El mar, 14-07-2009 a las 13:59 -0700, Sanjay Saha escribió:
>
> So different maillogs are in specific directory /home/maillogs/Log1 2 3 and
> onwards . But i need a way to consolidate it in single file which
> could be used by mailgraph.
> Any pointer to the right direction is welcome.
>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 07:57:27PM -0400, John Peach wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:49:13 -0600
> LuKreme wrote:
>
> > On 13-Jul-2009, at 16:24, Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
> > > Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> > > and discard the latter?
> >
> >
> > Why th
I just set up postfix+amavis+clamav+dovecot on ubuntu, moving my
server from Windows/hMailServer. On the old system, I had an email
alias of !...@phrogz.net that I want to get working again. (As best I can
tell, this is valid according to both RFC2822 and RFC5322.)
Trying to send to that on
* Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL :
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> After adding a couple of hundred lines to transport.misc, these errors
>> are popping up in the mail.log:
>
>
>
>> Jul 14 04:09:14 servername postfix/smtp[22020]: fatal: garbage after "]"
>> in server description:
>> [SEGBLOGR00
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Jacky Chan wrote:
> I would like to ask if the size of message exceeds the one defined in
> main.cf, how can I configure Postfix to generate a bounce or error notice to
> user/admins?
Why? Postfix replies with a 552 so the *client* can inform the envelope
sender.
--
Sahil
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote:
> Is there a limit in the length of an email address? We have a couple of
> crazy long addresses in there e.g.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1
--
Sahil Tandon
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:49:13 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> On 13-Jul-2009, at 16:24, Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
> > Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> > and discard the latter?
>
>
> Why the devil would you want to discard mail based on a DNS error?
> DNS errors have
On 13-Jul-2009, at 16:24, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
and discard the latter?
Why the devil would you want to discard mail based on a DNS error? DNS
errors have a habit of being quite transient.
--
Lithium will no longer be
>
> From: Brian Evans - Postfix List
> Date: 2009/07/14 Tue PM 04:14:41 EDT
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Setting up postfix problems
>
> proph...@vizion.occoxmail.com wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get
my
> > configuration correct
Hello,
Is there any way we can consolidate multiple maillog files ( from single
domain) but different hosts.
I am trying to bring up mailgraph (http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/) to read
from one single source for log file.
Since rrd tool is very strict about the records in the log it doesnt pick
proph...@vizion.occoxmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get my
> configuration correct to ensure there are no open relays.
> For obvious reasons I am not posting from the network
> concerned! I set out below
> 1. Details of test with abuse.net
> 2. mail
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get my
> configuration correct to ensure there are no open relays.
> For obvious reasons I am not posting from the network
> concerned! I set out below
> 1. Details of test with abuse.net
> 2. mai
>
> From: mouss
> Date: 2009/07/14 Tue PM 03:40:14 EDT
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Setting up postfix problems
>
> proph...@vizion.occoxmail.com a écrit :
> > dns1# postconf -n
> > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Daniel L'Hommedieu
wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2009, at 15:32, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Tim Legg wrote:
>>
>>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>>> timothylegg.com. 9220 IN MX 10 mail.timothylegg.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> My hostname is genex.t
Tim Legg wrote:
Hello,
Now that I have my local mail set up, I can let my domain name come up
from hiding.
When I run:
# hostname -f
genex.timothylegg.com
and
# dig timothylegg.com MX
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;timothylegg.com. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
timothylegg.com.
On Jul 14, 2009, at 15:32, Scott Haneda wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Tim Legg wrote:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
timothylegg.com.9220IN MX 10 mail.timothylegg.com.
My hostname is genex.timothylegg.com on my machine and my MX record
points
to mail.timothylegg.com
I w
proph...@vizion.occoxmail.com a écrit :
> dns1# postconf -n
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> command_directory = /usr/local/sbin
> config_directory = /usr/local/etc/postfix
> daemon_direct
Tim Legg a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Now that I have my local mail set up, I can let my domain name come up
> from hiding.
>
> When I run:
>
> # hostname -f
> genex.timothylegg.com
>
> and
>
> # dig timothylegg.com MX
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;timothylegg.com. IN MX
>
> ;; ANSW
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Tim Legg wrote:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
timothylegg.com.9220IN MX 10 mail.timothylegg.com.
My hostname is genex.timothylegg.com on my machine and my MX record
points
to mail.timothylegg.com
I was wondering if the MX record should point to the
Hello,
Now that I have my local mail set up, I can let my domain name come up
from hiding.
When I run:
# hostname -f
genex.timothylegg.com
and
# dig timothylegg.com MX
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;timothylegg.com. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
timothylegg.com.9220IN M
dns1# postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/local/sbin
config_directory = /usr/local/etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/local/libexec/postfix
data
> I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get my
> configuration correct to ensure there are no open relays.
> For obvious reasons I am not posting from the network
> concerned! I set out below
> 1. Details of test with abuse.net
> 2. maillog entries for the test
> 3. network requireme
Hi
I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get my
configuration correct to ensure there are no open relays.
For obvious reasons I am not posting from the network
concerned! I set out below
1. Details of test with abuse.net
2. maillog entries for the test
3. network requirements for
Hi
I am comparatively new to postfix and seem unable to get my
configuration correct to ensure there are no open relays.
For obvious reasons I am not posting from the network
concerned! I set out below
1. Details of test with abuse.net
2. maillog entries for the test
3. network requirements for
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:55:39PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> > > Jul 14 00:11:58 rap postfix/smtpd[1054]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > > rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450 4.1.8 : Sender
> > > address rejected: Domain not found; from=
> > > to= proto=ESMTP helo= Jul 14 00:11:
Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:24:10AM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>> Well, still problems, but of the more understandable type.
>>
>> Jul 14 00:11:58 rap postfix/smtpd[1054]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450 4.1.8 : Sender
>> address reject
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> > Jul 14 00:11:58 rap postfix/smtpd[1054]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450 4.1.8 : Sender
> > address rejected: Domain not found; from=
> > to= proto=ESMTP helo= Jul 14 00:11:58 rap
> > postfix/smtpd[1054]: > rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450
> > 4.1.8 :
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
and discard the latter?
Not inside postfix. You could use a sufficiently flexible
policy server for this absurd action.
I did have in main.cf:
unknown_address_reject_code = 550
... which will a
Scott Haneda a écrit :
> Hello. I am looking for clarification on RFC 5068 3.2 or any
> related/updated/replaced RFC's. Outside of those, general best practice
> ideas for moving forward would be appreciated.
>
> In regards to AUTH on ports 25 and 587, I was under the impression we
> should be t
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:24:10AM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> Well, still problems, but of the more understandable type.
>
> Jul 14 00:11:58 rap postfix/smtpd[1054]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450 4.1.8 : Sender
> address rejected: Domain not found; from=
> to=
Keld Jørn Simonsen schrieb:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Wietse Venema:
>>> Keld J_rn Simonsen:
> OK, here goes:
>
> 1) The server replies with "good news". Postfix replies with good news.
>
> 2) The server replies with "bad news". Postfix
Ing. Davy Leon wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have a question. Is that possible to make postfix keep messages
> bigger than let's say 500K in the queue for delivery at certain hours,
> let say night hours to save bandwith?
You can do this with a policy service such as postfwd or roll your own
(if desire
Hello. I am looking for clarification on RFC 5068 3.2 or any related/
updated/replaced RFC's. Outside of those, general best practice ideas
for moving forward would be appreciated.
In regards to AUTH on ports 25 and 587, I was under the impression we
should be trying to migrate all clients
Hi guys
I have a question. Is that possible to make postfix keep messages bigger than
let's say 500K in the queue for delivery at certain hours, let say night hours
to save bandwith?
Thanks in advance
David
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Keld J_rn Simonsen:
> > > > OK, here goes:
> > > >
> > > > 1) The server replies with "good news". Postfix replies with good news.
> > > >
> > > > 2) The server replies with "bad news". Postfix replies with 5xx.
>
* Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> After adding a couple of hundred lines to transport.misc, these errors
> are popping up in the mail.log:
>
>
>
> Jul 14 04:09:14 servername postfix/smtp[22020]: fatal: garbage after "]"
> in server description:
> [SEGBLOGR0008.springe
Hi All,
After adding a couple of hundred lines to transport.misc, these errors
are popping up in the mail.log:
Jul 14 04:09:14 servername postfix/smtp[22020]: fatal: garbage after "]"
in server description:
[SEGBLOGR0008.springer-sbm.com],relay:[SEGBLOGR0008.springer
-sbm.com]
It's a s
Wietse Venema:
> Keld J_rn Simonsen:
> > > OK, here goes:
> > >
> > > 1) The server replies with "good news". Postfix replies with good news.
> > >
> > > 2) The server replies with "bad news". Postfix replies with 5xx.
> > >
> > > 3) No server reply. Postfix replies with 4xx.
> > >
> > > Is thi
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> > OK, here goes:
> >
> > 1) The server replies with "good news". Postfix replies with good news.
> >
> > 2) The server replies with "bad news". Postfix replies with 5xx.
> >
> > 3) No server reply. Postfix replies with 4xx.
> >
> > Is this finally clear?
>
> Yes, thanks.
Keld Jørn Simonsen schrieb:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:37:30AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:58:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> and discard
Jaime Kikpole a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Victor
> Duchovni wrote:
>>> Don't use a CNAME in a mail address.
>
> Why not? After all, how would you handle vhosts if you can't send as
> the CNAME record?
>
since when CNAME was needed for vhosts?
alice A 192.0.2.1
On 14/7/09 12:10, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
OK, here goes:
1) The server replies with "good news". Postfix replies with good news.
2) The server replies with "bad news". Postfix replies with 5xx.
3) No server reply. Postfix replies with 4xx.
Is this finally clear?
Yes, thanks. But it seems
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:37:30AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:58:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> > > > Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> > > > and discard the latter?
> > >
> > >
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:58:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> > > Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> > > and discard the latter?
> >
> > Postfix is only the messenger of the bad news. When the server
> > responds,
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 10:20:09 Jacky Chan wrote:
>
> I would like to ask if the size of message exceeds the one defined in
> main.cf, how can I configure Postfix to generate a bounce or error notice
> to user/admins?
User?
On our boxes it returns an appropriate error code to the sender (who is
On Mon, July 13, 2009 19:34, Noel Jones wrote:
> Don't use a CNAME in a mail address.
hmm i belived it was just for the mx to not be a cname ?
--
xpoint
On Mon, July 13, 2009 18:05, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
> When RT sends an email to me, it is coming from
> r...@atlas.cairodurham.org. I am trying to make that say
> r...@cns.cairodurham.org, instead.
postconf -e 'myorigin=cns.cairodurham.org'
postconf -e 'myhostname=atlas.cairodurham.org'
more prob
Hi all,
I would like to ask if the size of message exceeds the one defined in
main.cf, how can I configure Postfix to generate a bounce or error notice to
user/admins?
Thank you very much!
Best,
Jacky
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Message-Size-Limit-Exceed-tp24476172p
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:58:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> > Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> > and discard the latter?
>
> Postfix is only the messenger of the bad news. When the server
> responds, Postfix acts accordingly. When the
49 matches
Mail list logo
