On Fri, 03 Jul 2009, priscilla wrote:
> We want to allow only authenticated sender to send mails.
The incomplete set of configuration variables you list below are unrelated to
this goal. If you want to do something other than simply "allow
authenticated sender to send mails", then please clarify
Dear All,
We have installed postfix with openldap and cyrus sasl.
We want to allow only authenticated sender to send mails.
We have configured the following in postfix's main.cf to implement the same.
smtpd_sender_login_maps=
smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender=yes
smtpd_sender_restrictions=reject_sende
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> Does anybody know how I can test whether my DKIM setup, keys etc, is
> correct.
This is the *Postfix* mailing list. Next time, please spend at least a
minute or two on Google.
> Is there a public/open testbed.
http://testing.dkim.org/reflector.html
Does anybody know how I can test whether my DKIM setup, keys etc, is
correct.
Is there a public/open testbed.
TIA
JLA
Avinash Sultanpur wrote:
Hi,
I have a set of domains for which I am relaying mails through my
server. The final destination server for some of these domains are
always available (connected to the internet all the time and powered
on) for which I would like to implement recipient address
veri
Right
1) Upgraded to postfix 2.7 20090607 release
and no error message in SASL, YAY!!!
However,
Jul 2 20:38:57 doctor doctor[31]: postfix/smtpd[6175]: warning: milter
unix:/var/run/milter/milter-clamc.socket: can't read SMFIC_OPTNEG reply packet
header: Broken pipe
Jul 2 20:38:57 doctor do
Hello,
I want to use multiple relayhost parameter because i want to use more than
one relay to send emails. My serve will handle emails for only one domain.
My need is to have multiple relayhost.
Thanks,
Wilson
-Mensagem original-
De: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org]
Enviada e
Wilson A. Galafassi Jr. wrote:
Hello to all,
I need to configure postfix to use multiple smtp relayhosts for a single
domain.
This is possible? How?
Your question is not entirely clear, so I'm going to answer as
if "single domain" refers to a single outbound destination,
with other outbou
2009-07-02 16:00:12 MagnusB鋍k wrote:
>You don't have two instances of Postfix, you just have two smtpd(8)
>listeners. The transport selection is global to a Postfix instance, so you
>can't have different virtual transports depending on the entry point. But
>why are you using virtual_transport any
Hello to all,
I need to configure postfix to use multiple smtp relayhosts for a single
domain.
This is possible? How?
Thanks,
Wilson
* Jaroslaw Grzabel :
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I didn't include any information about version. My postfix version is
> 2.3.3 installed from yum (Centos 5).
>
> Yeah, I read about stress mode and it looks really good. Anyway I would
> rather want to stop reciving connection from postfix than hang the whole
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I didn't include any information about version. My postfix version is
2.3.3 installed from yum (Centos 5).
Yeah, I read about stress mode and it looks really good. Anyway I would
rather want to stop reciving connection from postfix than hang the whole
server.
Hi,
Sorry I didn't include any information about version. My postfix version is
2.3.3 installed from yum (Centos 5).
Yeah, I read about stress mode and it looks really good. Anyway I would
rather want to stop reciving connection from postfix than hang the whole
server.
The problem is, Noel advi
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:51:07AM +0530, Avinash Sultanpur wrote:
> relay_recipient_maps = pgsql:recipients
>
> I found that the address verification probes are sent out even for the
> recipients which are listed in the relay_recipient_maps. So I included
> check_recipient_access which returned
Hi,
I have a set of domains for which I am relaying mails through my server.
The final destination server for some of these domains are always
available (connected to the internet all the time and powered on) for
which I would like to implement recipient address verification. There
are some o
this is not a problem of software
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:07, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> my key is good
>
> use now
> http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dkimproxy.html
>
> result idem not good
>
> Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 17:21, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> > Le je
this is not a problem of software
nb : sorry for the stupid top-post, its error
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:12, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:07, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> > my key is good
> >
> > use now
> > http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dki
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 20:07, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> my key is good
>
> use now
> http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dkimproxy.html
>
> result idem not good
>
> Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 17:21, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 09:31:29, fake..
my key is good
use now
http://rpms.netmindz.net/el5/SRPMS.netmindz/repoview/dkimproxy.html
result idem not good
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 17:21, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 09:31:29, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 16:23, fake...@fakessh.eu
On 2 Jul 2009, at 16:46, Terry Carmen wrote:
Hi
I know that If I ask this stupid question all of you will sendme
to man or
here: http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
But I wonder if any of you knows about a begining manual for dummy
sysadmins
to let them to work with already post
--On Thursday, July 02, 2009 8:10 AM +0200 Ihsan Dogan
wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
No. LDAP supports robust distributed caching via replication. If you
want local caching on a MTA, field an LDAP replica on the MTA or
dedicate a suitable replica on a nearby machine to the MTA.
LDAP caching
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 10:57:09, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:23:29 +0200, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
wrote:
> > But I wonder if any of you knows about a beggning manual for dummy
> > sysadmins to let them to work with already postfix installation.
>
> I think the architecture overvi
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi,
I'm struggling with new SMTP server and I noticed that sometimes it just
hangs because of:
Jul 2 14:14:21 smtp postfix/master[17716]: warning: service "smtp" (25)
has reached its process limit "50": new clients may experience
noticeable delays
Jul 2 14:15:06 sm
Jaroslaw Grzabel:
> Hi,
>
> I'm struggling with new SMTP server and I noticed that sometimes it just
> hangs because of:
>
> Jul 2 14:14:21 smtp postfix/master[17716]: warning: service "smtp" (25)
> has reached its process limit "50": new clients may experience
> noticeable delays
> Jul 2 14
On 7/2/2009 12:20 PM, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> I'm struggling with new SMTP server and I noticed that sometimes it just
> hangs because of:
Per the welcome message you received when you joined the list:
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
At a minimum, postfix
Hi,
I'm struggling with new SMTP server and I noticed that sometimes it just
hangs because of:
Jul 2 14:14:21 smtp postfix/master[17716]: warning: service "smtp" (25)
has reached its process limit "50": new clients may experience
noticeable delays
Jul 2 14:15:06 smtp postfix/master[17716]:
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:23:29 +0200, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
wrote:
> But I wonder if any of you knows about a beggning manual for dummy sysadmins
> to let them to work with already postfix installation.
I think the architecture overview gives a pretty good idea of how it all works:
http://www.
2009/7/2 Terry Carmen :
>> But I wonder if any of you knows about a begining manual for dummy sysadmins
>> to let them to work with already postfix installation.
>
> There is at least one Postifx Book available, that seems to be popular,
> although I have never actually seen it.
http://www.postfix
> Hi
>
> I know that If I ask this stupid question all of you will sendme to man or
> here: http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
>
> But I wonder if any of you knows about a begining manual for dummy sysadmins
> to let them to work with already postfix installation.
It's not a dumb question.
Hi
I know that If I ask this stupid question all of you will sendme to man or
here: http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
But I wonder if any of you knows about a beggning manual for dummy sysadmins
to let them to work with already postfix installation.
TIA
LD
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 09:31:29, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 16:23, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
> i have posted on dkimproxy-uses list
>
> > I have two domain names sign with dkimproxy
> > fakessh.eu and renelacroute.fr
> > I use the latest version available on sourcefo
Le jeudi 2 juillet 2009 16:23, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
i have posted on dkimproxy-uses list
> I have two domain names sign with dkimproxy
> fakessh.eu and renelacroute.fr
> I use the latest version available on sourceforge
> in centos 5.3
> its the same bad error for the 2 areas
>
> We hope th
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
In the future, when I install postfix, will the correct symlinks be
created for me, if sendmail is not present, or is this something I
have to do manually? (I am using a an RPM from CentOS extras compiled
with MySQL support).
This is
2009/6/29, Ignacio Vazquez :
> Hi there,
>
> We have a mail relay in the DMZ (SRV1) which receives all mail sent to
> example dot com, but we also have an additional server on the internal
> network (SRV2) wich receives some mails from the same domain. To do
> this in SRV1, the transport has:
> us.
Hi guys,
A fair number of our users forward their mail on to other domains or
forward mail and keep a copy in their local account with us. To help
compensate for SPF checking done by some domains we're looking at
making our own SRS daemon. The only one I've found so far only caters
for rewriting f
Have you tried sending mail through telnet?
That way you can determine if it is in your script or in your postfix config.
Could you post your configuration and the perl script?
Is there any relevant logging?
HTH
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Shane Ardeen wrote:
> Hi
>
Shane Ardeen:
> Hi
> I recently installed and configured postfix as my dev mail server. It's been
> working well but when I tried to send mail by a perl script I kept getting
> "lost connection after MAIL" as a result of "smtp_get: EOF".
> The same perl script sends mail to my production server whi
On Thursday 02 July 2009 10:21:35 Umar wrote:
>
> : host mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.92.152] said: 550 OU-002 Mail
> rejected by Windows Live Hotmail for policy reasons. Reasons for
> rejection
> may be related to content with spam-like characteristics or IP/domain
> reputation problems. If
Dear Members!
I have recently configure a Postfix mail server with domain keys, spf,
sender id etc.
It working fine and I can send and receive emails anywhere without any
problem. But hotmail and msn rejected my email here is the message I am
getting from hotmail.
: host mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.
thnks
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thu, July 2, 2009 9:15 am, K bharathan said:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> >
> > > What do you mean? Do you want to delete all messages destined to a
> > > specific domain? What problem would that solve?
Thanks Victor,
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 02:48:00PM +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have enabled "sender_bcc_maps" in my main.cf. The lookup file has
> just
> > 2 entries.
>
> What fraction of your traffic is sent by these 2 entries. Do you have
> content filters downstr
Hi
I recently installed and configured postfix as my dev mail server. It's been
working well but when I tried to send mail by a perl script I kept getting
"lost connection after MAIL" as a result of "smtp_get: EOF".
The same perl script sends mail to my production server which is hosted by
my ISP a
On Thu, July 2, 2009 8:46 am, sosogh said:
> I am running two postfix instances:
> 0.0.0.0:25
> 127.0.0.1:10025
>
> I want 0.0.0.0:25 to use virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/tmp/dspam.sock
> 127.0.0.1:10025 to usevirtual_transport = dovecot
>
> so I add
> virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/tmp/ds
On Thu, July 2, 2009 9:15 am, K bharathan said:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > What do you mean? Do you want to delete all messages destined to a
> > specific domain? What problem would that solve?
>
> in fact it's mistake
> when i created a phplist mailing i forgot to
in fact it's mistake
when i created a phplist mailing i forgot to create a bounce handling host
and a return mail address; now those bounced messages are in deferred queue
so i want to get rid of that deferred msgs from the queue
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thursday
45 matches
Mail list logo
