Re: Postfix Logfile

Schwalbe, Oliver wrote: Hi there, i have a little problem to change time of logswitch for the postfix-logfile mail in /var/log/. the logswitch yet is every day at 11:00 am. The switch should take place at midnight. i can't find any parameter in main.cf or master.cf This is not a function

Re: Postfix Logfile

2009/6/26 Schwalbe, Oliver : > i have a little problem to change time of logswitch for the postfix-logfile > mail in /var/log/. > the logswitch yet is every day at 11:00 am. The switch should take place at > midnight. > i can't find any parameter in main.cf or master.cf If I'm understanding you co

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

On 6/25/09 10:16 PM, "Victor Duchovni" wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >>> IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned >>> before the queue-id. >> >> My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But does that mean an >

Postfix Logfile

Hi there, i have a little problem to change time of logswitch for the postfix-logfile mail in /var/log/. the logswitch yet is every day at 11:00 am. The switch should take place at midnight. i can't find any parameter in main.cf or master.cf Kind regards Oliver

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned > > before the queue-id. > > My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But does that mean an > instance can exist *before* the first recipient is ac

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote: > > > > > I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and > > > returns > > > an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any deci

Re: greylist and then still RBL?

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, LuKreme wrote: > I have the following in my main.cf: > > < #smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes > mime_header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/mime_headers.pcre > smtpd_restriction_classes = check_greylist > check_greylist = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023 > > MAINCF >

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote: > > > I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns > > an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any decisions. What I?m noticing is many > > of the client requests do

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Blake Hudson wrote: > > Original Message > Subject: Re: Header Time > From: Linux Addict > > >> I dont think this is something to do with outlook as I tested with yahoo >> and gmail as well. I see the same pattern. >> Looks to me message leaves

RE: customize bounce behavior

> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:56:34 +0200 > From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: customize bounce behavior > > George Forman a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > > > I apologize if this has already been covered but I can't seem to find > > any information. > > I need to

greylist and then still RBL?

I have the following in my main.cf: <(there are no leading spaces or stray ,'s, I pasted the lines exactly in, including the following blank line.) but when I look at postconf, the "check_greylist =" does not show up. $ postconf -n | grep grey smtpd_restriction_classes = check_greylist $ Is

Re: A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote: > I¹ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns > an ³OK² and doesn¹t otherwise make any decisions. What I¹m noticing is many > of the client requests do not even contain the instance attribute. My > assumption from reading th

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

On 25-Jun-2009, at 14:33, Ville Walveranta wrote: It works except that the Postfix refresh message ("postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system") is displayed despite of the attempt to redirect it to /dev/null? Any idea how I could hide it? That refresh message is output on std

A question about the instance attribute in policy delegation

Hi, I¹ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns an ³OK² and doesn¹t otherwise make any decisions. What I¹m noticing is many of the client requests do not even contain the instance attribute. My assumption from reading the documentation was that even a single reci

Re: adding headers for bcc recipients

Bernardo Pons a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a way to add a header to the messages before they are > delivered to a multidrop mailbox with virtual aliases. > > After searching the postfix-users list archives I've found that > this subject has been already discused here and I've found

Re: customize bounce behavior

George Forman a écrit : > Hi, > > > I apologize if this has already been covered but I can't seem to find > any information. > I need to customize the bounce behavior for the following: > 1. If a bounce message is created because it can't deliver to a specified >list of email addresses we don

Re: rejecting client=unknown[ip.ad.dr.ess]

LuKreme a écrit : > On 22-Jun-2009, at 18:29, mouss wrote: >>> Is there anyway to, if not outright reject anyone whose DNS shows up as >>> unknown to at least tempfail them with a "Ooops, your DNS is not >>> resolving, try back later" or something? > >> if you insist, you could use one of >> >> ht

Re: Header Time

Original Message Subject: Re: Header Time From: Linux Addict I dont think this is something to do with outlook as I tested with yahoo and gmail as well. I see the same pattern. Looks to me message leaves postfix with updated time stamp. �Is there any verbose can enabled i

Re: Header Time

Linux Addict wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sahil Tandon > wrote: On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict mailto:linuxaddi...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe < g...@slsware.com

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:17 PM, ghe wrote: > I can't say much because I know next to nothing about Outlook and friends, > but MS keeps time in local time (I hear), and *nix goes on GMT, and there's > a 4 hour time correction for your local time, and you're seeing a 4 hour > time change in your h

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Perfect! Thanks all!!

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Ville Walveranta wrote: > Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly -- > thanks Barney!): > > --- > #!/bin/sh > > ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr > NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp > > dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o >

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Ville Walveranta wrote: Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly -- thanks Barney!): --- #!/bin/sh ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o 'ip4:[0-9./]+' | se

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Ville Walveranta wrote: It works except that the Postfix refresh message ("postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system") is displayed despite of the attempt to redirect it to /dev/null? Any idea how I could hide it? It's probably writing to stderr, postfix reload 2>/dev/null

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly -- thanks Barney!): --- #!/bin/sh ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o 'ip4:[0-9./]+' | sed 's/^ip4://' | sed 's/$/

Re: Header Time

I can't say much because I know next to nothing about Outlook and friends, but MS keeps time in local time (I hear), and *nix goes on GMT, and there's a 4 hour time correction for your local time, and you're seeing a 4 hour time change in your headers in mail being passed between *nix and MS. B

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe < > g...@slsware.com>wrote: > >> On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: >> >> A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them i

Re: spammers masquerading as me

Hi all, That seems to have done it... banging my head against the problem all because of a typo. Thanks, Stu J.P. Trosclair wrote: Stuart Matthews wrote: I have already tried editing /usr/local/etc/postfix/access, adding: eff.orgREJECTyou can't send mail as me! And of course I r

Re: Header Time

On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe wrote: On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing

Re: Header Time

On 6/25/09 12:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: I am curious where its getting the -400(EDIT) from. It's EDT, not EDIT. It means that the local time (Eastern Daylight Time) is 4 hours less than GMT... -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com

Re: Header Time

* Linux Addict : > We are, but these aren't even going out. There is a transport map which > directs it to internal exchange servers. > > I am curious where its getting the -400(EDIT) from. Please show the exact header... and 2 lines before and after. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe wrote: > On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: > > A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in >> outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems >> to doing -400 (EDT). >> > > Hmmm. 4 hours. Are you usin

Re: Incoming smtp: 554 Access Denied

Noel Jones wrote: If not, they *should not* be connecting to your smtps port; their mail server is misconfigured and it's not your problem. This was exactly the problem. I did some troubleshooting with the mail admin of the sending server. One of their servers was attempting to connect on por

Re: Header Time

On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing -400 (EDT). Hmmm. 4 hours. Are you using greylisting? -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com

Re: best practices for workstations that occasionally disconnect

William Yardley wrote: I was thinking that setting $defer_transports might avoid $maximal_queue_lifetime, but from my tests, looks like that's not the case. What about holding the messages? Same thing? Messages on hold never expire (postfix ignores messages in the hold queue). When they are r

Header Time

Hi, I am sure someone can clarify it for me. A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing -400 (EDT). by postfixmta.domain.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B1257AB5 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:16

customize bounce behavior

Hi, I apologize if this has already been covered but I can't seem to find any information. I need to customize the bounce behavior for the following: 1. If a bounce message is created because it can't deliver to a specified list of email addresses we don't want a bounce returned. 2. If a bo

Re: slow link

Thanks Wietse I'm checking the links right now. Thanks my friend David - Original Message - From: "Wietse Venema" To: "Postfix users" Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:00 AM Subject: Re: slow link Ing. Davy Leon: Hello guys Before all, please forget my bad English. I'm newbie in

Re: slow link

Ing. Davy Leon: > Hello guys > > Before all, please forget my bad English. > I'm newbie in postfix. I want to ask you a question. Let me explain > the situation. > I have a dialup link. When the link goes up automatically executes > a postqueue -f command and mail is delivered. The problem is lin

adding headers for bcc recipients

Hi all, I'm looking for a way to add a header to the messages before they are delivered to a multidrop mailbox with virtual aliases. After searching the postfix-users list archives I've found that this subject has been already discused here and I've found a message from Zoltan Balogh that seemed

slow link

Hello guys Before all, please forget my bad English. I'm newbie in postfix. I want to ask you a question. Let me explain the situation. I have a dialup link. When the link goes up automatically executes a postqueue -f command and mail is delivered. The problem is link speed, I'm getting timeou

Re: matching IP ranges in headers

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:14:29PM +1000, Barney Desmond wrote: > 2009/6/25 Louis-David Mitterrand : > >        /^((Received|X-Originating-IP):.+\b(124\.120\.1\.( > REGEX>)\b/ > > > > in pcre:/etc/postfix/header_access. But converting IP ranges to regex'es > > is time consuming and error prone. > >

Re: matching IP ranges in headers

2009/6/25 Louis-David Mitterrand : >        /^((Received|X-Originating-IP):.+\b(124\.120\.1\.( REGEX>)\b/ > > in pcre:/etc/postfix/header_access. But converting IP ranges to regex'es > is time consuming and error prone. > > Is there a way to use a cidr table for header matching while retaining > co

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Thanks, I'll look into that; it'll simplify it a bit. Anything that is parsed from text output is obviously not super solid but for this application it'll suffice. The MX for the business domains in question is an external service that takes care of spam filtering, address consolidation, etc. The

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

> The following is "concept"; I don't have the script yet ready, but > it'll be easy to write with your favorite scripting language: > > --- > 1. get your remote sender's current SPF record: > > dig yourremotesender.com txt  > tempfile > > 2. parse the result in tempfile with regex: > > /.*?ANS

Re: customizing postfix logs with a mailing id

Magnus Bäck a écrit : On Mon, June 15, 2009 12:01 pm, Stéphane MERLE said: Can I, at least, add the from in the logs ? Jun 15 11:59:01 smtp postfix/smtp[3061]: 683EB37AECA3: to=, relay=mx1.hotmail.com[65.55.92.136]:25, conn_use=91, delay=401662, delays=401197/464/0.13/0.32, dsn=2.0.0, statu

Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

Here's an idea.. maybe it's useful for someone, so I post it here. I'm setting up a local mail server to cache remote service's mail for faster access on the LAN. The remote server has an up-to-date SPF record that is updated whenever the sending IP ranges change. I want to limit unauthenticated m

matching IP ranges in headers

Hi, A lot of spam comes from certain ip ranges (e.g. west africa) through relays (large ISPs) that would be too onerous to block. To filter these I am presently matching: /^((Received|X-Originating-IP):.+\b(124\.120\.1\.()\b/ in pcre:/etc/postfix/header_access. But converting IP ranges