and the performance was not good. Outgoing 1K
email was
All,
What do I need to do in order to have better performance on Postfix.
I have Centos5 with postfix installed. The mail server is only as a relay mail
server and has nothing else.
I just make the test and the performance was not good. Outgoing 1K email was
around 568 seconds.
Any insight is
I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously
not
as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
stability. Any thoughts, recommendations or experiences would be
appreciated.
As you still
Zitat von Richard Wurman :
I support a couple postfix servers that do a high volume of sending
mail (not "direct marketing" :) for billing, invoicing and account
update confirmations). On one machine, when the mailq is over 5000,
things seem to get "stuck" where I need to restart postfix. If I
d
> According to your problem report, the trading application sends:
>
> MAIL FROM:''
>
> The correct SMTP protocol syntax is:
>
> MAIL FROM:
>
> Not even Sendmail accepts the incorrect syntax.
>
> You can easily view the command by logging the SMTP commands (main.cf:
> debug_peer_list = addres
On 17/08/2009 17:01, Guy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.5.5 with Amavis/CLAM. Also looking at adding
SpamAssassin in the near future. I've also got Postfix Policyd V2 on
my gateways.
I've currently got this all running on Ubuntu (Hardy 8.04) and it's
been fine so far.
I have had one or two probl
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.5.5 with Amavis/CLAM. Also looking at adding
SpamAssassin in the near future. I've also got Postfix Policyd V2 on
my gateways.
I've currently got this all running on Ubuntu (Hardy 8.04) and it's
been fine so far.
I have had one or two problems along the way, not with Postfi
* Richard Wurman :
> I support a couple postfix servers that do a high volume of sending
> mail (not "direct marketing" :) for billing, invoicing and account
> update confirmations). On one machine, when the mailq is over 5000,
> things seem to get "stuck" where I need to restart postfix. If I
> do
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sometimes our mail server is 'under attack' and we get a lot of these
> entries in our log file:
>
> Aug 17 11:08:19 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/smtpd[14890]: [ID 197553
> mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[212.22.199.165]: 450 4.1.8
> : Sender addr
I support a couple postfix servers that do a high volume of sending
mail (not "direct marketing" :) for billing, invoicing and account
update confirmations). On one machine, when the mailq is over 5000,
things seem to get "stuck" where I need to restart postfix. If I
don't, mail will pile up in the
Joerg Thuemmler wrote:
Hi,
im using postfix as mta for automatic mail sending out of our db. All db
users a logged in as the same (linux) user, as it's a terminal based
system. So a created mail has usually @domain.tld from and
return-path headers. Of course that's not what I want, every db user
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:02:34 +0200, oka...@gmail.com wrote:
For example we have all-t...@test.com and we want to only allow
one-u...@test.com to send an email to all-t...@test.com, others can't
send to this email address.
http://www.postfwd.org/ and http://www.policyd.or
For those who missed it, the dkim-milter project forked.
Its principal developer is now with the OpenDKIM project.
The OpenDKIM v1.0.0 brings a couple of bug fixes over
the dkim-milter, and uses a new build mechanism.
Mark
Here is the announcement posted on 2009-08-14:
==
The OpenDKIM proj
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:39:39 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>reject_unverified_recipient,
>reject_unauth_destination,
is a unverified recipient a auth destination ? :)
--
Benny Pedersen
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:02:34 +0200, oka...@gmail.com wrote:
> For example we have all-t...@test.com and we want to only allow
> one-u...@test.com to send an email to all-t...@test.com, others can't
> send to this email address.
http://www.postfwd.org/ and http://www.policyd.org/ can both do this
* Martijn de Munnik :
> > I'd put them all into smtpd_recipient_restrictions #:)
>
> I did some updates in my main.cf. I've attached the updated file. I kept
> the restrictions with the different smtpd_*_restrictions, I find it a
> little easier to understand.
Thus your initial question :)
(pard
I'm running Postfix 2.3.8 in a Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (Etch) box. I want
it to support LDAP but I don't know what would happen if I install the
postfix-ldap package via apt-get because of this:
# apt-get install --just-print postfix-ldap
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn de Munnik :
>
> > > Do you have a caching DNS server?
> >
> > Yes, but still things can go wrong and I don't want a failing DNS lookup
> > to be fatal.
>
> Postfix always returns a 4xx in case of such failures
>
> > As far
* Martijn de Munnik :
> > I'd put them all into smtpd_recipient_restrictions #:)
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger
Doesn't apply for your restrictions
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjami
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Martijn de Munnik :
> >
> > > > Do you have a caching DNS server?
> > >
> > > Yes, but still things can go wrong and I don't want a failing DNS lookup
> > > to be fatal.
> >
> > Post
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn de Munnik :
>
> > > Do you have a caching DNS server?
> >
> > Yes, but still things can go wrong and I don't want a failing DNS lookup
> > to be fatal.
>
> Postfix always returns a 4xx in case of such failures
>
> > As far
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:28 PM, wrote:
> thanks, that is what i'm looking for.
>
> BR
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> oka...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Is there any method to discard all mails coming to t...@test.com
>>> except all mails coming from *...
* Martijn de Munnik :
> > Do you have a caching DNS server?
>
> Yes, but still things can go wrong and I don't want a failing DNS lookup
> to be fatal.
Postfix always returns a 4xx in case of such failures
> As far as I know it does. But I see it is also included in
> xbl.spamhaus.org.
Rather
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 11:28 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn de Munnik :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sometimes our mail server is 'under attack' and we get a lot of these
> > entries in our log file:
> >
> > Aug 17 11:08:19 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/smtpd[14890]: [ID 197553
> > mail.info] NO
Martijn de Munnik schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> Sometimes our mail server is 'under attack' and we get a lot of these
> entries in our log file:
>
> Aug 17 11:08:19 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/smtpd[14890]: [ID 197553
> mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[212.22.199.165]: 450 4.1.8
> : Sender
ZhenDong,Xu schrieb:
> I have installed postfix 2.6 + cyrus-sasl2 + maildrop2.1.0 + mysql5.0.83
> + apache22 + extmail1.1.0
> When i send mail to myself,i can't received.and become the maillog.
> I send mail to gmail.com, Gmail can received.
>
> I have no idea about the log ,someone can help me
* Martijn de Munnik :
> Hi all,
>
> Sometimes our mail server is 'under attack' and we get a lot of these
> entries in our log file:
>
> Aug 17 11:08:19 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/smtpd[14890]: [ID 197553
> mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[212.22.199.165]: 450 4.1.8
> : Sender addre
Hi all,
Sometimes our mail server is 'under attack' and we get a lot of these
entries in our log file:
Aug 17 11:08:19 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/smtpd[14890]: [ID 197553
mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[212.22.199.165]: 450 4.1.8
: Sender address rejected: Domain not found;
from= t
I have installed postfix 2.6 + cyrus-sasl2 + maildrop2.1.0 + mysql5.0.83 +
apache22 + extmail1.1.0
When i send mail to myself,i can't received.and become the maillog.
I send mail to gmail.com, Gmail can received.
I have no idea about the log ,someone can help me .Thanks.
###I have repla
Hi,
im using postfix as mta for automatic mail sending out of our db. All db
users a logged in as the same (linux) user, as it's a terminal based
system. So a created mail has usually @domain.tld from and
return-path headers. Of course that's not what I want, every db user
should have his own from
57 matches
Mail list logo
